this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
138 points (91.1% liked)

politics

29286 readers
1890 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats spent the last year asking where their Joe Rogan was. Hasan Piker is one of the few left-wing figures with the audience they covet — but the party is deeply hostile to the spontaneity and independence that make figures like him appealing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Democrats are shit but God what I wouldn't give for politics to no longer be a playground for twitch streamers, failed TV actors, retired sports stars and podcasters. Anyone with a mic and inflammatory hot takes can be a political force majeure without any risk, effort or leg work.

Even though they're both influencers, I respect the shit out of Kat Abughazaleh for the bare minimum fact that she's actually out there organizing and helping her community. Hassan can say similar stuff from his $2.7m mansion but that doesn't mean he deserves the same respect.

[–] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 101 points 3 days ago (10 children)

The party wants a “Joe Rogan of the left” so they can focus on controlling one person to drag millions of people along into whatever fresh hell their billionaire donors are cooking up. Just like the Joe Rogan of the right.

I do not want there to be a Joe Rogan of the left.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that what they actually want is "Joe Rogan of the middle" and they already have that in the form of basically every single newscaster that isn't a magatard.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 3 days ago

magaturd, please

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Just like the preferred establishment candidates, they want an empty vessel with no political ideology they can fill with money and operate like a puppet to sheepdog for their own purposes.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well actually the party is composed of many different people, a variety of backgrounds, and many of them don't want a Joe Rogan of the left because they know that it's just b*******. But it's a cute idea to pretend that they do.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I think it’s clear “the party” here is referring to top party leadership. When people say “Washington holds negotiations with Moscow”, do you object that, in fact, very few citizens of either city were involved?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Loce@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The thing is the Democrats today are nowhere near the left, more like right center, while MAGA is far right.

I just don't think "Dems" really exist. People left of MAGA just vote for Democrats because it is what they have to choose from. People who want communism or socialism or social programs or just more fallbacks all want them in varying ways. People say "corporate Democrats" which is basically the majority of what the democratic party has represented for the last decade. A lot of people want to reform what the democratic party is because it is the only structure that exists so that's why people want to primary everyone. In the end though that means that a corporate Democrat, and all those other groups are voting to replace the same people, but they don't have the same views/wants. So there is no one person that would be an agreeable spokesperson for all of the various beliefs. Someone who believes the means of production should be owned by the people will never agree with someone who believes the means of production should be own by private entities. So they would be shitting all over each other's "spokesperson" or whatever.

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 days ago

Exactly this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yea Ok, but Hassan only cares about clout. That's it. He found his grift on the left and has capitalized on it. Any attempt to build coalitions, lift up the left or acquire power for the movement is undercut by his need for more clout. He's not the ally the movement needs, but a peak representation of superficial rhetoric that the left seems to be drawn to these days. The medium is the message or whatever

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

Yeah they already have a Hasan Piker, his name is Hasan Piker

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (88 children)

The party is deeply hostile to anything that questions capitalism and the status quo. They're shooting themselves in the foot, again, by wanting to push Hasan away as a messenger. He clearly appeals to a certain demographic under the left's umbrella.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

agreed, they want a coalition sized vote without acknowledging any of the concerns having that size of a vote needs. Bunch of spoiled rich crooked babies who refuse to do the hard work of leading.. and then they repeatedly lose and try to blame everyone else for their lack of attention to the voters who dont feel represented.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (35 children)

I think this is a good take from the Sam Seder crew regarding how new media operates:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BACFyzIjehQ

Because of media fragmentation, two things. First, the vast majority of people do not know who Hasan Piker is. It's a big fragmented media landscape, so most people don't know who "everyone" else is in the media landscape. If you listen to Meidas Touch or Don Lemon, you probably have no clue who Hassan is.

Second.. People get whatever content they are going to get from whichever podcasts or news programs they like, and in general, they like the personality of the people they've developed trust in to give them the news or media analysis. People who know who Hassan is, they like him.

It's a form of positive selection bias. People like who they know and they know who they are because they like them. It's why they've come to know them.

The Hassan derangement syndrome thing is real and it brings no one to the table. It only serves to appease a small group of donors and only hurts the Democrats.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Amanda Litman (who runs the Run For Something organization) just wrote a nice piece about the Hassan vs Democrat Party conundrum:

(substack, I know, I know)
https://amandalitman.substack.com/p/build-a-bigger-tent-wait-no-not-like

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (86 replies)
[–] itistime@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Piker is an act of a conservative’s idea of a leftest

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pretending Democrats wanted a Hasan Piker is a neat way to spin things.

Democrats never wanted Hasan. They are a liberal party, and Hasan is a staunch anti-liberal. Why pretend like he was ever wanted by them?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 16 points 3 days ago

They never wanted Hasan, but they definitely wanted someone like Joe Rogan. I remember the talk around it as the 2024 presidential campaigns were really ramping up.

They don't want to be challenged. They want a cheerleader who will help rally people to vote for them without actually having to change their positions.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Democrats spent the last year asking where their Joe Rogan was.

I have never once heard anyone say that before reading it here. Rogan is an ill-informed person that uses his significant audience to spread misinformation and modern day mysticism against actual science while at the same time gives a platform to some truly horrible people.

Why on Earth would Democrats want that for themselves?

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Democrats want a moron?

load more comments
view more: next ›