this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
35 points (94.9% liked)

micromobility - Bikes, scooters, boards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

3556 readers
69 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles, heelies, or an office chair: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Recall warnings available here.

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We need to end the war on ebikes

[–] Elting@piefed.social 10 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

If you have ever been a pedestrian in one of these towns you would understand the danger they pose. People on regular bikes go 10 miles an hour. People on these things go 20 miles an hour.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is there aren't bike lanes, riding in the street is simply too dangerous you will be run over. Even residential streets have speed limits of 25 miles an hour and even the class 2 ebike won't give you assistance to that speaking, which is necessary for safety with your elderly or merely exhausted. People ride on the sidewalk because it's the only safe option. Nobody ever complains about how cars are extremely dangerous and responsible for most so-called ebike fatalities and we continue to allow extremely dangerous conditions not just for cyclists but also pedestrians and drivers themselves for no good reason

[–] Elting@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah I agree it sucks there arent bike lanes in a lot of towns. In most places it would be absolutely fine to use the side walk, but the center of university towns are congested pedestrian walkways. For the same reason you don't want to be out on the road on your E-bike, people walking to class don't want to share the way with fast moving E-bikes. This has never been a problem with regular bikes because people don't typically sprint them through the middle of campus.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

People on these things go 20 miles an hour.

On the sidewalk.

[–] parzival@lemmy.org 6 points 4 weeks ago

Which is the issue

[–] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly, I don't blame the university not wanting them even if they’re off either on account of how they can spontaneously catch on fire

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The fire issue is generic to lithium batteries, and even the industry itself wants regulations on Battery safety which I support. Sodium ion batteries don't catch fire and China's Mass producing them and you can buy them today. It's likely that electric cars and bikes will probably end up using sodium ion batteries long term. You only really need Lithium-ion batteries for Ultra portable devices

[–] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's interesting actually, I'll have to look more into sodium ion batteries to figure out what they're all about.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah for stationary and even some Mobile use sodium ion batteries are going to be the new dominant technology

[–] hallettj@leminal.space 2 points 4 weeks ago

There's also lithium iron phosphate (LFP) which doesn't catch on fire either, and has been around longer. There are trade-offs, like sodium being vastly more plentiful than lithium.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I can push 30 on my regular bike over a short distance

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And if you did that in the middle of a crowded pedestrian area I would consider you an asshole.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 weeks ago

Right, but the problem is the speed, not the type of bike.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow 20 mph. Maybe we should ban all vehicles that go so fast if it's so dangerous.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The key issue here is that a bicycle is a human scale vehicle whereas a car is a commercial scale vehicle.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

All the more reason to ban cars then.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The new policy will include five bike racks on the perimeter of campus designated for e-bike parking and storage. These are the only approved locations for e-bikes on campus.

Ah. It's a fully pedestrianized campus and their solution seems to preserve the ability to commute to and from campus via ebike. Still kinda sucks though.

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

A fully-pedestrianized campus could justify the "collision risk" cited in the campus email, but it's really hard to do the same for the "fire risk" that they also cited. If the idea is that the five bike racks in question are somehow more easily defended against battery fires, or have no structures nearby that would be within range of a battery fire, that's a hard sell when a map of the campus shows over a dozen car-parking surface lots scattered all over.

These lots are large enough that if car parking was displaced in the center to make room for more ebike racks, there would be no structures or even other cars within damage range if a fire broke out. Having just five racks is, IMO, a sign of being inconsiderate and car-centric.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

Exactly. Integrating bicycle safely into a campus is extremely easy, it's just that they're demonized

[–] Elting@piefed.social -4 points 4 weeks ago

I think the purpose of the E-bike racks is so that students can still commute to campus on their E-bikes. They just dont want them zooming around highly populated pedestrian walkways. Also, lithium battery fires are no joke and people do take these kinds of devices indoors to charge. If this prevents even a single indoor fire, then the policy is sound.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world -5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The question to ask is how many people got run over before this policy happened.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 weeks ago

The answer is zero.