this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
419 points (100.0% liked)

News

37582 readers
1763 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 57 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

The jury found Ticketmaster had overcharged customers by $1.72 (£1.27) on each ticket sold over a period of several years. That figure is set to be used as the basis for calculating damages.

So... this was a waste of time, then... No one was complaining because Taylor Swift tickets were a buck and some change more expensive...

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, you don't actually expect them to pay all that money back, do you? It's already been spent! 😬

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'm guessing that number comes from them essentially having the processing fee twice when the venue itself is owned by livenation as well, rather than it being about the dynamic pricing they're known for.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well... based on a (conservative) sales figure of 500M tickets sold per year over the last 5 years, that's a penaly of ~$4.3B in restitution. That doesn't include potential punitive damages.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's actually much worse (for us, not them). From the NBC article.

Live Nation said the jury’s award of $1.72 per ticket "applies to a limited number of tickets—those sold at 257 venues, which represent about 20% of total tickets—and only to purchases by fans (excluding brokers) in certain states over the past five years.”

“Based on that scope, we believe the aggregate single damages figure would be below $150 million, which would be trebled,” the company said. “In connection with the DOJ settlement, Live Nation has already accrued $280 million toward state damages and civil penalty claims. Injunctive relief will be determined by the Court after the states make a remedy proposal, which we expect in the coming weeks.”

So, even though $4.3 billion is pretty paltry against their annual revenue of $25 billion, it's potentially MUCH less because the scope is so limited.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah... right. Because this only applies to the states that didn't agree to the settlement. Welp. That is pretty disappointing. I would have hoped it would hit them a little harder. I don't really care about what I'm going to get out of it (though I am in one of the states that didn't settle), so much as the degree to which it hurts Live Nation.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 40 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They ran a monopoly? They’re still doing that, aren’t they?

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 weeks ago

Yes and they'll continue doing so

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 4 weeks ago

they even bragged about gouging customers.

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No shit.

The consequences will be full disbandment of the company, right? Right?

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

The relevant law (the Clayton Act) requires the judge to “terminate” the monopoly, but that happens…rarely.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Every 20 years or so, it is revealed that LiveNation is a truly shitty company, everybody agrees on that, and then we all go back to business as usual.

The only reason that this particular "investigation" is happening is because a bunch of politicians got their asses reamed by their spoiled daughters who were demanding Taylor Swift tix on her last tour, and the politician parents found out how much tickets cost these days.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every 20 years???? Try continuously. They don't even bother hiding it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This isn't their first time around the Congressional Carousel. Every 20 years they get awful enough that they get the attention of Congress, who has to have a Congressional Dog & Pony Show®, and posture and bloviate, then everything goes back to business as usual.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Live Nation killed Kurt Kobain!

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I said this 20+ years ago. I haven't used ticketmaster since.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

So did Pearl Jam at the height of their popularity

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We all gonna get maybe $12 for sending in a mailer!

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Quick google search says they sell like 600 million tickets a year, so it's still $1B per year. They only had like $3B in profit last year, won't you think of the shareholders?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like they over charged customers by $1.72. so if you bought a few dozen tickets, after all the legal feels you might get $12 of you're lucky.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

Live Nation argued throughout the trial that it was not a monopoly and that it competed "fiercely" with rivals in the entertainment space, with sports teams, concert promoters and other venue operators.

Bullshit.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 9 points 3 weeks ago

I suggest a duopoly where each board of directors has shares in the others

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

And what lesson is being taught yet again..?

Crime DOES pay, and it pays very well

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I like ticketmaster and live nation personally.

They're a perfectly encapsulated refutation of the idea that capitalism breeds innovation or reduces costs.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't wait for my $3 check. Maybe people could pool the settlement money and hire some sort of person to punish the board members publicly... Maybe toe them to a chair at a amateur guitar convention for Oasis enthusiasts.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No chairs. Tie them to a wall and make them wonder what's going to happen next. You could call it the Wonderwall.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's all just Pachabel's Canon in various keys

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago

They are going to create a new company. Called LiveTickets. The 3rd and totally unrelated company so they can they don’t have a monopoly. Just ignore its all the same investors, board and c-suite.

[–] decended_being@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago
  • Are we going to get any of our money back?
  • Is getting our money going to be easy, or another class action lawsuit form that feels like a scam the whole way through the process?
  • Is Ticketmaster going to change their practices in any meaningful way?
[–] TwodogsFighting 4 points 3 weeks ago

Gosh. I would never have thought it.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And the "punishment" will be a fraction of a percent of what they've profited from this ongoing fraud.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago

Oooh no, another day USA not doing the right thing! What the rest of the world will to stop it?

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago

Any smaller competitors the do get in eventually, will just join in with the price gouging and price fixing. Not that this court case has done anything anyway