this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
49 points (98.0% liked)

News

36634 readers
1898 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Trump fucking over the farmers who voted for him yet again

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

All these maga farmers are going to lose their farms to Trump's buddies and then we'll all be paying more for food.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 hours ago
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Oh no the John Deere welfare queens are about to get yet another bailout

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Fertilizer isnt sustainable...

We're gonna run out, but before we do it's fucking up the entire ecosystem.

There's no way to sustain the population we have now, any that thinks we can isn't thinking on the right timelines.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Saskatchewan produces 30% of the world's fertilizer and it's nowhere close to the end yet.

The only problem for America is they have an idjit in power who can't see far enough ahead to NOT tariff the shit out of it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago) (1 children)

Saskatchewan produces 30% of the world’s fertilizer and it’s nowhere close to the end yet

As I said:

any that thinks we can isn’t thinking on the right timelines.

I'm assuming you're talking about ammonia fertilizer tho.

Do you know that process requires fossil fuels?

Do you understand that burning fossil fuels isn't sustainable?

Phosphate and potash are both mined, and eventually we'll run out of that just like the liquid natural gas to get the ammonia. But we need all three in specif percentages, we can't just use any combination, they don't do the same thing...

Continuing to use fertilizer to support an ever expanding population is as sustainable as turning the AC up to mitigate climate change.

It only "works" if you don't understand the problem, unfortunately lots of people get belligerent when they realize they're not thinking thru something.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago) (1 children)

No. Please don't assume. Go find data that backs you up.

Ammonium sulfate and potash are both commonly used fertilizers in agriculture, but they have different compositions and functions. Ammonium sulfate is a nitrogen fertilizer that also contains sulfur, making it ideal for promoting plant growth and improving soil quality. Potash, on the other hand, is a potassium fertilizer that helps plants develop strong roots, resist disease, and improve overall health. While both fertilizers are essential for crop production, they serve different purposes and are often used in combination to provide plants with a balanced nutrient supply.

https://thisvsthat.io/ammonium-sulfate-vs-potash

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

No

No what?

You linked a source saying that ammonium sulfate and potash are different and have different functions...

Which is what I said:

But we need all three in specif percentages, we can’t just use any combination, they don’t do the same thing…

I don't understand what you're trying to disagree with, or what "assumptions" you're talking about?

The only assumption I made was that you were talking about ammonia, but if that's what you meant your link makes zero logical sense...

What are you trying to say?

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We absolutely can sustain the population we have now. The majority of crops grown don't even go to humans.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No we can't...

Even if everyone switched to a full vegan diet and we culled every farm animal immediately, it would be a bandaid.

We're propped up by non renewable phosphate fertilizer and virtually no country tries to reclaim what is used.

I'm pretty sure one small wastewater plant in England reclaims it, the rest gets flushed out to the ocean where it causes further issues and becomes for all intents and purposes irrevocable.

Like, I'm not saying going vegan is pointless, I'm just saying it's the equivalent of paper straws on a global timeline.

We're fucked, and we've been fucked longer than any human has been alive, we just haven't realized it yet.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 3 hours ago

Yes, we can. The issue isn't a lack of resources, it's a lack of proper distribution to where the resources need to go.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

It's sort of bonkers that sewerage treatment plants do create fertilizer as well. It just has to get from the treatment plants to the plant plants.

Also, most fertilizer being shipped around the world is just nitrogen taken from the air, which is an energy intensive process. Hence, the use of LPG.

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

Human sewage is not fertilizer. It's full of drugs, plastic, and who knows whatever else people just dump down the drain. Sure the water gets filtered, but the solid waste is contaminated as fuck all.

[–] nelly_man@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

My city has been making fertilizer from the sewage sludge for a century now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milorganite

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 hours ago

*don't?

But they do. That sludge is mostly spread on non-food fields though, because that would require more treatment than we are willing to pay for.