this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42572 readers
242 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Citing national security fears, America is effectively banning any new consumer-grade network routers made abroad.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has updated its Covered List to include all foreign-made consumer routers, prohibiting the approval of any new models.

For clarification, the FCC says this change does not prevent the import, sale, or use of any existing models that the agency previously authorized.

That Covered List details equipment and services covered by Section 2 of The Secure Networks Act, which, by their inclusion, are deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to US national security.

According to the FCC, this move follows a determination by a "White House-convened Executive Branch interagency body with appropriate national security expertise," in line with President Trump's National Security Strategy that the US must not be dependent on any other country for core components necessary to the nation's defense or economy.

Its determination was that foreign-produced routers introduce a supply chain vulnerability which could disrupt critical infrastructure and national defense, and pose a severe cybersecurity risk that could harm Americans.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Your options for a new router will be Amazon or Google and you will like it. Also it will be 19.99 a month from your ISP. And you have no control or access to any settings in it.

Also it will be 19.99 a month from your ISP.

I expect a tiering system. Free tier allows a maximum of five connected devices and integrates ads, gold tier removes the ads, platinum tier upgrades to 10 connected devices, diamond tier gives you 5G and unlimited connections.

[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 7 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, I think this is less about how secure foreign routers are and more about inserting their own backdoors in citizens hardware for surveillance purposes.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Next it's going to be mandatory for US router manufacturers to leave a hardcoded backdoor for feds to use at any arbitrary reason.

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

for feds to use at any arbitrary reason.

For the safety of the children you mean /s

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 8 points 20 hours ago

Oh yes. That's what I meant to say. Silly me.

[–] captchacrunch@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I genuinely thought that was already the case

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It is. CALEA has been around for a long time, and it's surprising to me not many people are aware of it

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Consider what the media feeds the masses, and it becomes far less confusing. Not everyone checks out TechDirt.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago

If I recollect right they had some backdoor intents for nvidia AI chips.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how they define "router" as any device with two network interfaces can be made into a router.

[–] compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

Noooo, FCC, this isn’t a router, it’s just a computer with 6 network interfaces

[–] Steve@communick.news -1 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I think you actually need 3.
Otherwise there is no real "routing" just "in here, out there" and vice versa.

[–] FrederikNJS@piefed.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

The "routing" can still refer to routing to devices attached via a switch. So no need for a third port to qualify as a router.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Technically you only need 1 interface when using VLANs. Basically any device with a CPU and NIC can be a router.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's a router if it operates on layer 3. Most WiFi routers only use two interfaces (ISP side and WiFi) and yet they are routers. They also provide a later 3 firewall.

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 19 hours ago

But several devices can connect to the WiFi side.
Counts as multiple endpoint devices.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

FCC and Executive Branch unilaterally try to**

That said, I don't have the money to try to import an unapproved router for personal use and then find/hire lawyers sue when its seized in customs, and am uncertain what arguments could be used in-court to affect this issue beyond for, maybe, myself ending up with a product I honestly don't plan to use, but there has to be a way beyond begging Congress-Critters for some basic crumbs of Illusion-of-Choice-masquerading-as-Consumer-Rights ... right?

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Buy a mini-PC and install something like OPNSense, PFSense, or WRT, etc.