this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
187 points (99.5% liked)

World News

55353 readers
2967 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

And thats why they need to cut NASA's science budget next year, so they can fund a few weeks of war with Iran.

Science is great and all, but habe you heard of bombing people for no reason?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

If we can only comprehend war in economic terms then we have already lost everything that makes a society worth preserving.

[–] null@lemmy.org 2 points 3 hours ago

But Kamala laughs.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 45 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Seems like they did not include the damage to infrastructure in the surrounding countries and the economic losses worldwide. This reads more like military expenditure to me. The actual cost of this war is MUCH higher.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

$500M/day would represent roughly 1000 megawatts of solar farm, per day. Depending on where said farms are located that could power at least 250,000 homes. For the next 25 years. Per day.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 12 points 7 hours ago

A steady demand and generation would eventually drive down the costs (unless there's a resource scarcity), generating jobs, industries and r&d. In addition, it would also drive down power costs and with it make power-intensive production cheaper, which might retrofit into solar generation costs.

And the longer I think of this make-believe magical world where politicians do sensible things that help us, the angrier I get on our shitty reality.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] classic@fedia.io 10 points 6 hours ago

I don't need healthcare. A shareholder somewhere getting wealtḧier is its own reward thankyouverymuch

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

At over 1 trillion per year, we get about 3 billion poet day. So only 1/6 of regular, planned spending.

[–] homes@piefed.world 8 points 7 hours ago

This could fund so much daycare and healthcare and food and housing assistance…

[–] Tja@programming.dev 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Does that include losses (1 AWACS, at least 5 F15)?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The article answers that question.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 5 hours ago

I guess I'll never know, then...

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 8 points 8 hours ago

Cost of residential solar install in CA is 30k.
$500M/$30k= 16,666 solar installs on homes a day. Around 60,000 people a day. Getting free energy for the next 20 years.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And that doesn't even include the cost of a caring for a new cohort of traumatized service members with inadequate counseling support and fewer resources for jobs and housing back home

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

or the next generations of terrorist going against Americans around the world

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 hours ago

There’s some estimates that are considerably higher. Some of the official estimates calculate the cost of the object at the cost at the time of acquisition ie in 2010 a tomahawk cost $10 million but today it will cost $20 million (numbers only for example). Or they used v1 bombs at $100k but they retired them and will replace them with v2 at $400k.

The math is wobbly, to say the least.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago

The “Fuck you, peasants” war

[–] atropa@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Low on amo and rockets