this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
310 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29145 readers
3336 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

'Fire this idiot'

Followed immediately by "arrest this criminal".

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Trump knows that when he orders the military to fire on American citizens, Hegseth will enthusiastically pull that trigger. He would launch a nuclear weapon if Trump wanted him to. That kind of unquestioning psychopathic loyalty is incredibly valuable.

Hegseth isn't going anywhere, he's one of Trump's core players, like Bondi or PeeWee Himmler.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Even if that weren't true, the idea that this type of open corruption is grounds for firing in a Trump admin is laughable. Trump himself is far more corrupt, and hegseth being corrupt just goes further to ensure his loyalty. He can always have Bondi do a selective prosecution of this should he step out of line.

It's basically kompromat that only Trump (through control of the DOJ through Bondi) can use.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't forget Bondi wasn't even their first choice. Bondi is just who they used because they couldn't get Matt Gaetz the position. Someone he could blackmail into doing anything because they already have the evidence that he trafficked and raped a minor. Gaetz assistant pled guilty and is in prison with a shortened sentence (14 years) with the agreement he would testify against Gaetz. Both Florida and the U.S. put the files in a drawer and essentially labeled it blackmail and let him walk free until they need to use it against him. He wasn't found not guilty, wasn't even tried, they just put them in a corner and said... Maybe later.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 35 minutes ago

That is an entirely accurate assessment of the situation, with one small clarification:

Joel Greenberg wasn't his assistant, he could be better described as a wingman/ concierge/ pimp, sort of a Florida Trailer Trash analogy to Epstein/Trump.

Greenberg was the Seminole County Tax Collector, an elected position, that oversees tax collections, obviously, but also the DMV, and Elections. So it's a powerful position, with a lot of room for corruption.

One of the things that they did was take underage girls into the DMV after hours, and let them root through barrels of old licenses, looking for ones that resembled themselves close enough that they could use them as fake IDs.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

The only fire Hegseth understands is fireball.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Trump has been using his position in office to enrich himself in both terms…. What are they gonna do to Hegseth?

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Depends on whether daddy granted his permission.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 hours ago

or gets his cut of the robbery

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

"Under fire"? Man that sounds serious. What are they actually firing at him, though? Like how is he being penalized by being "under fire"? What does that mean?

[–] slemptastrophe@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago

It's like when a corporation gets "SLAMMED" for some anti-social act, or policy. It means theyvare being criticized for it, but the accountability ends there.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

It doesn’t mean anything. These headlines might as well read, “quell your rage, educated masses: the bad people are finally getting the negative attention they deserve, so put down your pitchforks…”

It’s a slow drip of hope that consequences are just around the corner. It keeps uprisings at bay. Until decades later people realize, “wait a minute… how’s this guy running for President? Wasn’t he ‘under fire’ for some shit not long ago?”

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 30 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hegseth should serve life in prison.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Hegseth should serve life in a drag show?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

He'll enjoy that too much. Drag queens are hilarious.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 27 minutes ago (2 children)

He’ll enjoy that too much.

Do you not know who Pete Hegseth is?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 minutes ago

Yeah, he's a treasonous PedoCon, a member of the party that crashes Grindr whenever they gather. He's obviously compensating.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Bryon Noem can give him some tips.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 103 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

Yeah the editor toned down the quote in the headline. The actual quote from the article was:

"Firing this drunk idiot is the bare minimum. @PeteHegseth should be prosecuted."

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 24 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah it's probably not going to happen until after the Republicans are out of office and someone can fix the DOJ.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 18 points 9 hours ago

Republicans being held responsible and suffering consequences after leaving office? That's a funny joke, but I've already heard it.

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

even if at some point the rule of law returns and they will prosecute, this unhinged piece of shit would rather murder-suicide his whole family than assume any responsibility and consequences

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm cool with him pulling a Goebbels.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 59 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

reached a new "height of criminality."

This is base level of criminality now.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah this isn't even nearly as many felonies as Trump had prior to be elected.

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Out of a cannon into the sun

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That requires more energy than shooting him out of the solar system.
I'm all for energy efficiency!
Nice side effect: he has more time to contemplate the reason behind his long journey.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Alternatively, launch toward the sun, include a solar power tracker, and track and follow the trajectory for science/physics class work!

Based on trumps speed and position today, calculate where his bloated corpse will be in 9 hours, the length of a workday, which is something he never personally experienced, but tried to make worse for the average person.

Double whammy of learning about history and science!

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

9 hours, the length of a workday

Laughs in European.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean I’m including the hour lunch there or it would be 8.. pretty sure y’all aren’t working substantially less than that..

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 59 minutes ago

Fair enough, that does change things. 7.5 is pretty standard, but I've generally been contracted for 7. Which is significantly less than 9.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What about the peanuts farm?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago

I'm always so angry when this gets brought up. He loved that fucking peanut farm and he gave it up! That's how much he cared about the American people. We didn't deserve him.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 9 hours ago

So this is the limit? Money? Of course.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Someone more knowledgeable clarify this to me ?

"Pete Hegseth tried to make a LOSING insider trade on his advance knowledge of Trump's Iran war plans, which he advised to start," Grant Stern, managing editor of Occupy Democrats, posted on X. "This is the height of criminality and incompetence."

How was the trade losing ? whatever stock it was went down ? was it something akin to weapons manufacturing ? and if I understand correctly, it was expected to go up because of their involvement in the "war effort" ?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

There are ways to make money when stocks go up, of course, but there are also ways to make money when stocks go down. We don't know the details, but the bottom line is that he bet one way, and the market went the other.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You can gamble on whether a stock price will rise or fall. When going to war, stock prices for war companies rise because they are expected to get a lot of business, but if that call to war is suddenly canceled, then the stock price for that company decreases.

If he made a losing bet, one of two things happened:

  1. The value of the stock was going to drop way below the value it started at, so he would earn a large payout on that gamble.

  2. He was funneling large amounts of money to other insider traders.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Thank you. I didn't know that was possible. How do you do such a gamble, practically ? Is it something that banks offer, or something you can do from a smartphone app ?

Additionally, how does #2 work ?

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You can get a brokerage app, exactly what app and how they work are dependent on your region.

#2 just involves knowing the right people.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Don't have to be a good criminal to do crime! Dude's an amateur at insider-trading!

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 8 hours ago

Even I think I could do better, after an internship at the white house

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Martha Stewart did this shit. You might argue she is more competent than Hegseth. And she went to prison.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

That was in the before times when actions of the rich still had some consequences.