this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
597 points (92.3% liked)

Political Memes

11519 readers
1474 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago

Controversial take: Pit the workers against each other while the boss takes even more time off.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 141 points 5 days ago (44 children)

A society should always prioritize its weaker members. Children are among these. The flexibility given to the parents is not a gift to the parents, but to the children.

[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 54 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Regrettably, this focused flexibility has an unintended side effect. It makes people with children less desirable in the job market. If it is a universal right, then it has the effect of pulling those with kids into parity with the non parents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago

From each according to there ability, To each according to there need.

People with children need more from society, as long as those people are also contributing as much as they are able, they deserve to have that need me

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] Doom@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

I think we all should get more guaranteed time off to just enjoy our one finite life.

I think if someone needs to come in late/leave early/go home unexpectedly we shouldn't have to justify it because we are adults (so long as we get our assigned tasks done WHO CARES). If we can't meet work goals I think we should (as again - fucking adults) have a conversation with our team/manager to handle it.

I think if we are sick we should be given time and space to recover. It's not our employer's business how, what, or why (that includes not requiring an employee to see a doctor or get a FUCKING DOCTORS NOTE). When it comes to sick time I don't care if someone is taking care of themselves, their sick child, their elderly parents, or their chihuahua with a broken leg, they shouldn't have to explain it, they shouldn't have to justify it, and it should be given identical time and grace.

I don't think that unmarried or childfree people should have to cover all the holidays because ThEY dON't HaVE fAMilY. That's cruel and untrue and heteronomative. And if you have ever said this to someone, stood by while someone else said this, or benefited from someone using this logic to make the same person/people work EVERY holiday please know I think you are a trash person.

I think management/the owners/corporate will give us all as little time as they can get away with and LOVES it when we segment ourselves into in- and out-groups that fight over off-time like it's a resource the workers control. We don't. Don't let them convince you we aren't all in this together and that we don't ALL deserve more free time.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 5 days ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago

I have kids, worked full time as a parent for 25 years and no problem with this. Set the baseline flexibility and treatment good enough to accommodate parents. You don't need to take it from childless people to give it to parents. Not a zero sum game here.

What I do have a problem with is hostility towards parents, and hostility towards non-parents. We are all in this together, and it's not frivolous to raise the next generation, someone did that for you. Nor is it selfish to just live your own life - work should not demand our whole lives.

Now that my kids are grown, I still work at a flexible employer, and use that flexibility for doctors appointments, errands to places only open during working hours, and concerts & shows. Would I defer to someone with a child or aged parent with an emergency? Yes. Would I defer to someone with no kids whose partner was having an emergency? Yes.

[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (3 children)

This thread is so fucking sad to read. All of you are workers squabbling over the basic dignity to have paid leave from work. You all sound like slaves, justifying your lashes. What if, and I know this is radical, we enabled all workers to have as much flexibility as possible over how they are productive with their labour?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago (13 children)

ITT: people thinking that offering everybody the same flexibility means taking that flexibility from parents

smfh

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hot take, company executives should get as little flexibility as the employee at the company that’s awarded the least flexibility.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I love these wholesome debates. Let's not hate on each other as we fight over scraps from the Master's table.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think this question pits parents and others against each other, when it shouldn't. Parental leave is necessary to raise a child. But at the same time, workers in general need leave for mental health among other things.

I also think this is more of a problem for places like America where leave is really, really unfairly distributed and there's basically no worker protections. There should be plenty of medical and annual leave, as well as government support in case medical leave isn't enough to get better.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

This was basically my response too. We need to unite, not allow ourselves to be pitted against each other. I know that some people mistakenly believe it is unfair for parents to get things like tax credits, but that’s just confusion.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes. But blame the bosses, don't blame parents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 32 points 5 days ago (7 children)

And non-smokers should be given as many breaks as the smokers!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago

Yes, fight among each other and leave us millionaire bosses alone 🤑

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Everyone should have the freedom to take care of their lives when they need to.

This includes being paid a salary that doesn't keep you on the edge of poverty and ruin.

This should be the lowest bar legally. The fact that minimum wage isn't tied to inflation was inconvenient decades ago, now it is actively harming everyone in the US.

There are more labor protections that we need (see: EU countries with functioning democracies) but pay and leave minimums are the most impactful to the most people's quality of life.

[–] FunnySalt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Mostly I agree. I have no kids and won't (vasectomy), and I'm a bit on the antinatalist side. Not so far in that I think people should never have kids. But reproducing at the rate we do is unsustainable and thus unethical. So there's a bias there.

I do think maternity and paternity leave should be given. And some grace should be allowed for small things. Like having to come in a little late or leave a little early for having to pick up/drop off kids, that kind of thing. To a point. If it's causing more than a minor burden to coworkers, then that's a problem.

But getting preference in scheduling, time off, etc? I don't agree with that. I shouldn't get the short end of the stick because they chose to breed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Not quite the same formulation, but I've read the argument that paternal leave should be equal to maternal leave, and that both should be mandatory, because otherwise it creates an incentive for companies to hire men rather than women who might make use of maternity leave. I can see a similar argument for all workers, so that there isn't an incentive to hire people who will never have children over those who will.

Of course, all of these scenarios presume that any companies would willingly provide any leave whatsoever, which is already a fantasy. A company will only provide as many benefits as it is forced to, and a functioning regulatory state is the only entity that could force such compliance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

A lot of parents in the comments here. I do believe that there are some concessions that parents should receive, but there is a noticeable imbalance in the flexibility given to parents and non-parents.

I think that paid parental leave is something that parents should receive over non-parents without question. You are being given that time to recover and raise your infant. In my country, it is even paid by the government to the employer so that they can pay the employee.

The thing that irks me is when parents get priority for leave requests etc because of their kids. My wife and I have missed out on family holidays because our employers have told us that parents get priority for leave during school holidays. Ignoring the fact that our families are travelling in school holidays because there are children in our family.

I have been told by employers that I cannot start an hour early today (in a job that has no client facing role) in order to leave early for an appointment. Yet there are people sending the “out of office for an hour to pick up the kids” message every other day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Check out the crabs in the bucket.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Option C, watch the comments degenerate into warfare while eating popcorn.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Of course childless people have needs too and deserve workplace flexibility. This post smacks of looking into your neighbor’s bowl though. If you don’t have all the additional obligations that come with parenting, don’t claim to be the same as those who do. Whatever life concerns you also have: your own health, aging parents, mental wellness, pets, etc etc etc parents ALSO have on top of kids. So get the workplace flexibility you need without crying about what parents get. If you know, you know. And if you don’t know, you really don’t know (but your mother does).

I’m so fucking sick of being looked at like a prodigal slob for being a parent. SMfH. Here we are taking swipes at each other instead of focusing on the employers. Good job playing right into their hands. Fuck.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

And everyone should have a stable home, healthcare, good paying job, etc.

[–] E_coli42@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No because they have different needs. Society should focus on providing people based on their needs, not how much they produce. Only a slave bases his worth on his productivity.

[–] teuniac_@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (39 children)

Flexibility is a pretty broad term. The point is that having children can give parents a special excuse to ask for flexibility. But there is important stuff going on too in the lives of people who don't have children, but they don't have this special excuse. The need stays the same: flexibility

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] sen@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago

Just because you want to spend Christmas with your kids doesn't mean I should have to skip Christmas with my family just because I've chosen to not have children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I don’t know about this. At face value it seems like someone saying whaaa I want a day off too if my coworker has to take time off to take care of a sick kid or something. These are not the same thing.

If some other event like a school cancellation outside a parent’s control puts them in a bind it isn’t their fault.

Society has decided that parents should care for their kids, so people tend to bend in that direction. It will likely never be the same for a childless person. If someone needs time off, ask for it off, but they’ll always be up against that.

That all said, I agree with how shitty work culture is that people don’t have access to guaranteed, penalty-free PTO and instead argue over whether or not a parent should have time for a kid because of the inequality regarding the childless not having the “excuse” of kids.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lycanrising@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

i’ve thought about this a few times since having a kid and it’s made me realise that the most important change is the confidence to say there is something that work must be flexible over.

for example, it is a dealbreaker to me that i must be able to drop and collect my child from school. so my manager and i have spoken about arrangements that allow that to happen.

but it’s that same kind of confidence that someone without kids could bring to the table and say that wednesday is guild night and they need to leave early for it. i mean it doesn’t sound “socially acceptable” but i think that if having kids or religious observances allows you to say “i need this flexibility” you should have the confidence to demand it.

and if your manager is someone who only respects religious or family demands id also condone saying it’s for religious observances and taking no further questions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 10 points 5 days ago

As a haver of kids: Sure, why not? I'll take some smoke breaks as a non-smoker, too. I'm saying this unironically or whatever by the way, that second part isn't supposed to be a gotcha or anything. I'm also a worker in the US so I'm biased, used to workplaces that go the extra mile to try and squeeze every ounce of both productivity and humanity out of you. Give everyone all the flexibilities!

load more comments
view more: next ›