this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
105 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

57364 readers
1104 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Readme updated today:

This repository is no longer actively maintained.  

The TrueNAS build system previously hosted here has been moved to an internal infrastructure. This transition was necessary to meet new security requirements, including support for Secure Boot and related platform integrity features that require tighter control over the build and signing pipeline.  

No further updates, pull requests, or issues will be accepted. Existing content is preserved here for historical reference only.  

https://github.com/truenas/scale-build

Wondering if this is just the first step towards doing a minio in the future.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nixx@piefed.ca 20 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

XigmaNAS is still being developed and is a fork of the original FreeNAS code before iX acquired the name.

There are alternatives

[–] SteveTech@aussie.zone 33 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I found a post on the forum:

https://forums.truenas.com/t/scale-build-git-repo-going-closed-source/64313

This is only their old build system which they weren't using themselves, the rest of the OS will remain open source. However they also said some worrying stuff about including "proprietary pieces of the OS".

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

According to their own documentation: https://github.com/truenas/scale-build

The TrueNAS build system previously hosted here has been moved to an internal infrastructure.

This isn't them stopping use of the build, it's them making it proprietary. They are still using it, just not open-sourcing it.

[–] LordChaos82@fosstodon.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

@Ek-Hou-Van-Braai @SteveTech So are they hosting the source code outside of github on their own platform or is it not going to be available at all?

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 1 points 21 minutes ago

Afaik they are hosting their code on their own closed source internal system.

So it will no longer be Open-Source

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

In a years time will the public be able to build trueNAS for themselves without developing their own build tools?

If not then the TrueNAS is no longer Open Source as people can't practically build it for themselves

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Always blaming security bullshit. I anxiously await a community fork.

[–] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 33 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Volker Theile (lead dev of FreeNAS 2006-2009) maintaines OpenMediaVault, based on debian, version 8 was released recently. Not a drop in replacement, and it has its own quirks, but no evil company in the background

[–] skoell13@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

I love it so much that I donaged twice to the project. There are also some easter-eggs hidden in the software, like quotes from Dune.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 hours ago

I'm running an early version of that on a 16 year old ARM board NAS, the NAS has 256MB of RAM and OpenMediaVault runs great on it.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Truenas went to shit when they killed BSD support, the OS it was founded on

[–] lnxtx@sopuli.xyz 15 points 10 hours ago

TIL. Now it's based on Debian.

[–] Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I ordered a TrueNAS system from iXsystems a few years ago, and the reasoning they gave me is that Linux has better driver support, especially for home users who.

Whether that was actually the reason, I have no clue. But that’s what they said.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The reason they gave me is people can run apps with docker on Linux, and docker isn't compatible with FreeBSD jails...

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

And yet they went with K3s at first, a crappy implementation at that, and refused to even consider adding Docker for like a year, then suddenly it became super important to replace their k3s stack with docker in the next release, barely giving people 2-3 months to get all their apps updated.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

K3S sorta makes sense in an enterprise environment but for the small one box use case it's overkill and a pain to work with for little extra gain.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not only that but there wasn't even a notification on the dashboard for me after updating the OS that k3s were being replaced, I found out after updating when my apps wouldn't work. When did I update? About 2 weeks after the migration deadline. Had to rebuild my Plex, Jellyfin and Immich apps.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like notifications from the OS developer in my system, but that would've been a great heads up and a worthy exception. "Hey migrate your apps now or your shit will break" would've worked.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They are very hostile to users and I moved to a pure FreeBSD self managed storage and deployment solution

TrueNAS doesn't add anything to ZFS or what the OS can do. There's a couple graphs and reporting features but the rest just adds more work

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Security through obscurity isn't security.

There goes my excuse for not giving up and just paying for Unraid.

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Unraid pay system switch made me never want to use them

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

you can always just bypass their security.

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

Unraid uses a pretty whacky "license" checking system. There's cracks for it out there that hook into the core license system and use it to generate a valid one for the current version.

One key note is that you HAVE to update the crack before updating Unraid itself.

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 hours ago

Odd choice of timing… I wonder if they are sitting on a cache of hard drives.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Are they lying about secure boot being a reason or can I go back to thinking SB is part of Microsoft's EEE attack on software freedom?

[–] Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

@tabular @Ek-Hou-Van-Braai They are lying. Debian supports Secure Boot and remains open.

Although "related platform integrity" stuff might be something they're being forced to include by a government agency or paid to include by another company.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It can be a bit of both.

I don't think secureboot is an attack on freedom exactly (and it's certainly not an instance of EEE), but I definitely think it shouldn't be Microsoft holding the keys.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Literally today Chris Titus released a video where he emphasized that no one should be using secure boot because the default backend is Microsoft and no one changes their secure boot config.

If that's true there's an argument that the name "secure boot" is hardly detachable from the defaults and thus that name is kid of burnt and shouldn't be recommended out of an abundance of caution for new users.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
NAS Network-Attached Storage
PIA Private Internet Access brand of VPN
VPN Virtual Private Network
ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity

5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 7 acronyms.

[Thread #153 for this comm, first seen 10th Mar 2026, 00:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago

Postgres is used by highly secure environments and has a public build pipeline.

This is bullshit and/or they are lazy.