this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
6 points (87.5% liked)

Asklemmy

53620 readers
198 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Makes excuses not to sympathize. Brings up made up stereotypes about people as reasons not to sympathize.

  • EVERYONE and EVERYTHING is fine in their worldview. Someone is suffering? They deserve it orrr they aren't actually suffering and are just trying to get you to sympathize. There is something extremely wrong going on? Maybe it's time we changed our morals, it's not that bad, really.

  • Doesn't think beyond whether or not it's socially acceptable.

So? There has to be a name for this type of person. I can throw it on their face.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] folaht@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago
[โ€“] mo_lave@reddthat.com 3 points 7 hours ago

Someone I don't want to associate with.

[โ€“] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's a sociopath but they'll probably wear that as a badge of honor. Call them weak instead, clearly they can't handle the strain of basic human emotion.

Weak is the insult that would hurt them. So I am using that for people like that.

[โ€“] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

This is somebody who bends over backwards to support a single idea: humans can do no wrong. It's not fascism because it doesn't sound like there's any side-taking or specific ideology they favor over others. They might be a flavor of anarchist?

The lack of empathy leads me to think that the ideology was built one selfish brick at a time. It's a response to the world, not a governance of it. They want zero responsibilities derived from the actions of others. To a degree, they may have a point: inaction is allowance. If you don't stop something from happening, you're allowing it but it's lacking a lot of nuance. If you accept it as it is, there's no room for obligation. That's freeing which is probably their end goal. Not a good society, but a simple escape from responsibilities.

It's a self-serving ideology.

[โ€“] Kaesekalup@lemmy.wtf 1 points 9 hours ago
[โ€“] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

bigot: a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices

especially: one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot

Many 'types' of people show lack of empathy and callousness and are abrasive. Types don't matter, calling them out on those matters even less. Traits are helpful though and I'd stick with those as a shield to help yourself in understanding and processing why it is that a person makes you feel that way.

[โ€“] astutemural@midwest.social 1 points 10 hours ago

Empathy for others should be a legal requirement

[โ€“] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 11 hours ago