this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
104 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

12925 readers
873 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

nice little blogpost where someone reviews music players

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm still on Rhythmbox but at this point it's a hassle to use something else because the metadata (album name, track id, etc) would break. I used to test Amberol, Lollypop, GNOME music 3 years ago and the metadata requires fixing.

I also kind of care with the vanity number like play counts that is already recorded.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn't seem exhaustive enough to be titled "the state of Linux music players."

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

I agree, it's missing so many.

[–] who@feddit.org 17 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This was posted here, and criticized, two months ago:

https://programming.dev/post/44731999

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

Heh, clicked on that and saw my post at the top. That threw me for a second.

As an update, I've since worked out how to get Navidrome working over Tailscale and an Nginx redirect from my VPS, so I now have Feishin installed on several computers, all drawing from the same Navidrome server at home.

It's pretty cool.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

has it been updated since? i always enjoy talking music players

edit: hey! found my old comment! also some folk i think are my dorks from my old college days maybe i hope? if they're using the same usernames that'd be wild and fun. i wonder if i should break out my old cult username.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 12 points 20 hours ago

That screenshot of Strawberry in the blog post really makes it look bad.

Here's a better one

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

I just use Subsonic and stream music from my server sitting literally a foot away

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I like being exposed to new applications, but Elisa should've come up in the author's search as kdePackages.elisa. Especially if you're using KDE (where the Qt UI blends in well), it plainly meets all four of the criteria for inclusion. It's such a major oversight given its popularity.

[–] SigHunter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago

I only need fooyin

[–] kbal@fedia.io 11 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Quodlibet is the one with all the features.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Agreed. It is my player of choice, though being it is pure Python, it uses a lot of resources for a music player. If I was tight on ram or using a slower CPU, I'd probably go with something leaner.

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I absolutely adore being able to click into and between genres and artists to get to albums and songs instantly. I want to ultimately move back to MPD, maybe Navidrome or Subsonic, but... I just love Quod Libet.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

I love that it has proper search queries: https://quodlibet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guide/searching.html
Do other players have this as well?

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

i've always been a "organize everything at the file system level, and just play folders on demand in winamp" type guy... so when i couldn't find a good winamp replacement after switching to linux, i ended up on quod libet and got used to organizing everything via tagging

quod libet was a bit overwhelming at first and forced me to fix a lot of broken tags, but totally worth it.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

I love MusicPod because it looks really nice and also combines local music with internet radio and podcasts, all in 1 app.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I've been using Audacious for years now; it's lightweight and also has no library management but I find I don't really need that. I just point it to any one album on my drive and it plays it.

I have each album saved as a separate 'playlist' which works well for me. I can see people being annoyed with how I have it set up, but I like it this way.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

it’s lightweight and also has no library management

That's the point for me for Audacious. I don't want to dig through my entire 30+ GB music folder, create a massive index or whatever, load all that shit to memory every time I open the fucking program, just to play one album.

"Oh I want this album"> Drag it in
"Oh I want this discography" > drag it in

The only problem is no multi column tab view, and no drag into empty space/designated zone to create a new playlist.

[–] qwank@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Audacious is the only one I've tried and works perfect for me. Load up my whole library and shuffle!

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 19 hours ago

Audacious isn't perfect, but it's far better than the others that I tried. Had been using VLC forever in WIndows, but for whatever reason I kept running into issues that I couldn't resolve, so began a search for alternatives.

The only huge issue I have is when I add more songs to my music directory, I can't refresh the existing playlist. I have to delete and add the directory again. Don't do it a lot, so it's more inconvenience, and everything else works so much better than other alternatives did.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Command line mplayer seems fine to me. I have it aliased to "m" for convenience. Playlists work great (just make a shell script to play the songs you want). Need help getting to sleep? Shell script that sets the volume to barely audible, then plays some long instrumental audios. And so on.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

As all my music is stored on my jellyfin, and since I like the GNOME-isms, I can't recommend Gelly enough.

https://flathub.org/en/apps/io.m51.Gelly

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

Interesting! Gapless is the only modern one and it is fine-ish

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

Still got nothing on Moonshell 2

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

i just want one i can use to sync [only 20 gBs] to my phone, keep my playlists updated, and listen to music. syncing to my phone wirelessly is a big plus, but i am old enough to have two boxes of cables.

[–] SinTan1729@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

I'd recommend using something like Navidrome instead of manually syncing the files.

[–] bootleg@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You can jist use Syncthing for syncing.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

But then you need a player on each platform, that works with m3u files

Which is very few, and buggy.

I use "Anrimians Simple Music Player" and Gapless/G4music, but songs are randomly disappearing from playlists. Also you need to usw default directories for the files.

[–] 01011@monero.town 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] noodlejetski@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

probably due to the criteria listed in the post.