this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
14 points (93.8% liked)

Climate

8469 readers
502 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A pub in California is pulling carbon dioxide from the air to carbonate pints. If the business model works, it could give the broader carbon-capture industry a boost.

The New York Times now requires about 1/10 of people clicking a gift link like this one to register in order to access the article. You can either:

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Someone just discovered recycling?

[–] Jimny_Crkt@slrpnk.net 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This isn't really storage... All of that C02 will be released when that beer is opened and consumed.

[–] matsdis@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

But I don't drink alcohol, so when I buy the beer the CO2 remains captured! Now I just need a very large cellar. Would the beer store more CO2 per volume than balloons filled with my exhale? So many open research questions, affordable carbon capture breakthrough any time now! /s

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Beats having to use another source of co2 and letting all this be in the atmosphere anyway ig?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 15 hours ago

The dissolved oxygen has to leave the beer somehow to get the yeast to produce alcohol. You could use some energy-intensive process to remove the oxygen, but otherwise it naturally gets turned into the CO2 beer drinkers expect. And I doubt that energy-intensive process would be worth it in the end.

Though maybe the naturally present oxygen isn't enough to make it as carbonated as consumers expect, and more air or CO2 is pumped in to make it more carbonated. In that case using captured CO2 instead of letting the yeast turn some more of the wheat into CO2 would make a difference.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

However much carbon could be put into one bottle is much much less than the carbon released from the creation of the beer