this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
48 points (96.2% liked)

Gaming

4642 readers
215 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I haven't regretted ignoring that nvidia even exists when I'm in the market for a new GPU.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I switched to linux and suddenly my gpu doesn't work, guess they dont want me as a customer 🤷

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 0 points 11 hours ago

Honestly the amd 6000 and 7000 ones are pretty legit

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 17 hours ago

As if nvidia and nvidia’s shareholders considers gamers to be customers in 2026.

[–] Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is slopvidias blizzard moment "dont you dumbfuck wage cattle own phones"

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like some words may have been added to that "quote" over time

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago

the additions make it sound more appropriate to how they see us

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 16 hours ago

Because I still value human artistry and AI is not going to change that.

[–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.zip -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Such a thing said by a game studio that can very well decide to not use it, feels like wanting to ride the wave of backlash.

Keep your artistic integrity, that I believe will become a very big selling point sooner or later.

As for players, I seriously doubt many could afford two 5090s just to run that crap, probably not even one if the AI bubble doesn't burst soon so prices can go back to normal.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 5 points 12 hours ago

I don't know, I don't detect bandwagoning from their statements. They sound like real, genuine hatred.

Speaking to PC Gamer in comments the pair have since posted in full to social media Oshry and Dusk developer David Szymanski argued that DLSS 5 isn't just an optional trick folks can ignore, but something that should actively resisted.

"Please tell me what generative AI has anything to do with Deep Learning Super Sampling - which is what DLSS actually stands for in case anyone forgot," Oshry said. "They're hiding this Gen AI bullshit behind the DLSS moniker because they think we're stupid...They know if they called it something like 'Nvidia Generative Upscaling' the public backlash would be immediate and intense."

In the developer's eyes, DLSS 5 amounts to "fundamentally changing the way video games look based on artificial intelligence that's been trained on Instagram models and Epstein memes", leading him to question the point of making game art in the first place.

If I saw these comments on a Lemmy post, it would fit right at home.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You can just not ship DLSS 5 in your game…

I don’t see any need to boycott this, especially not as gamers, as you can just disable DLSS 5 if you don’t like it.

I interpret this statement from New Blood boss as fear that their games without DLSS 5 won’t compete well against those with it available.
I don’t share this fear, as there was often new technology to art stuff more easy, like digital art, electronic music, digital cameras, higher resolutions etc.
It always made the traditional art style more valuable not less, as people are motivated to pay a premium for “authentic” art.

So my conclusion: Art that is targeted at mainstream / big quantity / fast release cycles has benefit in AI and has to use it to stay competitive, but in the other hand mainstream art has always been live-less / unhuman anyway, so I am not very sad about this.
“Real” Art that is done by Artists for themselves not made to be like by as many people as possible will grow in value and maybe even get more popular again as people may get fed up from re-iterating art that works (e.g. pop songs)

[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Why would I pay for something and then disable it?
Also you have the most Dunning Kruger take on art I've ever seen.