this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
35 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

41504 readers
1238 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

How many weeds did you inject?

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Will you bite the hand that feeds you? Will you stay down on your knees? I have found you can find happiness in slavery

Yes these are Nine Inch Nails lyrics, they slap. Op needs to do a lot more drugs

[–] amne@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

if you don't find that kind of life worth living, stop supporting the system. if you support a system that enables you to use drugs and listen to really old music, then i guess you find it worth living for.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe it's all the drugs (did more than enough, long ago) but I'm genuinely unsure what you're trying to say. It doesn't take a lot of institutional support to get high and listen to music, I get a vague sense you think I'm supporting something and find that hypocritical. Care to elaborate?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Naryaskant@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

We had something like this in our philosophy class.

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Think of a kind of life you think is worthwhile. If there's a system that you know, from experience, supports that kind of life, then it makes sense for you to support that system.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Ontological tautology, yes.

[–] SamemaS@lemmy.wtf 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No, it’s not a tautology, it’s a pragmatic principle.

A tautology is a statement that’s true by definition and doesn’t add new meaning (e.g., "A circle is round").

An ontological tautology would be:

A system that supports the kind of life one thinks is worthwhile supports the kind of life one thinks is worthwhile.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's how I read it, which is why I said that. Appreciate the explanation. ✌️

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

If you can only support one of two systems, for example: the first you know, from experience, supports a worthwhile life; and the second you expect to support it even more, though without empirical evidence; which should you support?

Which would you support?

Is worthwhile enough, for a life? If worthwhile isn't enough, then, by definition, is it not worthwhile? Is enough the level at which anything more is without merit?

I suppose it does "make sense" to support the first system, even if it also makes sense to support the second system. Yeah, it's tautological (it makes sense to do things that make sense to you), but I think it's still an interesting point to make for the questions it raises!

[–] SamemaS@lemmy.wtf 2 points 6 hours ago

Which of the systems allows for you to pursue your ideal system - an activity which you would probably add to your definition of a worthwhile life?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Is familiar hell better than unknown heaven?

Fun fact: communism worked great for 65,000 years in Australia, so it's way more thoroughly tested than capitalism. Capitalism started a mass extinction event in only a couple hundred years!

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Can you elaborate on the Australia communism thing

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It makes sense to tolerate it. Not necessarily support it.

[–] Naryaskant@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago

Then you're finding it worthwhile to support a system that allows for you to merely tolerate it

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

“Don’t be surprised that people still Stan for capitalism”

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Nah...

I know a couple kids that were abandoned by their parents when their cult left the country, because the cult would have faced scrutiny taking all the kids.

Those kids grew up, and started a cult.

It's a "benevolent" cult, and from what I know pretty easy going and actually work thru things...

But all the guys who started it, grew up in a cult. It's what they know, it's normal to them.

They legitimately don't understand why some people freak out about it. And they call it some weird cult-speak term instead of "cult" like that King of the Hill joke. But it's 100% a cult.

Are they hurting anything?

No

But they'd have been a lot better off going to therapy and recommending it to people that need it than starting a cult.

The "system" they knew was cults, and that's not a good system to actually help people.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Cult is just a word for small religions. Jesus started a cult and people don't judge him for it anymore.

[–] Naryaskant@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

OP didn't say it was good or bad. Just that it makes sense for them because they thought it was what they like.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What if the system you know doesn't make sense to you?

[–] Naryaskant@lemmy.today 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's not the question. The question is just if you find it to enable the kind of life you value. If your experience is that a system doesn't do this, don't support it. This isn't that complicated lol

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 3 hours ago

Then OP ought to change the second "to" to "will" to avoid confusion.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's not what "makes sense" means tho...

If you're out of gas, it "makes sense" to go to a gas station and get gas, that fixes the problem

If your parents beat you, it doesn't "make sense" to beat your own kids because that's what you think a normal home life is. You're still doing something illogical, and it's not fixing anything.

We can understand why past experiences and trauma make someone make the choices they do, but that doesn't mean it "makes sense".

Fuck man, I understand what trump does a lot of the stupid shit he does, that doesn't mean it "makes sense" just that I can follow his illogical reasoning.

Same with those people who started a cult.

[–] Naryaskant@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The "makes sense" in the op means that from the perspective of the doer, it makes sense. OP is not saying that it's "objectively beneficial to all humans".

It's a description of how people make choices.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe that's how they meant it...

Maybe that's how you interpreted it...

Lots of people also think vaccines cause autism, and when they say it, they mean it. It doesn't mean they're right, it just means they're willing to put effort in defending their erroneous position.

Someone replying over and over till the other person gives up, doesn't mean they're right. Often it just means the other person gave up explaining and likely blocked them.

[–] Naryaskant@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense for me to interpret what OP said in that way because I find logic and reading comprehension worthwhile for life.

[–] Pinetten@pawb.social 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This guy always blocks everyone that shows him he's wrong about something.