this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
249 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83672 readers
1238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Food delivery robots are struggling to steer clear of Chicago’s bus stop shelters. Within just 48 hours, two autonomous couriers from different companies veered off course and collided with shelters shattering glass and alarming nearby residents. These pair of dramatic incidents come amidst brewing tension among community members and lawmakers in Chicago who oppose the robots’ presence. The crashes also come just weeks after one of the manufacturers announced it was integrating a new mapping system trained on “Pokémon Go” data which is designed to improve navigation accuracy.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What's crazy is, bus stops, and their associated shelters DO NOT MOVE. So there's no need to even detect them if you just code the things properly. The GPS is accurate enough to avoid them entirely using proper mapping. This particular problem should NOT be happening at all, no matter how poor the detection equipment or algorithms are.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What’s crazy is, bus stops, and their associated shelters DO NOT MOVE.

TIL

Someone tell Metro Transit. They make changes to my local bus route every few weeks and it's annoying.

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

LiDAR mostly uses infrared light, guess what's NOT invisible to infrared? Glass. Or just take off the infrared filters from the cameras..

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

They get to abuse public infrastructure to build their stupid little robots tax free, and we get to pay for the repairs with our tax dollars.

Privatize the gains, socialize the losses.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Require them to fix AND pay a fine, or let the city fix it and pay 4x the cost AND still pay the fine. Shit will stop happening quick.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nah the second option. You know they'd fix it shitty.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

They never let a private citizen repair public infrastructure that they broke, I’m pretty sure paying to fix it means the company is paying the city or transit authority to do the repairs.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

"Fixing" something means it has to pass inspection. You can slap shit in with duct tape but you're gonna be out what you paid plus the 4x because your fix was sub par.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago

Seems they're covering it for now, but it's anyone's guess how long the conscientious PR approach will last.

Hansen adds that the company quickly dispatched a team to retrieve the robot and clean up the area. Coco has also launched an internal investigation to determine what caused the robot’s error. In the meantime, it says it’s taking responsibility for the cost of repairing the wrecked shelter.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn't do this.

This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.

[–] C4551E@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

($2 * number of robots * labor cost to install one * labor cost to update and integrate) > (cost of settling potential lawsuit)

publicly traded companies are actually super predictable

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Flip your local bots. Or harvest them for parts aand free snacks, if youre extra cool.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago

That 2$ is subject to cost cutting

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good point. I wonder what will happen when those robots drive towards a mirror.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, they're a bit territorial, so that would be something to see!

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I went to a craft show on a college campus a few weeks ago. The delivery bots kept getting routed right through the middle of the thing. They were constantly hitting the vendor's tables and knocking their products off to the ground. One even got tangled in a table cloth and pulled the entire table over. The vendors were not happy.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Has anyone ever pinned one of these down and pooped in one?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I haven't been able to catch one yet, but God as my witness I will find one and when I do, I will fill it to the brim with my butt chowder.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

this was a bit ago but was kinda funny.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does it mean pokémon go players also routinely crash into bus stops?

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have no doubt the training data includes drunk players, so yes!

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

And kids on heelies swerving all over.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

They will remove bus sheltors then is the only solution

[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Watching the robot cheerfully veer into the glass panel like a drunk on a lawn mower absolutely sent me. My sides.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The crashes also come just weeks after one of the manufacturers announced it was integrating a new mapping system trained on “Pokémon Go” data which is designed to improve navigation accuracy.

Oh, great, so Nintendo is logging where its players are traveling and selling that data?

[–] BillyCrystalMeth@slrpnk.net 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Niantic. And always have been

[–] sys110x@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm surprised how many people didn't realise this. I used to play Ingress, which was also from Niantic and similar to Pokémon Go but involved agents and hacking POIs rather than Pokémon trainers and Poké Stops.

Niantic discussed at the time that this was to support their work on the N+1 navigation problem, although I can't for the life of me find a quoatable reference for this. I played Ingress knowing that my location data was being harvested thinking it was to solve a problem.

I also wonder how many people realise Niantic Labs was started as a Google internal startup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niantic%2C_Inc.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I joined Ingress during the closed beta, and technically still play, incredibly rarely. Before they started monetizing it with boosts and extra item storage and stuff, it was a really cool, unique game. Meet up with other players of both factions and either blanket the town and spend a couple hours hacking every portal high enough level to give good gear, or battle live for control of real locations. I once fought off a couple by myself, the three of us frantically running around a playground/park for like 90 minutes. Good fun, good exercise too.

When PGO was released, and the swarm of new players to effectively the same game (same backend, same locations, just a different visual and Pokémon instead of Portals and Lore) lots of places got bitchy about people coming around and not buying stuff, getting very Karen about the situation. Pair that with the desire to cash in on both games, and then tightening the requirements and restrictions for android (for a long time, I couldn't play because I was running GrapheneOS).

I still fire it up when I think about it and have some time, but I haven't been to a meet-up in over a decade, even longer for an official event. I'm still level 8, so I can interact with all items afaik, but my stats are basically a time capsule of a time forgotten.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The levels go up to 16 now.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah but as far as I know no items (resonators, busters, power cubes...) go higher than 8

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago

They have a third data farm in Pikmin Bloom. Wait, does Pikmin Bloom still exist? I did that for a couple months and lost interest.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

That's kind of the point of those AR games. It's been obvious from the beginning.

This is a surprise to no one, assuming you have been paying attention.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

My sibling in Talos, did you really think these AR games weren't going to include tracking user movements when the ENTIRE POINT of the game is to be in specific places and they go out of their way to make sure people aren't spoofing gps?

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago

If a AAA game is free-to-play, then you are the product and your data is being sold.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

A pair of glasses maybe?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

So you're saying we can sabotage the robots and improve public transit infrastructure at the same time?

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

THEN they NEED to have ultrasonic sensors, activated at .. say .. 1/2-metre intervals, because LIDAR may be blind to float-glass that isn't at a right-angle to it, but SONAR isn't blind to sheet-glass.

_ /\ _

( the things might harm the hearing of animals, hence the limiting it to a chirp-every-1/2-metre idea: minimize noise-pollution that we are "blind" to, see? )

[–] mikerr@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why is the glass so fragile ? I'm sure they used to have a bottom metal frame

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's tempered glass, so it doesn't need the support. It also means that it's designed to shatter in a way that prevents sharp edges. That robot has a lot more power than a human when it hits the glass. Tempered glass does weaken after repeated strong impacts, so that could potentially be part of it as well.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Does the robot have any sharp bits? Tempered glass doesn't require much force if using, say, a broken bit of spark plug.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It’s not like shattered bus shelters were a huge epidemic before this so it seems like the city already found a good balance between cost and safety.