this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
114 points (97.5% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2531 readers
59 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...things need to change, or Toyota, the world's largest car company by sales, "will not survive."

...If Toyota feels like it's losing ground, then the ground is probably moving.

The problem isn't just one thing, either. It's everything, everywhere, all at once. Chinese automakers are gaining ground quickly and setting a new standard for manufacturing costs. Software is becoming a core part of cutting-edge vehicle. Tariffs are still a thing. The auto industry has seen more upheaval in the last few years than it did over the last several decades...

Toyota has always had extremely strict quality standards...But that could soon change.

The brand is implementing something that it calls "Smart Standard Activity." This is meant to slash...quality standards...Toyota believes it will lower the price of its components...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

A good hockey player plays where the puck is. A great hockey player plays where the puck is going to be. -- Wayne Gretzky.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

So, they're going to just make cheaper gas cars to compete with EVs?

[–] teft@piefed.social 68 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I bet if someone just came out with some simple cheapish electric cars without all the fancy bullshit then their sales will increase. Stop screwing over your customers and maybe they’ll replace their 15 year old cars.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Aptera is currently making their production intent vehicles for testing and validation. The price has snuck up thanks to Trump’s economic — and literal — world war, but it’s still more affordable than others. It can also charge up to 40 miles per day on solar alone, so cost of ownership should be very low.

[–] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I've been keeping an eye on this: https://www.slate.auto/en

Stripped down, simple, no touchscreen bs, and the vehicle is customizable through their website. Pricing and ship dates are going to be announced next week if I remember correctly.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it looks like their pricing is creeping up into "regular EV" territory. I like the concept and hope I'm wrong.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

What "regular EV" has pricing in the mid-twenties?

[–] Milksteaks@midwest.social 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate that slate is backed by Jeff Bezos I'm sure he'll find a way to fit some spyware or ai in there. I really can't see him backing it for altruistic reasons

[–] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah damn, I didn't know that goblin ass bastard was involved. Welp, not wasting my time with that.

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 1 points 6 days ago

If the car fits your needs, don't let the dude sway you from it. You'll find it to be pretty exhausting to find something that fits your desire perfectly without any issues.

The important thing is to support EVs to help normalize them and drive them forward. I'm sure your ideal EV will be out there eventually, maybe that company feels it's risky to do so right now.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

Hate to tell you this but all car OEMs are run by goblin-ass bastards.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Steve@communick.news 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Cutting features doesn't cut costs as much as you might think.
LED strips are very cheap. Going back to real buttons costs more than touchscreens, not less.

Chinese vehicles are so much cheaper for lots of reasons from cheaper labor generally to actual under the counter government subsidies.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

Chinese EVs are cheaper because the components are made in the same country, often in the same city, and perhaps in the factory down the street. Transporting stuff costs money and forward-thinking industrial planning can reduce these costs.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But don’t you see? I need my car to cradle my balls. They just didn’t do that in the old cars.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Toyota fucked themselves over by having super rightwing leadership who were willingly blind to the ways in which being super rightwing makes you a dumbass.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 29 points 1 week ago (13 children)

☝️

Everyone has seen the way forward, the Japanese automakers put their fingers in their ears and went "na na na na!" for years. Now Korea and China are way ahead.

Conservativism is a disease for any society.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago

Japanese automakers put their fingers in their ears and went “na na na na!”

Katamari damacy?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 6 days ago

But how could they foresee something like EV, especially chinese ones, which were years in the making??!!

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Conservativism is a disease for any society.

Yes, it is essentially a contagion on societies and it is growing like crazy right now. We must understand this threat for what it is.

Too many people look at the US and think we are uniquely stupid when the difference is our conservatives are more empowered and worshipped than in other countries. It is a dangerous mistake to think there aren't rightwing fascist ignorant assholes who want to turn your country into a place like the US no matter where you are, anywhere on earth.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Drivers want affordable electric vehicles. If you still cant do that profitably, you have no business being in the automobile industry.

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The industry that has been pumping the brakes really hard for decades is now complaining about their competitors being ahead on the road. Crocodile tears.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

Other top offenders include Volkswagen, which collects demographic data (like age and gender) and driving behaviors (like your seatbelt and braking habits) for targeted marketing purposes; Toyota, which features a near-incomprehensible galaxy of 12 privacy policy documents;

Hard to care when they're evil.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago

Oh, Toyota will not survive. For a moment there I thought he was acknowledging the existential risk to global civilisation caused in part by his company's products.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Have the consequences of under investing in EV tech and over-reliance on the nonsensical USAmerican economy caught up with the world's largest car company?

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Toyota did nearly nothing for E-Cars. So of course they will fall.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It was so frustrating to watch too since they did so much for pushing hybrids. They were the face of the “eco car” and they could have pivoted to fully electric and people would have just gone with it.

Instead they pulled a Sears. Sears had the catalog business down and would have destroyed upstarts like Amazon if they wanted to pivot to online sales, instead they stuck their head in the sand and suffocated.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Bet Sears will outlive Toyota haha (my local one is still open believe it or not)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

So Toyota's plan to compete in a changing world is to... copy Chrysler (Stellantis)?

No wonder they're worried for their future.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good. Good riddance to bad rubbish, they actively worked to stop, and then to slow the EV transition. They still make shite EVs.

May they be soon forgotten.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's always hard to take these things seriously. We only made 8 billion dollars last year, so we're really struggling.

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

At the same time, the sentiment common in this thread way overstates things. Toyota is continuing to make profits at this very moment, and has the cash on hand (and future profits) to be able to afford to pivot slowly.

If the future is all battery based EVs, there's no reason to believe that this particular company won't survive the transition. They have the supply chain already in place for batteries and electric motors, and have been public about batteries being supply constrained so that they believe that building hybrids with smaller capacity batteries is a better use of that existing supply. It's a self-serving position that one should be somewhat skeptical about, but they're such a huge company they have to think about scale in a way that smaller manufacturers don't have to worry about.

They've been talking a big game about not wanting to make the switch until battery tech and volume gets up to its standards, but they can actually afford to wait. They talk a big game about waiting for solid state battery tech, and while other companies can't afford to wait another 3-5 years for mass production to catch up, Toyota actually can.

And, even before then, Toyota is slowly pivoting to EVs anyway. Their plug in hybrid lineup targets some of their most popular models (Prius, Rav4). On the all-electric front, the bz is available today, and the EV Highlander and the EV Lexus ES are going to be competing side by side with the hybrid counterparts (with the ES selling at a lower MSRP than its hybrid counterparts and the Highlander expected to do similar). They can afford to actually test the market to see whether sales volume data informs how they allocate production resources to EVs versus hybrids.

I expect they'll survive. They probably won't find their way back to #1, but there's plenty of reason to believe they'll still be selling lots of cars profitably in 10 years.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To heck with anyone promoting fossil emissions over EVs.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Here’s to hoping the whole dealership model crashes & burns as well.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, a car Is still something I have to look, feel and drive before I shell the moneys.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can test drive a Tesla at a Tesla showroom. You can test drive a Rivian at a Rivian showroom. You can then buy one of them for exactly the price listed on their respective websites. There’s no haggling with sales people, no negotiating over random features, etc.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait, so what do you mean with dealership? Not the kind of shop where you can see and feel a car and then buy it? And you'd need staff anyways.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Do you not understand the concept of a car dealership? You can not buy a car directly from Toyota or Honda or Ford, etc. Prior to roughly 2010 it was illegal in all 50 US states to sell automobiles direct to the consumer. If you wanted to buy a new car you had to buy it through an independent dealership, which is basically a middleman that tacks on various fees, etc. and tries to upsell add-ons.

Part of the way they make money is to not publicize the actual amount you will pay but instead publish the MSRP and their dealership markup. Then they’ll pretty much force you to negotiate that, along with haggling over optional accessories, trying to convince you to finance the car through them etc. So you may not even know the final cost of a new car until you spend hours haggling with them and commit to buying it.

One thing Tesla did right is to get rid of that independent dealership model and sell direct to consumers. You can go to one of their showrooms and test drive a car, and if you decide to buy one you just go onto the website and order it. The price on the website is exactly what you’ll pay. No dealer middleman is adding unnecessary fees just to sell the car to you, and nobody is pressuring you to finance through them etc.

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

A lot of these legacy automakers have to deal with a supplier network, too. EVs will also need those relationships, but it will likely be with different companies, and cause some friction in broken relationships. The company manufacturing fuel pumps might not have the same future as the company manufacturing wiring harnesses.

[–] sprack@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I understand the sentiment but it’s also intended to make sure there is a location with parts and people trained to repair the vehicles they sell. The cost reduced alternative may be worse.

load more comments
view more: next ›