this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

News

36694 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The owner of OnlyFans, a site known for its adult content that is credited with revolutionising the online porn industry, has died at the age of 43.

Leonid Radvinsky, who was born in Ukraine and grew up in Chicago, had purchased the company in 2018 from its two UK-based founders.

The site's popularity surged during the Covid-19 pandemic, landing him on Forbes' annual list of billionaires just three years later.

He "passed away peacefully after a long battle with cancer," OnlyFans confirmed in a statement, which asked for privacy for his family.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

$11 million donation to AIPAC. The world has lost nothing of value with his passing.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 35 minutes ago

Agreed. Imagine being so shitty I cheered for cancer…

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 25 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Imagine reaching the pinnacle of wealth and achievement only to have this happen.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And all your money won’t another minute buy. Dust in the wind.

[–] Ageroth@reddthat.com 2 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

Didn't magic Johnson throw money at his HIV to keep it from becoming AIDS?
Pretty sure money can buy better healthcare than is available to the rest of us.

You certainly can't take it with you, but until you go it certainly buys you more time, and that's not even getting into the weeds about just paying other people to do work for you that would otherwise take your time (cleaning, cooking, house and car maintenance...)

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 minutes ago

Yeah. Money gets you the private cancer treatments. Or it gets you on the organ transplant list in all 50 states. Or pays for procedures overseas.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Certainly better than dying before that - poor and sad.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago

I feel personally attacked.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Article doesn’t say when he was diagnosed or what sort of cancer but unless he’d been fighting it was before Covid he probably got to enjoy his success for at least a short bit of time

[–] Jaegeras@piefed.social 3 points 57 minutes ago

Rest in piss.

Thanks for ruining the lives of people who desperately clamored to this awful existence of a company, selling their bodies off to make a cheap buck.

[–] homes@piefed.world 14 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I’ll toss one off in his honor

But one of the first things I learned from the Internet in the 90s is that I will never ever have to pay for porn

Edit: ok, so I get that OnlyFans was more about the eSexWork part of the CumCalculus, but, still, not for me. No judgment, though. In fact, I had some friends that found it quite empowering.

[–] firelight@startrek.website -2 points 35 minutes ago

I had some friends that found it quite empowering.

What's empowering about whoring yourself to the same people that are responsible for why everything is so expensive?

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 7 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

I don't wish cancer on anyone but I also kind of wish it on all the billionaires in the hope that they'd use their unfathomable amounts of wealth and power to "solve" this horrible disease.

Make a new Manhattan project of it. Get all the researchers together, throw money and resources on them until they find a cure for it.

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 2 points 11 minutes ago

Make a new Manhattan project of it.

You mean steal research from other countries under a cooperation agreement and then refuse to share?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

Curing cancer would be the equivalent of the Manhattan project, the moon landing, the mapping of the human genome and the making it relatively affordabl, e the discovery of both antibiotics and phage therapy, and the development and mass deployment of vaccines. It is an achievement demonstrating such wild dominance over the struggles and complexity of the physical world that I think its only comparisons would be to something like establishment of terraformed nations on Mars.

Right now we're still developing cures for the easy cancers. Attempting to cure cancers is big business in both the pharmaceutical world and in nonprofits, and it is working, but it's slow. Unfortunately cancers are made of our own cells so even things like curing bacterial disease don't even really express the difficulty. But it's happening, and general treatments and prognoses continue to improve as well as increasing numbers of cures for specific cancers in people with certain gene presentations.

Sorry about the rant, my mom died of cancer nearly a decade ago and I'm annoyed to no end by people acting like big pharma is intentionally not curing cancer to make more money, when the reality is what I said above.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

Yeah, but then only rich people will get the cure.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 0 points 56 minutes ago (3 children)

The multi billion dollar pharmaceutical industry and health insurance industry would fight ruthlessly against what you're proposing, which we could absolutely do and probably fast.

There's way more money in treating symptoms long term. Curing cancer is bad for business.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

multi billion dollar pharmaceutical industry would fight ruthlessly against what you’re proposing

Hmm, I wonder why people like you never complain about the 'wellness' industry (influences, scam medicine pushers.. etc) which is 5 times bigger than the the entire pharmaceutical industry...

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 36 minutes ago

Cuba has a cure for Alzheimer’s and we keep it contained there.

Hmmm. Hmmmmmm.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world -4 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

It's OK gramps, let's get you back to bed.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 38 minutes ago

Clearly you haven't experienced the US "healthcare" system.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 hour ago

On the one hand...

...while on the other...

[–] firelight@startrek.website 1 points 37 minutes ago

Lol. Good riddance.

[–] dumbass@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Onlyfam will be allowed to attend his funeral.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

And no air conditioning…

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

At risk of repeating myself (just saw this above)

Sweet, NEXT

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

So he didn't do any of the work for originally coming up with the idea or making the site, and then he also didn't do any of the work in making the site's popular content.

I do see there is some risk and some value in investing in a company, but it seems wrong that he became a billionaire when the people who did the actual work didn't. More evidence that we don't need billionaires.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

didn’t do any of the work for originally coming up with the idea or making the site, and then he also didn’t do any of the work in making the site’s popular content

Every CEO ever. Valueless drain through which money is removed

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

their Wikipedia article claims that he bought 75% of the site from the founders, and that the founders were still involved after the sale. Terms were not disclosed in that article, and I am not inclined to search further. But it is safe to assume the founders got their bag.

If this guy came along and made more off their work, who cares? I think those founders made enough that they don't have to worry about paying for porn ever again.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If this guy came along and made more off their work, who cares?

That money came of the backs of the performers, developers, and god only knows how many third world "content screeners" working for dollars a day to keep the site in compliance with local laws.

He didn't just get rich ex nihilio. He extracted that money from other people's hard work.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, that's what owners and CEOs do, make money off the backs of others. (And other body parts, too, in this case). He's no worse (or better) than the others.

That same Wiki article states that OnlyFans claims to have paid out $25B to "creators" as of last October. Ironically, these folks might be getting less screwed than content creators in other disciplines.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Ironically, these folks might be getting less screwed than content creators in other disciplines.

Enslaved on OnlyFans: Women describe lives of isolation, torment and sexual servitude

In one prominent case, influencer Andrew Tate, with millions of followers worldwide on social media, is accused of forcing women in Romania to produce porn for OnlyFans and pocketing the profits. He has denied the charges.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Something tells me that if OnlyFans didn't exist, Andrew Tate would have still found a way to be an exploitative asshole.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If Mossad didn't exist, Epstein would have still found a way to be a pedophile

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If this guy came along and made more off their work, who cares?

I do. That's the thing I am complaining about. People who only contributed money taking the lion's share of the profits.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

But what if the original founders got enough? If we are against billionaires existing, shouldn't we be cheering on folks who find an off ramp before getting there?

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Since I wasn't complaining about the original founders, I'm not sure that this hypothetical is relevant.

What I do know is that a billion dollars is far more money than anybody needs to live extravagantly for the rest of their lives.

[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 1 points 54 minutes ago

I saw the thumbnail and thought Charlie Cox died

[–] manxu@piefed.social 0 points 30 minutes ago (2 children)

For everyone going, "billionaire = evil, death = good," please think the man was just 43. Fuck cancer is the first thing that should come to mind.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

I hear you, but I think “celebrate billionaire donor to AIPAC is dead” still takes priority over “fuck cancer” IN THIS Particular case.

Nature filtered out a real shithead from society.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 minutes ago

Won't someone please think of the billionaires? They're people just like us, deserving of dignity and respect... this man spent six years guiding a machine to squeeze pennies from the lonely and desperate, paying third worlders less than a sandwich a day to meet their sexting quotas, exploiting incel's need for connection with a slow drip of synthesized hope. That has to count for something