this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
809 points (99.6% liked)

World News

55505 readers
2619 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 153 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Somebody better put up a big fuckoff wall between the US and Mexico to keep the Americans out.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 73 points 4 days ago

She built a wall and made Americans pay for it! God damn socialists! /s

[–] Cliff@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I think i have seen this storyline in a tv show before.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 84 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What really makes me chuckle is whenever someone tries to insist to me that Mexican men are chauvinists, and I have to remind them that not only did they elect a woman, but they elected a woman who is doing FDR shit and actually making people's lives better.

I'm jealous. The closest we got was Bernie and both parties swift-boated him.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (6 children)

They are horribly chauvinistic.

Let's play a game. The US elected Obama so they are not racist riiight?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I see the point you're getting at, but this is too big of a debate for Saturday morning. :)

Have a great day.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Franklin D. Roosevelt, a US president who in the 1930's ended the great depression by finally implementing some social welfare programs and reining in corporate power somewhat (like protecting the right to unionize) to prevent a socialist revolution.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (6 children)

God I love the Fediverse.

Feels weird, but I just love that people answer questions and aren't jerks about it.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago

The chillness of this place has been pretty awesome, and I very much want to perpetuate that chillness and goodwill as best I can :)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is my belief that every society benefits from free healthcare.

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow, like youre not even considering billionaire pedophiles.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Won't someone please think of the billionaires?

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And the children its way easier to fuck if they all rely on grants from you for cancer treatment?

Bonus; no fatties once they start chemo!

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

CIA backed fascist coup in 3...2...

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They'll just pay a drug lord to take her out and leave it be.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have a feeling you are closer to the truth than you might imagine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 69 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Since coming to power in 2024, Sheinbaum has sought to undo decades of damage caused by neoliberal policies, building on the work of the previous socialist government. She has pledged to build 1.8m new homes to tackle a housing shortage while strengthening tenants’ rights.

Last year she announced plans to shorten the work week from 48 hours to 40 hours, while increasing the minimum wage by 13%, continuing a policy of regular hikes championed by her predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador since 2018.

“For years it was said that the minimum wage couldn’t go up,” she told a conference in December, “that it would cause inflation, that there would no longer be investment in the country, foreign investment.”

Despite that, following a cumulative minimum wage increase of 154% since 2018, “we are at a record level of foreign investment,” she added.

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Since coming to power in 2024, Sheinbaum has sought to undo decades of damage caused by neoliberal policies, building on the work of the previous socialist government. She has pledged to build 1.8m new homes to tackle a housing shortage while strengthening tenants’ rights.

Meanwhile, when she was governing CDMX, she worked with Airbnb and it helped to gentrify even more sections for the city. There have been people forced out of homes they have lived in for decades due to this pressure.

Last year she announced plans to shorten the work week from 48 hours to 40 hours, while increasing the minimum wage by 13%, continuing a policy of regular hikes championed by her predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador since 2018.

The people actually demanded this to be immediate, but they preferred to listen to business owners and are just reducing it 2 hours for each year, culminating to 40 hours in 2030.

They didn't change anything related to how many days we need to work each week, so employers will try to squeeze these hours into 6-day workweeks anyway. She argued that this was not part of the historical demand for a 40 hour work-week.

Oh yeah and they EXTENDED the limit for extra-hours.

“For years it was said that the minimum wage couldn’t go up,” she told a conference in December, “that it would cause inflation, that there would no longer be investment in the country, foreign investment.”

Despite that, following a cumulative minimum wage increase of 154% since 2018, “we are at a record level of foreign investment,” she added.

Well that's true, but at the same time the cost for food has nearly doubled

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

70% of US voters want universal healthcare; 90% of Democrats and 50% of Independents.

Only Republican voters disagree, with something like 30% supporting. (all of these numbers are approximations there are many Gallup polls over the years).

I'm not a mathematician, but it appears to my untrained eye that 2/3 of Americans want Universal Healthcare. That's a very solid majority.

Why can't Ds and Rs manage to provide what the US voters want? Allow Republicans or anyone else to "opt out" of the system.

That's a rhetorical question. bOtH pArTiEs aren't interested in what their voters want.

Somehow, Israel can be financed for DECADES without the same level of voter approval.

50% of voters support Israel= billions of dollars every year

70% of voters support universal healthcare= no universal healthcare.

Kinda weird, ain't it?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The health insurance lobby fights it and also employers don't want it because then people can quit without worrying about losing their health care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 6 points 4 days ago

Profit based health insurance is not only immoral, it's fucking infuriating.

[–] RosaLuxemburgsGhost@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The US working class would have to mobilize serious strike action across the country to win universal healthcare. The capitalists don’t want their private property (companies, businesses) within the field of healthcare socialized. The working class can do it though. When organized and led by a revolutionary program and leadership, the working class can start to call the shots. All workers need to ditch the capitalist parties (dems and republicans) and support class independent parties and mobilize their power outside of the bourgeois political system.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago (6 children)
[–] night_petal@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This made me think about it. Seriously. If I could get about $2k for gas I could get to TJ.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would cease to exist were I that far from Trader Joe's.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FREE Healthcare in Mexico????

How will mom cross the US-Mexico line to buy a month of lifesaving medication for 1/10th the price now???

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Mexico already has a constitutionally guaranteed right to healthcare:

Every person has the right to health protection. The law shall determine the bases and terms to access health services and shall establish the competence of the Federation and the Local Governments in regard to sanitation according to the item XVI in Article 73 of this Constitution.

In practice, this has meant a bare minimum level of health care is theoretically available to everyone, but most working people have private insurance on top of that, or see private doctors. For the poorest people it has often been very difficult to get the care they need, even if it's theoretically available and constitutionally guaranteed. It's also different from American / Canadian / European hospitals in that family is expected to play a major role doing things that in richer countries are done by nurses or orderlies.

IMO, universal healthcare only really works if the middle class / upper middle class and the poor are all in the same system. If the people can pay more and get better care, they'll do it, and the system used by the poor will be underfunded. You can't do much about the truly rich. They'll always just fly to other countries. If this is just filling the gaps between the various reasons people can use the state system, it's not going to help that much, even if that kind of fix is necessary.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Must be nice to have politicians who are trying to improve the lives of the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unknowablenight@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good for Mexico! Let's hope USA is past invading their Latin American neighbours when they elect Socialist leaders, though...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 days ago

Take that, Americans...

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (14 children)

Random, but why is she called "socialist"? Is she going to ban capitalism (stock markets, public companies, private properties, bonds, etc.)? Or are we simply calling her socialist because she's closer to European capitalism (balanced, kept in check, regulated) rather than US capitalism?

[–] DosDude@retrofed.com 63 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Socialist is not a bad word. Only in the US it's a bad word, because socialism means billionaires need to earn less, and the billionaires won't allow that.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I never said it's a bad word, but as someone from the east, socialist sounds a bit over-the-top for just healthcare, socialism (social policies) is part of any well balanced capitalism system for me.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Here in Europe elements like healthcare still fall under socialism.

Im not sure how the Mexican government operates, but typically it's not all-or-nothing. Just because a socialist gets elected doesn't mean they suddenly have the power to completely overturn a country and kick capitalism out. Such changes would require overwhelming majorities.

However, socialists would strive to implement those elements of their idealogies they can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago

Her party is democratic socialist, center left, not socialism, left.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Being a socialist doesn't mean you have to ban capitalism the moment you get power. Or at all. There are many ways to be socialist and do socialist policy. The overarching ideology is the belief we can do better than capitalism by distributing the resources we create according to amount of work and need, instead of profit maximization. How and how quickly we achieve that differs between different kinds of socialists. Sometimes dramatically.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wish European capitalism was anywhere near what you seem to think. It's just less worse... for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

There is a very long tradition of gradualist reformist socialism, that goes all the way back to the 2nd International.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago

Just a reminder that her predecessor removed this universal access when it was called "Seguro Popular" to create the INSABI that was later renamed "IMSS-Bienestar" and was ultimately integrated into the regular IMSS due to them cutting funds for it in 2025 (she was in charge at this point).

In any case, this barely helps anyone because even if we have 'universal healthcare' its quality is going down every year. There are no drugs (medicines) and not enough medical professionals to cover the demand and that has been a reality of anyone visiting an IMSS clinic.

As usual, be critical of any head of state.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

You know what my ancestors are native origins to Mexico..

load more comments
view more: next ›