54
submitted 9 months ago by pr06lefs@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Is there a term for that phenomenon where someone gets so far into a topic that they become unaware of how much contextual knowledge they have about it?

Then they write some inscrutable technical docs, use unexplained acronyms, or tell a story about “he”, "she’ and/or “they” where you have no idea who they’re talking about.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Okokimup@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago
[-] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago
[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

relevant

Relevant XKCD

Edit: is there no way to get a thumbnail to render this, can the image be found and linked to rather than page?

Edit2: can we get a bot that autoconverts links and stuff to this, people would just have to remember to input the image url not the page in which it appears

[-] zzzz@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

I see the image!

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

![relevant](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/average_familiarity.png)

*[Relevant XKCD](https://xkcd.com/2501/)*

Use the format as given here without the backticks like this

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
  • uncommunicative/inarticulate
  • jargon
  • abstruse
  • overspecialized/hyperspecialized/overeducated
  • genius/crackpot/eccentric
  • ignorant (of their comparative knowledge to regular folks or other professionals who are noy)
  • lack of self-awareness
  • echo chamber
  • ivory tower (dweller)/
  • out of touch
  • élit(e|ist)
  • academic ;)
  • for talent: blindly gifted
[-] oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 9 points 9 months ago
[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I would say that someone is "in too deep" or something about "contextually saturated" or "contextually normalised".

[-] TeaHands@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

There probably is an official term, but "bad communicator" also works.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Incommunicado

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 9 months ago

'not seeing the forest through the trees'?

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1467 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS