this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
293 points (98.0% liked)

Android

33638 readers
683 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you haven't seen this yet, Google is planning to require mandatory developer identity verification for all Android apps, including apps distributed outside the Play Store, taking effect September 2026. This affects every independent and open source Android developer directly.

This is not just about the Play Store. After September 2026, on any certified Android device, applications from unverified developers will be blocked by default. The only proposed bypass, the "advanced flow", exists only as a blog post and has not appeared in any beta, dev preview, or canary release. No one outside Google has seen it.

The community has been fighting back at keepandroidopen.org:

  • Read the full breakdown of what this means
  • Sign the open letter (organisations only)
  • Contact your national regulators — contacts listed by country on the site
  • Add the countdown banner to your project

September 2026 is closer than it looks. The time to push back is now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I get that you can get around this but there are 2 major problems I see.

  1. Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want to use.

  2. Alternative app stores like F-Droid will never be any more popular than they are today. This raises the barrier to entry so much that we can effectively consider the open source phone app movement to be dead in the water.

[–] Justifier@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Never owned an iPhone

Currently on android purely for alternative os's

Next phones for my family will either be Linux, if they hold the line, or iPhone if no one does

Why would anyone pick a garbage Android device if they're as locked down as iOS and costs as much?

Make it shitty, Google. I hope companies that behave as yours are get the same enshitification ending

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 3 hours ago

The whole tech world is just so frustrating. (in before reply pointing out that it's capitalism causing the frustration - yup)

Some of these "features" and "safeguards" might make sense coming from a trusted entity. Even in the real world with evil Google the changes might help some users who use Google everything and might benefit from being blocked from doing stupid things.

But it's not even close to worth it. They cannot be trusted on their own, and now the influence and access of the US government seems 10x worse than it already was.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Start moving to LineageOS or GrapheneOS now. Plan your next phone purchase on a model supporting one of these. eBay a used phone if you have to. Get out.

[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 4 points 3 hours ago

How advanced are we on the linux phone front?

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Lol imagine if Microsoft had succeeded in controlling the development and distribution of all software used on Windows. We'd all lose something.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Keep fighting this shit.

As to the "flow" thing, it's an extra 2 warnings and a mandatory 24 hour waiting period after you select to install apks from unknown sources. It can be permanently enabled, so the 24 hour wait will be a one and done thing if you choose the indefinite option. Googles stated reasoning for this is to prevent non tech people from falling for scam calls or messages using scare tactics like "your bank transfered out your savings" or whatever made to get people to panic and follow whatever commands they're told to do and install before having time to speak to a family member or contact their bank or card company themselves.

For what it's worth, I think that 24 hour part of it would prevent some people from getting scammed. There's a lot of naive people who still fall for stuff like that.

My issue is that I believe this is just a stepping stone to make it even harder or impossible to side load in the future. Like, a year or so later or whenever Google thinks they can get away with it they'll try removing the option to permanently allow side loading. So right now it will just be a few extra clicks and a 24 hour wait one time, but where will they move the bar next?

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

And then your banking app and phone operator application will refuse to work if you have any of custom apk installed, like they do now if you have accessibility permission enabled for any applications or have enabled the developer mode. (Bangkok bank, AIS)

[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 hours ago

Google: "Only I can make malware apps!"

[–] foodvacuum@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Google is trash. Next phone will absolutely be one of those upcoming graphene supporting Motorola phones. I'll grab an old phone to test out postmarketos too

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

The flow goes like this: Governments make a law requiring verification of devices on phone networks, phone carriers require an encrypted key to connect to the network, that key is only made available to approved OS developers... we need an entirely protected chain.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Welp my next phone will be a used phone up to 2024 manufacturing. My current phone is already a used one, although one of 2018 manufacturing.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How would you test android apps that you develop?

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They've recently announced the flow to enable unverified apps. It's a one time process which will require waiting 24hr after enabling unverified apps but after that 24hr installing APKs will work exactly the same as today. It's annoying Google has single-handedly decided to implement this rather than going through a more transparent method built into AOSP, but if this is as far as they take it I doubt any power users will be seriously impacted. Of course with how Google has handled this I have no confidence that this is as far as they'll take it.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

waiting 24hr after enabling unverified apps

is it 24 hours "per APK" or for all APKs?

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 minutes ago

Once and done. It'll be an option on Developer Mode with a 24-hour cooloff and forced reboot (to disconnect any ongoing scam calls).

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 hours ago (7 children)
[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

This all pointless because the scammers will just have you download their apps from the play store anyways, its not like anyone is maintaining that cesspool.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] inari@piefed.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

Moved to GrapheneOS because of this crap

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is actually awesome. Pretty simple reason: Push more developers to Linux based phoneOS's.

DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS!

They truly are responsible for the value of a platform.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 37 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

The situation has changed recently.

Google backed down from this being mandatory this week. There will be an option to allow side loaded apps but it will require a 24h delay to enable.

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-android-sideloading-unverified-apps-new-rules-3650343/

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 hours ago

Imagine loading a website but you need to wait for 24 hours to be able to access it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›