HybridSarcasm

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I'm a sucker for the USS Defiant (NX-74205)

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

+1 for Renovate. It's not a drop-in replacement for Watchtower, but it allowed me to create a robust CI/CD pipeline. And, it can be centrally run, instead of having Watchtower running on every Docker host I have.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Downvote, hide, and move on. If it isn’t against the rules, it’s allowed.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The biggest concern here would be 1) have you installed the Nvidia container toolkit, and 2) how are you passing the GPU into the Jellyfin docker container.

I’ve got an Ansible-playbook that takes care of the Nvidia stuff. I’ve also got a compose file I can share. Will edit this post when I can provide a link.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As the owner of several X9 boards, I can confirm the answer is ‘no’. Java is the only option for this generation.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

We love open source projects around here. That being said, this web browser extension isn’t self-hosted. Only going to lock the post so others can still know about the project.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Your post was removed because it wasn’t about any self-hosted applications, services, or infrastructure. Instead, you were complaining about the customer support of a VPS provider.

A case could be made that Rule 7 should have been cited, instead of Rule 3.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

This is my strategy as well. Except, I will find the domain on sale elsewhere then transfer it over to CloudFlare.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Set the Immich instance to run as the UID that owns the media files?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 99 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Leaving this here as an example of a low-effort post that just pisses the rest of us off.

 

Due to the large number of reports we've received about recent posts, we've added Rule 7 stating "No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports."

In general, we allow a post's fate to be determined by the amount of downvotes it receives. Sometimes, a post is so offensive to the community that removal seems appropriate. This new rule now allows such action to be taken.

We expect to fine-tune this approach as time goes on. Your patience is appreciated.

9
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world to c/squaredcircle@lemmy.zip
 

Can you use this phrase and NOT be a heel? Seems not.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1147109

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

 

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

view more: next ›