Steven Spielberg grew fascinated with “Interstellar” in the year he was attached to the project before dropping out and Christopher Nolan taking over as director.
In a conversation with Empire Magazine, Spielberg looked back on his brief year working on “Interstellar” with fondness. He remembered his fascination with the topic and being warned by screenwriter Jonathan Nolan that his brother would snap up the project if he dropped out.
“I was involved with ‘Interstellar’ for a year … and I became fascinated with it,” Spielberg said. “I spent a lot of time at the [Jet Propulsion Laboratory] in Pasadena, California, talking to the scientists there and the aerospace engineers.”
He added: “I actually hired Chris Nolan’s brother [Jonathan] to write the first and second draft for me, but it didn’t stick. Jonah actually said, ‘If there comes a point where you decide not to make this movie, I can tell you who’s gonna grab it. He’s already bugging me about it. And that’s my brother Chris.’
“He was absolutely right,” Spielberg admitted. “The second I decided not to make it, Chris jumped on board, probably the next day. ‘Interstellar’ was a much better movie in Chris Nolan’s hands than it would have been in mine.”
The director swap on the beloved 2014 sci-fi epic was touched on earlier this year by Nolan himself. In a conversation with Timothée Chalamet to celebrate the anniversary of the film, Nolan recalled his excitement for what his brother wrote and how he wanted to incorporate some time travel elements he’d been working on when he came aboard.
“Right after we collaborated on ‘Dark Knight,’ my brother [Jonathan Nolan] got the job and went to work with Steven [Spielberg]. He worked on it for a lot of years,” Nolan said. “It had incredible ideas and moved through all these different iterations, but until Steven was ready to make it, whatever it is, it never quite got that momentum. Steven went off to do another film, so it became available. I had a lot of conversations with Jonathan over the years and what he was doing and what his ambitions was. I was excited by it.”
He continued: “I was incredibly struck by his first act. I had been working on a time travel idea … things looking at time. I had half-baked projects that I hadn’t committed to. When it became available, it was a case of me saying to Jonathan, ‘How would you feel if I took this and tried to combine it with some of my ideas and change a bit with what it was?’ He was fine with it. He could tell the spirit of what I was trying to do was to get to what he was initially excited about it.”
“Interstellar” landed in theaters back in November 2014. It pulled in $681 million worldwide and netted five Oscar nominations. Although the film was more mixed in reviews than Nolan’s previous Batman trilogy, it has endured the test of time and become one of the most beloved sci-fi epics of the century.
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)
movies
3377 readers
31 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Christopher Nolan is quite overrated. Interstellar was shockingly dumb. I think he has gotten to a point where either not enough people are honest with him when his ideas are really stupid or his ego simply doesn't allow him to listen to people.
He strikes me as one of those creative types that work best when someone else has a handle on them. Like how when Stephen Moffat was allowed to run DW he ran it into the ground with very Nolan-esque writing, but the episode that he wrote under Russell that introduces the stone angels is just one of the best episodes of doctor who.
I dont think RTD was the stabilising influence, given the number of shitshows that came from his own time as showrunner.
I never liked how he tried to make the doctor/companion relationship romantic. Its a sensible line the show has which was never crossed except when he was running it.
Could you elaborate?
Almost all of his films are gimmicky as hell, and have barely anything outside the gimmick.
Oh, man. I have a list. Although it's been years since I watched it, so my memory is hazy.
That whole thing where he just stumbles upon his old friend who is coincidentally in charge of this space project and just decides he is the right guy for the job? Fucking dumb writing.
Anne Hathaway's character and her speech about love? God-awful writing.
All those weird planets they are visiting, just to show off some weird space shit? Stupid writing.
The insanely idiotic decisions these supposedly highly trained and intelligent characters make again and again? My god, what idiotic writing.
Him flying into a black hole, discovering the fuckth dimension is fucking love and pushing some books off his bookshelf back in time? I would have walked out at that point, but I watched it at home.
And that's only the shit that pissed me off so much I can still remember it all these years later.
Nolan makes movies that are visually amazing and because he can try out weird stuff they are sometimes great, but acting like he's the best thing ever who can do no bad is ignoring all the really, really stupid stuff he does in his movies and I think Interstellar is the worst, with Tenet being a close second.
Yeah, all of the comments here praising the accurate science, and I'm thinking "did I see the same movie?"
@state_electrician @movies I loved Tenet (although admittedly being able to follow only a ~1/3 of the story and twists), but Interstellar was indeed underwhelming except for the imagery/cinematography.
Lol what?
I think Interstellar is his worst movie. I generally really enjoy his movies.
That's my opinion on Oppenheimer
It's a good movie. Just... flat in some way. Hard to describe
The worst part was the nuke explosion, though. The main theme of the movie
Virtually the second lead character
And it looked like someone filmed a backyard bonfire.
A cool shot. Technically excellent. But not the right effect for the scene
I get the intent, but that was... quite laughably bad. There had to have been a point where people said "it's a cool practical explosion. Just absolutely not fitting for its intent. Let's do it differently"
Barbie was fun, tho