this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
44 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

2026 readers
49 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“The people that are the most susceptible to the corporate bullshit tended to choose the worst solutions to those problems on a consistent basis,” Littrell said.

Hmmmmmmmm.

Well that goes some way partially to explaining why management at large corporations almost as a rule are uselessly incompetent.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a programmer. I'm literally paid to think. The number of times I've had to attend a corporate wide event and been asked to just not think about the shit they are spewing is unacceptable--and every time the sales guys just lap it all up.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh interesting I thought the job of a programmer was to be paid to fix AI slop vibe code made by clueless management who would have done better by coming to you and asking you to think in the first place.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Littrell noted the workers who participated in the study all came from highly educated backgrounds in HR, accounting, marketing and finance, had bachelor’s degrees and even PhDs, which shows the findings go beyond simply assessing the intelligence of the study participants.

Actually, I'm not convinced that we've managed to eliminate that hypothesis. The only group that gives me pause is accounting.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 hour ago

“Study finds graduates of programs that require colouring inside the lines do well at colouring inside the lines at work. “

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 32 minutes ago

Additionally: it confuses intelligence with learning. Having a PhD is a sign of the later, not of the former.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

All of those sound structured backgrounds that apply fixed definitions and derivatives based on that. They lack a developed sense of creativity outside the rigidity of their domain and so, are pretty much biological LLMs after a decade of purposed training and instructions.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Sometimes we need studies like this to point out the obvious.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Most of us can see this for ourselves, but anecdotes don't move the needle. So, yes, studies with numbers and charts make a difference, sometimes.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 54 minutes ago

"Gullible idiots: bad at everything? More at 6."

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Morons are bad at their jobs. Who knew?