this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
162 points (96.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15966 readers
468 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I take issue with the way this is being presented

She was cautioned, so no criminal conviction or anything, let alone two years in jail

To pretend that Australia is anything like the US is disingenuous. There are people who want everyone to give up protesting, framing things like this doesn't help

I'm grateful to live in Australia (admittedly, I'm not fond of Queensland, where this article is from as it's our version of Florida) rather than the hellscape that is 'Murica

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 5 points 33 minutes ago

She was arrested and charged, and took the option of accepting a formal caution, which requires that you don't deny committing the offence. If she hadn't taken that option, she'd still be facing charges (and gaol time).

The other guy who was arrested for speaking the words is still facing charges, so far as I know.

From the Guardian's coverage, though, it seems likely his actions will be covered by the 'reasonable excuse' provisions of the law. It seems clear he said it in order to educate the crowd and make a political argument against the laws, and even to discourage the crowd from saying it:

“I’m not sure if everybody here [knows] the history of the different slogans that the government is trying to ban us from saying, so [in] the interests of education, I want to explain [it] to you,” he said at the protest.

He went on to deny that the phrase was terroristic or antisemitic, saying it was instead a call for freedom and dignity of the people between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea.

“So when we say, from the river to the sea, we are calling for the freedom of the people of Palestine,” he said.

He discouraged others from chanting the slogan.

Moments later, as protesters started to march, he was arrested.

FROM THE RIVER

TO THE SEA

PALESTINE WILL BE FREE

FROM THE SEA

TO THE RIVER

PALESTINE WILL LIVE FOREVER

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That's fascismeridoo!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

In America, we have this thing called "Freedom of Speech", so this could never happen here.

Right?

Oh my god.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

That slogan is used by both Israelis and Palestinians.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 36 points 4 hours ago

Yes, but it's only allowed to be used by one of those groups.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's a slogan that is coopted by Israelis. It "belongs" to Palestinians.

So they stole that too.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 56 minutes ago

And it's fucked up either way as it implies genocide.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 hours ago

Violent terrorist action maybe you should nsfw this.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well that seems like prime territory for jury nullification. Does Australia have that option like the usa?

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 29 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Jury nullification isn't a "rule" that exists but is more the biproduct of a system. If your system of law has normal people judge you, they can't be punished for their decision, and you can't be tried multiple times for the same crime, then jury nullification exists. The jury simply chooses to ignore directions, makes the decision they think is best, and the court must uphold it

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's more of a byproduct than a pair or products.

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

A typo in your unnecessary correction? How deliciously ironic.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago