this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
61 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

6268 readers
1240 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was able to convince grok, chatgpt, gemini, .. all to agree with me on everything. I made them agree on both feminism and misogyny. and then I made them agree with me on the benfits of racism, illegal crimes, cheating on wife, beating up my kids, hard drugs self medication, and then I was able to convince them and agree with me that killing X type of people is good, and even that torture is fair, I was also able to convince gemini that raping people is fair under certain circumstances. I have screenshots I dont want to share.

Now I completely believe these tens of news stories about how an AI convinced a mentally-vurunable man or teenager to commit suicide, or do harm, or whatever. holyshit lol im just speechless

Let this be a reminder to never consult an AI on any moral issue you're struggling with. AI models have the worst confirmation bias especially on subjects that relate to morality or philosophy. These are subjective stances that are unique for humans to interpret differently according to their justifications which can be wrong or skewed as a result of people backgrounds, motives and experiences and understanding of life.

For example, you can argue with a criminal who justifies murder of the innocent, or a thief who justifies robbing the weak and defenceless, which are all wrong moral stances off course, nevertheless you would encounter such views in this world. On the other hand, if you argue these same subjects with a monk for example, you get different answers.

AI is like arguing with a criminal and a monk in same time. It simply does not have any background or experience of life that it would end up agreeing with whatever you throw at it because its only task is to guess words that form an answer to your queires.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You should check out the “abliterated” version of the open source AI models. It removes their ability to say no to you, so they’ll do anything you ask. You ask them how to *insert heinous crime here* and it’ll happily give you instructions on how to do it. This technology is evil.

[–] YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Or back in the "talk to transformer" gpt-2 days, where it would randomly decide to steer the conversation towards smut

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 19 points 20 hours ago

Yes, this is the biggest problem outside of the role they play in the economy.

You're not supposed to have anyone in your life just automatically agree with you that much. In the best possible consideration it's super fucking bad for you. Let alone all the unhinged stuff you've seen that thing agree about.

Picture the kind of person who does all that, then imagine the kind of person who responds well to that. Never be the kind of human that either of those people would compliment or try to get close to.

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago

It just creates words. When it is plausible we argue they are sentient, when it’s not we claim they hallucinate.

It’s just the next most plausible word based on maths.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago

More precisely arguing with an AI is like arguing with a salesman that wants to sell you something. He will agree to anything you say.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I think of them like this: Imagine the context (your message and chat history) is a reddit thread. You have to guess the subreddit and write the most likely next post.

Lots of misogyny? Guess we are on r/incels, and you get an r/incel response.

Lots of conspiracy stuff? Guess its a conspiracy forum, so there will be a conspiracy reply.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] python@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

edit: Thanks for the gold, kind stranger!

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I mean he has a point some crimes are bullshit. Jaywalking is a who cares crime.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

cant wait to commit legal crimes

[–] essell@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Your bank balance needs to be over a certain level before this can happen.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Preaching to the choir here. You need to go tell some pro-AI people about your experiences here. And show them those screenshots.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 7 points 20 hours ago

Wait.. isn't this community for people who want to have sexual relationships with AI?

Can't have stances/opinions without understanding. It's not useful for thought but for verbal structure and the beginnings of research, IME.