this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
382 points (98.7% liked)

science

26450 readers
638 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 7 hours ago

I thought this was being tested a couple of years ago?

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Kinda hard to make male contraceptives. Women are naturally infertile for most of the time not spent actively ovulating. They are permanently infertile during pregnancy, real or synthetic. But men? We're always churning out swimmers. When that process stops, something has gone very wrong.

So, artificially induce a naturally occurring phenomenon vs artificially terminate a constant mechanism.

[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 hours ago

Well not with that attitude!

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago

It is more difficult, but still worth working towards it.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

…in mice, after massive, cancer-causing doses, probably.

I'm tired of hearing about this shit. Put it to market or stop talking about it.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Yeah just push it out to public. Just like they did with women's contraceptives.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I have a different solution, its called being a transbian :3

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How so? Unless you remove testicles, or your partner is also a trans person, you're still 100% able to have offspring together

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I was being more silly than serious :3

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Hehe alright!

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 20 hours ago

This kind of news is an annual event at this point.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I just use my personality. Seems simpler.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 21 hours ago

The new stuff is reversible

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 121 points 1 day ago (19 children)

That's great but I've been seeing articles like this for decades so I'll believe it when there's an actual working product you can actually get

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 4 points 21 hours ago

Scientists at Cornell University

may be

closing in

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Easier to target one egg cell than millions of sperm germ cells.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sure. But the demand is here on both sides, not just one.

Male contraceptives allow men to have reproductive agency beyond condoms and vasectomy, and they can be used in couples where women prefer not to use non-barrier contraception for health reasons or personal reservations.

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

My situation right here. Condoms suck, vasectomy is too much, and birth control isn't on the table. Please give me a pill already.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't they figure that out with Vasalgel?

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

If it did, you'd think it would be promoted, like at all. I never hear about it.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 78 points 1 day ago

Cool. More options for reproductive agency are always welcome.

[–] Takashiro@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Last I heard there were some of these contraceptives moving into clinical trials, the ones with gel in the vas deferens,

Anyway it is irrelevant for regular people, because it isn't available and probably won't be within 5 to 10 years if lucky. Maybe it would be relevant if it had a chance of being available in 1 to 2 years , even then who knows how expensive it would be or how long it would take to be accessible, as in a lot of doctors doing it.

[–] Scirocco@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Vasagel, based on an Indian product called RISUG

Noone funds it because it's too cheap? No real profit potential?

Essentially -- it's a gel that's injected into the vas def which doesn't actually block the flow totally (which sometimes causes side effects like granuloma in vasectomy), but rather it disrupts sperm cell membranes, but allowing the remains to pass through.

It is reversed simply by flushing it out with saline.

Last time I donated to the project it was at the live rabbit trials stage with Parsemuns Foundation?

(OH WAIT IT HAS BEEN USED IN HUMANS IN THE USA (see wired link below)

RISUG was used in humans for like 20 years with good results I believe.

Really don't understand why this one hasn't gained traction.

https://www.planaformen.com/vasalgel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_under_guidance

https://www.wired.com/story/male-contraceptive-contraline-vasalgel-hydrogel/

(Ohh right the rabbit study was for reversibility)

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5381074/

load more comments
view more: next ›