unmagical

joined 2 years ago
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

Played a "Hell on Earth" run on Killing Floor 3 last, so I'm well and truly fucked.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I find more value in identifying specific policies that I support rather than looking to strictly define a specific term. When a conservative shouts about something being socialist and a chud asks you to define socialism (even in sincerity) there's a trap deployed. Socialism, communism, anarchism, Marxism, Democratic socialism, Social Democracy, etc are such misused and coopted terms that it will be much easier to inform people of general leftist principals than define strict differences.

I want people to be paid according to what they produce. If I make a bag in one hour and get paid $20 an hour with the bag selling for $120, is that fair?

I want people to have access to health care. If a child gets a treatable disease should society care for them regardless of how much their parents make?

I want people to have access to food and shelter. Should someone be allowed to own multiple houses that sit empty when there is anyone sleeping under a bridge or should markets be allowed to discard excess food in locked dumpsters and trespass people who try to get in the dumpster when there are still people who don't get to eat every day?

I want clean water. Should factories be able to dump their refuse in our waterways?

I want clean air and reliable energy. Should electrical distribution be limited to generation from burning by corporations whose profit comes from inadequate maintenance schedules?

I want an educated populous, a free internet, locally sourced food, bathrooms in public parks, a sky and ocean and world free from advertisements, a store walking distance from my house, safety standards for road designs that promote slower speeds and protected bicycle infrastructure, access to gender affirming care, the ability to love who one wants among consenting adults, safe work spaces, equal say in rule or representation, an end to war, the ability to follow any or no religion so long as it doesn't affect another, the right to not be recorded, the ability to scrub my identity from data sets, infrastructure that is maintained, autonomy and relative safety in drug use, autonomy of self even to the extent of self-exclusive harm, among many other things.

There's not a uniform politic that encompasses all that, but a lot of people will agree with a lot of that even if they're not socialist, communist, anarchist, etc. If socialism is left at something like "the masses control industry and government" you're gonna lose a lot of people who for whatever reason just want to be told what to do. If you instead redirect inquiry to whatever good thing socialism can do for your interlocutor you will actually educate them.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

That's some Bibi shit.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Christians really be out here attributing all evil to Satan as if the entire book of Job didn't highlight Satan's subservience to God and lack of ability to act in any capacity outside of express permission.

If you believe God created everything and evil exists you best believe God created that too.

They ain't never read their Isaiah 45:7.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you suggesting that among all the much more significant problems in the world I should spend some of my effort caring about a politician having a table from the people that helped get him elected and help shape his policies (including those on transportation) at a government event to talk about those policies? Or have I just grossly misinterpreted your comment?

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's not a 527, but in a colloquial sense I think it's fair to treat them as such (even if you want to add a "non-electoral" caveat). They endorse, they educate, their members campaign, they have hard political stances, etc.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

I'm sorry, is the primary complaint here that the politician made politics political? I genuinely couldn't care less if the party in power has a presence at party events. Hell, did anyone actually expect the America 250 event to not have a Trump rally happen?

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

Aren't billionaires primarily the ones involved in economic sabotage?

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just writing it louder still doesn't make it true, Dummy.

 
 

May have been obvious to others, but I only caught this detail recently after using Linux for over 15 years.

 

I've never been able to make up my mind on whether or not the character has its hands raised or just has prominent ears. Frankly I prefer to believe they are its hands and the character is quite pleased with its star.

Is there a canon answer?

view more: next ›