this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
69 points (100.0% liked)

news

24677 readers
842 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Trigger warning: mention of sexual assault)

All unaccompanied immigrant children who are pregnant, many byremoved, are being moved to a single facility in Texas in order to avoid providing abortion services in a significant human rights violation, critics say.

As detainees are frequently moved across state lines quickly, often to red states like Texas, pregnant people are facing challenges accessing reproductive health care in detention centers.

Unaccompanied minors who lack immigration documentation are at high risk for trafficking and other forms of harm, so they fall under the care of the office of refugee resettlement (ORR), which previously had facilities across the country capable of caring for children under the age of 18 who are pregnant.

Since July, more than a dozen pregnant children have been moved to a single facility in the small town of San Benito, along the south Texas border. The children kept in Texas are as young as 13, and about half are pregnant because ofremoved, according to a joint investigation by the Texas Newsroom and the California Newsroom. In Texas, abortion is banned in nearly all circumstances, includingremoved and incest.

“It’s a choice to ensure zero abortions,” said Jonathan White, a former top official working with children’s programs in the ORR under the Obama and Trump administrations. When a pregnant child is moved to Texas, “as long as she is in Texas, she can’t access an abortion – without a federal official needing to deny her an abortion”, he said.

The move amplifies existing concerns about reproductive healthcare in immigration detention centers, including allegations over the lack of appropriate healthcare for pregnant people, separation of nursing parents and infants, and forced sterilization in immigration facilities.

The “total disregard” for the rights of pregnant and nursing detainees is a “dramatic violation” of international law and public health practices ensuring consensual medical treatment, said Diana Romero, professor and director of the Center on Immigrant, Refugee and Global Health at the CUNY graduate school of public health.

Forcing any individual to carry a pregnancy to term is an “egregious” violation of rights, and relocation from other locations around the country to states with more restrictive abortion laws “adds a whole other layer of concern”, Romero said.

White added that “making the decision for these girls whether they will give birth to theirremoved’s baby” is “an extraordinary human rights problem.”

“Everyone attempts to write their politics on the bodies of these children,” he said.

The typical age of pregnant unaccompanied minors is 15 or 16, though they can be even younger, White said. “They’re not grown women. They’re little girls,” he said. Because of their young age, “many of them will be comparatively high-risk pregnancies” who need specialized care – yet it’s not clear whether the south Texas facility, which is hours away from major cities, is equipped to offer that care.

The government does not track the prevalence of sexual assault experienced by unaccompanied girls under the age of 18, but other organizations estimate the rate to be between 80% and 90%, White said. “When I was in the program, about half of the pregnant girls related that their pregnancy was a result of sexual abuse or sexual assault, either in home country or in transit,” White said. Many girls don’t learn they are pregnant until they undergo an exam under ORR’s care.

The office of refugee resettlement is housed within the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), but it is now directed by a career immigration official.

When asked whether the pregnant girls were receiving appropriate care, whether other pregnant detainees were also being moved to states with restrictive abortion laws, and the extent to which ORR is now controlled by immigration officials, HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said: “These claims are completely inaccurate,” adding that ORR “remains committed to ensuring the safety, well-being, and appropriate care” for the children in its custody.

TLDR: ICE is r****g immigrant women and young girls, then sending them to a Texas concentration camp to prevent them from aborting.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There’s never a single cause behind anything but I would not be surprised that an egregious and horrifying amount of sex crimes have been committed and they want to shuffle the evidence around to obfuscate.

[–] Drithvan@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As the article mentions, over half of these cases of these pregnancies are due to sexual assault cases committed by ICE agents.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Those are the ones we know about so far

agony-deep

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

And you just fucking know those kids are disappearing

[–] Vostok_@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago

Satan's embassy on Earth

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And they will be doing what with the babies when they're born?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

Deport them so they can challenge birthright citizenship in the Supreme Court.

[–] rentasintorn@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Sell them for adoption to white couples

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait I thought they hated anchor babies, now they’re forcing girls to have them?

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No such thing as an anchor baby if you don't recognize them as citizens in the first place. Look at them deporting newborns to El Salvador without a second thought.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

I guess the urge to punish women with forced birth supersedes the nationalism.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Drithvan@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

This is the US empire in action.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

forcing babies to be born which they will deny appropriate health care and food to, and try to deport. at a certain point you really genuinely start to believe these people are banking up suffering on behalf of some hideous religion, the most expensive and elaborate system of torture ever devised being extracted on young women/girls and literal babies just because they feel like it.

may this heap of sins be matched by the righteous retribution meted upon the perpetrators sicko-wistful

[–] Drithvan@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago

Its not just the fact that they are forcing these babies to be born.

It's also the fact that these babies are the result of sexual assault committed by ICE officers against women in detention camps.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

death is too good for these monsters, but it will just have to do

[–] Drithvan@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, death will simply have to do.

[–] varmint@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For a second I thought they were forcing immigrants to get abortions and white girls to carry unwanted pregnancies.

This is demonic too. Evil country

[–] Drithvan@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope, just cases of ICE officers r****g immigrant girls and forcing them to carry through with their pregnancies.

This is fucking horrific and demonic.

The thing the colonizer has been doing since they've landed from their boats.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I obviously wouldn't put it past ICE and in fact somewhat expect them to be responsible for much of the abuse, but where does the article say that that ICE agents are doing the r***? Am I misreading something?

[–] Drithvan@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How else would women and young girls be getting pregnant in a female-only detention center?

Couple that with aerial footage of agents taking women into completely shuttered buildings for lengths of time before leaving.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Again, I'm asking where in the article it says it. It says that in half of cases they became pregnant due to abuse in their home country or in transit (i.e. the process of migrating here), so it's clearly not just a blanket truth that they are getting pregnant in detention centers.

“When I was in the program, about half of the pregnant girls related that their pregnancy was a result of sexual abuse or sexual assault, either in home country or in transit,"

[–] StarkWolf@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you are correct in that the article does not explicitly state that they got pregnant from ICE officers or while in detention, and that OP is making that connection based in assumption and prior evidence that may or may not support that conclusion, even if it is a reasonable assumption to make. But I would say that "in transit" could mean during their migration, it could also mean "in transit" as in it happening between their arrest and the transfer to this facility, which would implicate ICE agents in that case. So it's hard to draw clear conclusions, the language still leaves room for OPs interpretation to be true in some of these cases.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Contextually, with it being mentioned paired with abuse in their home country, I think it pretty clearly means while they are migrating. It's furthermore a blatant misreading that it says that any of this happens in "a female-only detention center" as the comment I was responding to mis-summarizes it or that, as OP says in another comment:

As the article mentions, over half of these cases of these pregnancies are due to sexual assault cases committed by ICE agents.

(Emphasis mine)

Obviously ICE agents engage in sexual abuse and human trafficking and so on, but it pretty clearly does not seem to be mentioned by the article despite multiple claims to the contrary being made on this thread. We really should not make a habit of supporting our claims with non-evidence, even less so when actual evidence is readily available because there is years of reporting on ICE engaging in sexual abuse/human trafficking already.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Oskolki@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good and Evil is just something they came up with to avoid justice. And best way to curry out justice is through democratic means and the best means to ensure democracy is education based on material world and scientific process.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago

Democracy caused this.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Oh great, more horrifying news from the Great Satan