this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
211 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

47067 readers
926 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Twongo@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

isn´t this like the 3rd time already? lol I talked to a few MEPs about chat control and other stuff - while the focus was on chat control the EU got this shit sneakily approved

[–] hhg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Why is that bad? The linked article barely says anything

[–] Twongo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

sorry, this should provide more context (german though)

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

Comes back again and again.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

Is this AI generated?

It has an m-dash and uses the phrase "hard facts".

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Around 99% of all chat reports sent to police in Europe come from a single US corporation: Meta. US tech giants are acting as private auxiliary police forces—without any effective European oversight.

Thats very interesting. Assuming that whatsapp is actually e2ee that means instagram, facebook and threads account for 99% of all chat reports. That means all dms on there have been getting scanned. Sounds like people should leave those platforms.

[–] lumen@feddit.nl 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not true for WhatsApp. It has a report function that forwards the last 5 messages in the conversation to Meta when used.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Could it be that the client (who has the keys to decrypt the message) just forwards those messages when the report is sent?

Didnt know that, i think i havent used it for over a decade.

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Or maybe people are mislead by (and putting to much trust in) the term "end-to-end encryption"

Sure its encrypted in transit between you and the person you're exchanging messages with.

But that doesnt mean the Whatsapp app itself isnt scanning your chats on the phone.

[–] RblScmNerfHerder@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Yep. Ugh, garbage companies!

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 13 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The push for Chat Control is heavily driven by foreign-funded lobby groups and tech vendors.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 1 points 3 hours ago

skill issue. have they thought about passing a "russian" (oooooh scary!) NGO law?

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 4 points 20 hours ago

You don't say!

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 day ago

Thank fuck.

For now.

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Once again. In a few months, they'll do the same and this will repeat until the law passes.

[–] voxel@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You didn't even understand the context. It's about a law that already passed as temporarily and is about to run out.

[–] Fossifoo@hexbear.net 1 points 10 hours ago

"Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote" I do love Patrick for all the good work he does but doubt

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

To do this effectively, they'd have to ban facebook/whatsapp, which are the two most popular chat apps in Europe.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

not really. there are several ways they could implement it

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

It'll be back.