this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3377 readers
78 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Steven Spielberg grew fascinated with “Interstellar” in the year he was attached to the project before dropping out and Christopher Nolan taking over as director.

In a conversation with Empire Magazine, Spielberg looked back on his brief year working on “Interstellar” with fondness. He remembered his fascination with the topic and being warned by screenwriter Jonathan Nolan that his brother would snap up the project if he dropped out.

“I was involved with ‘Interstellar’ for a year … and I became fascinated with it,” Spielberg said. “I spent a lot of time at the [Jet Propulsion Laboratory] in Pasadena, California, talking to the scientists there and the aerospace engineers.”

He added: “I actually hired Chris Nolan’s brother [Jonathan] to write the first and second draft for me, but it didn’t stick. Jonah actually said, ‘If there comes a point where you decide not to make this movie, I can tell you who’s gonna grab it. He’s already bugging me about it. And that’s my brother Chris.’

“He was absolutely right,” Spielberg admitted. “The second I decided not to make it, Chris jumped on board, probably the next day. ‘Interstellar’ was a much better movie in Chris Nolan’s hands than it would have been in mine.”

The director swap on the beloved 2014 sci-fi epic was touched on earlier this year by Nolan himself. In a conversation with Timothée Chalamet to celebrate the anniversary of the film, Nolan recalled his excitement for what his brother wrote and how he wanted to incorporate some time travel elements he’d been working on when he came aboard.

“Right after we collaborated on ‘Dark Knight,’ my brother [Jonathan Nolan] got the job and went to work with Steven [Spielberg]. He worked on it for a lot of years,” Nolan said. “It had incredible ideas and moved through all these different iterations, but until Steven was ready to make it, whatever it is, it never quite got that momentum. Steven went off to do another film, so it became available. I had a lot of conversations with Jonathan over the years and what he was doing and what his ambitions was. I was excited by it.”

He continued: “I was incredibly struck by his first act. I had been working on a time travel idea … things looking at time. I had half-baked projects that I hadn’t committed to. When it became available, it was a case of me saying to Jonathan, ‘How would you feel if I took this and tried to combine it with some of my ideas and change a bit with what it was?’ He was fine with it. He could tell the spirit of what I was trying to do was to get to what he was initially excited about it.”

“Interstellar” landed in theaters back in November 2014. It pulled in $681 million worldwide and netted five Oscar nominations. Although the film was more mixed in reviews than Nolan’s previous Batman trilogy, it has endured the test of time and become one of the most beloved sci-fi epics of the century.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Interstellar was such a good movie. I loved how seriously they took real astrophysics as a plot device.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The cinematography and the science were amazing. The actual plot…left me dissatisfied

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Nolan keeps making gimmicky films that are very self-encapsulated and have nothing to them outside of the gimmick. ‘Interstellar’ is probably the least cameral of them, but not by much.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I had high hopes on interstellar and was very disappointed. Some parts of the plot were done very good, but the whole just crumbled.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Every Nolan movie I’ve seen had a certain level of incohesion that most people seem to look past on account of the tremendous vibes.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

They're all built around a gimmick without much attention to anything else.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

It was a dumb movie with some excellent scenes and performances.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago

He continued: “I was incredibly struck by his first act. I had been working on a time travel idea … things looking at time.

Time, Mr Nolan? You don't say...

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Christopher Nolan is quite overrated. Interstellar was shockingly dumb. I think he has gotten to a point where either not enough people are honest with him when his ideas are really stupid or his ego simply doesn't allow him to listen to people.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

He strikes me as one of those creative types that work best when someone else has a handle on them. Like how when Stephen Moffat was allowed to run DW he ran it into the ground with very Nolan-esque writing, but the episode that he wrote under Russell that introduces the stone angels is just one of the best episodes of doctor who.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I dont think RTD was the stabilising influence, given the number of shitshows that came from his own time as showrunner.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I never liked how he tried to make the doctor/companion relationship romantic. Its a sensible line the show has which was never crossed except when he was running it.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Almost all of his films are gimmicky as hell, and have barely anything outside the gimmick.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, man. I have a list. Although it's been years since I watched it, so my memory is hazy.

That whole thing where he just stumbles upon his old friend who is coincidentally in charge of this space project and just decides he is the right guy for the job? Fucking dumb writing.

Anne Hathaway's character and her speech about love? God-awful writing.

All those weird planets they are visiting, just to show off some weird space shit? Stupid writing.

The insanely idiotic decisions these supposedly highly trained and intelligent characters make again and again? My god, what idiotic writing.

Him flying into a black hole, discovering the fuckth dimension is fucking love and pushing some books off his bookshelf back in time? I would have walked out at that point, but I watched it at home.

And that's only the shit that pissed me off so much I can still remember it all these years later.

Nolan makes movies that are visually amazing and because he can try out weird stuff they are sometimes great, but acting like he's the best thing ever who can do no bad is ignoring all the really, really stupid stuff he does in his movies and I think Interstellar is the worst, with Tenet being a close second.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

Him flying into a black hole, discovering the fuckth dimension is fucking love and pushing some books off his bookshelf back in time?

Yeah, all of the comments here praising the accurate science, and I'm thinking "did I see the same movie?"

[–] axeln@norden.social 1 points 14 hours ago

@state_electrician @movies I loved Tenet (although admittedly being able to follow only a ~1/3 of the story and twists), but Interstellar was indeed underwhelming except for the imagery/cinematography.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think Interstellar is his worst movie. I generally really enjoy his movies.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That's my opinion on Oppenheimer

It's a good movie. Just... flat in some way. Hard to describe

The worst part was the nuke explosion, though. The main theme of the movie

Virtually the second lead character

And it looked like someone filmed a backyard bonfire.

A cool shot. Technically excellent. But not the right effect for the scene

I get the intent, but that was... quite laughably bad. There had to have been a point where people said "it's a cool practical explosion. Just absolutely not fitting for its intent. Let's do it differently"

Barbie was fun, tho