$375m?
$375 fucking million?
For how many hundreds of millions of children did Meta harm, and to pay a fucking pittance. Fucking CSAM is a slap on the wrist for the rich.
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
185 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
83032 readers
2943 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Which is why I'm all for killing anyone who enables this shit. I'm so fucking tired of being manipulated by the rich, who's causing harm to millions of people, but as long as they get more money, the don't care.
Well guess what: I don't care about you, and I would happily become a martyr if I'd have the chance of taking you down with me!
I know this comment will be deleted due to "community guidelines", but here it is: kill 👏 the 👏 rich👏!
We need to enact age verification laws to protect the kids tho!
Who're we protecting them from? Apparently not the people doing it.
I guess the crime was worth it for Meta
Ah. Of course it's New Mexico. Don't know, but I'd bet there's a statutory cap on judgments. Like around $5,000 a criminal violation, regardless what it is.
Meta sucks, but not for the reasons claimed by the state. It's bad for everyone's mental health, and the best fix shouldn't be apology money and undoing end-to-end encryption but restructuring with robust parental controls and making it so it doesn't constantly encourage you to interact with strangers.
We should be glad that tech comoanies are finally getting some warmth on the arse about this.
Dear reader, I'm not sure if you follow Chris Hansen's podcast, but he currently has a series in regards to the ongoing investigations into Roblox and their alleged and apparent housing + protection of pedophiles.
That's really awesome. Go Hanson!
...But not X/Grok for actually creating CSAM?
I'll take the win against Zuck, maybe the Elongated Muskrat should be worried?
Were they part of the case? Did this trial start before that even happened?
Your sentiment makes sense. But what you wrote is illogical when you consider the timelines.
AFAIK, lawsuits about grok were just filed in the past few weeks.
Exactly. Justice is not fast food. It takes more than a few weeks or even months to go through the steps.
Yup. If that case is over within two years it's because of shenanigans
It's entirely likely several teams of lawyers were waiting for this ruling to create precedent.
Jury trials do not create precedent. Think about it. You're a judge or lawyer. Are you going to leave something as incredibly consequential as precedent up to 12 untrained hill folk?
I love seeing Meta take it in the ass, but this seems like it could be a building block for future age/ID verification laws.
Zuck has that cash between the cushions of his couch. This is hardly a fine. It should be 10% of income. That will make them obey fast.
While a win, it’s pocket change for Meta, who will be further disincentivized to fix the problem when even a loss is so cheap.
Jurors found there were thousands of violations, each counting separately toward a penalty of $375 million. That's less than one-fifth of what prosecutors were seeking.
Meta is valued at about $1.5 trillion and the company's stock was up 5% in early after-hours trading following the verdict, a signal that shareholders were shrugging off the news.
Juror Linda Payton, 38, said the jury reached a compromise on the estimated number of teenagers affected by Meta's platforms, while opting for the maximum penalty per violation. With a maximum $5,000 penalty for each violation, she said she thought each child was worth the maximum amount.
Seriously need to up the maximum fine
Seriously. When downloading an MP3 carries a fine of $30,000 to as much as $150,000 per download, damages of a measly $5,000 maximum for facilitating, enabling and even encouraging child exploitation is beyond insulting.
You're comparing federal and state laws is part of the reason. Feds carry the big stick