HybridSarcasm

Congrats. You're a mod now. Have at it.

Congrats. You're a mod now. Have at it.

Works fine for me. It’s you.

This technically breaks Rule 3, since it doesn’t cover a self-hosted service or application. However, “local over cloud” is always welcome here. So, leaving this post up, but locking to encourage discussion in the proper communities.

If you’re not getting much love here, don’t forget the fitness & lifting communities that exist!

I think this is it. Motives can be debated, but I’m convinced the food supply is the real problem - not lack of universal health care. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. What the boomers ate is considered ‘boutique’ or ‘organic’. If we could go back to that food supply chain, I think many of our ailments would go away.

My bad. I meant Matrix.

I think it’s important to recognize what Plex is saying with this announcement: their current business model isn’t sustainable. That means those who already have lifetime passes are vulnerable to Plex going away. If/when that happens, what will those users do then? That’s the conversation worth having now.

I’m curious why Plex wins. In my experience, Plex offers no customization and very few options for changing the UI. My impression is it’s very hard to use if your media includes more than movies or TV.

Interesting. I’ve had nothing but positive interactions, but I visit them on Discord.

Its features are much more than mimicking your browser bookmark functionality.

The most important feature to me is the offline archiving of the target link/page. Link rot is real and content can change. Capturing the site as it is when I link it means the info I wanted is now safely stored.

There’s also the multi-user features. A family can centralize and collaborate on links.

Here’s the Features list from the projects GitHub page.

Features

• 📸 Auto capture a screenshot, PDF, and single html file of each webpage
• 📖 Reader view of the webpage, with the ability to highlight and annotate text
• 🏛️ Send your webpage to Wayback Machine (archive.org) for a snapshot (optional)
• ✨ Local AI Tagging to automatically tag your links based on their content (optional)
• 📂 Organize links by collection, sub-collection, name, description and multiple tags
• 👥 Collaborate on gathering links in a collection
• 🎛️ Customize the permissions of each member
• 🌐 Share your collected links and preserved formats with the world
• 📱 Native iOS and android mobile apps
• 🔍 Full text search, filter and sort for easy retrieval
• 🌓 Dark/Light mode support
• 🧩 Browser extension (star it here!)
• 🔄 Browser Synchronization (using Floccus!)
• ⬆️ Upload from SingleFile (check out the guide)
• 🔐 SSO integration (Enterprise and Self-hosted users only)
• 🍎 iOS Shortcut to save links to Linkwarden
• 🔑 API keys
• ✅ Bulk actions
• 👥 User administration
• 🌐 Support for other languages (i18n)
• 📁 Image and PDF uploads
• 🎨 Custom icons for links and collections
• 🔔 RSS feed subscription
• ✨ And many more features (literally!)

Thanks for this info. I was wrong, I have a CRS320, not CRS310. And, here’s an Imgur album of how things are laid out: https://imgur.com/a/DT3htLJ

Now that I understand the topology better, I have questions about how the VLANs are assigned. Are you using a RADIUS server?

Also, I’m a little confused about the VLAN participation in both switches. I would expect an end client device (like those in your diagram) to connect to an untagged VLAN ports. But, your VLAN assignment screenshots only show your client VLANs on the trunk port.

For example, here’s how I’m doing untagged VLANs on my CRS320:

So, the fact that you can only reach VLAN10 targets from the CSS610 clients makes me think it’s related to VLAN assignment. Yes, it’s different than what’s being observed on your CRS310 clients, but one step at a time.