Climate

8474 readers

293 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

There’s a New Place to Store Greenhouse Gases: In Your Beer (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A pub in California is pulling carbon dioxide from the air to carbonate pints. If the business model works, it could give the broader carbon-capture industry a boost.

The New York Times now requires about 1/10 of people clicking a gift link like this one to register in order to access the article. You can either:

Register — you don't need to pay — but you do need to give up an email address
Open the gift link in a private browsing window or use Reader Mode
Use an archive site such as archive.today to skip the paywall entirely. Be aware that archive.today sometimes modifies archived pages, and all archive sites generally fail to correctly save and render interactive features and multimedia content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Beats having to use another source of co2 and letting all this be in the atmosphere anyway ig?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

The dissolved oxygen has to leave the beer somehow to get the yeast to produce alcohol. You could use some energy-intensive process to remove the oxygen, but otherwise it naturally gets turned into the CO2 beer drinkers expect. And I doubt that energy-intensive process would be worth it in the end.

Though maybe the naturally present oxygen isn't enough to make it as carbonated as consumers expect, and more air or CO2 is pumped in to make it more carbonated. In that case using captured CO2 instead of letting the yeast turn some more of the wheat into CO2 would make a difference.