this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
40 points (95.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15905 readers
1003 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Will the current turbulent situation lead to a third world war?

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 5 points 15 hours ago

Probably not because Iran has no atomic bomb.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would argue that we have been in WW3 for a while ... since this whole "de-globalization" started.

World wars are hard to define ... what started WW2? Is there a single moment in time? Was it Pearl Harbor? Was it the invasion of Poland? By the time the Germans Invaded the conditions for world war had already been around for a while.

I'd argue that we're currently in the "appeasement" phase of WW3 ... I just hope that it's a cold and mostly economic war .... and not one with global drafts and attrition (altho Russia and Ukraine already have broken that barrier)

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

“Was it Pearl Harbour?” Tonnes of countries were involved already, it was already WW2 for a while. The blitz of London was started and ended by the time the US was attacked at the very end of 1941. They were plenty happy to let everyone else fight it out and then when they got attacked suddenly they were the altruistic heroes of man.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

our history books (Every country's honestly) are choke full of propaganda. I only noticed because I got formal education from 3 different countries.

I found it very interesting for example ... that Spain does not teach about the inquisition or the spanish american war.

Flip side, in the US there's nothing in our books about any of Europe's history at all.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

US history sounds even worse than our Canadian history classes. Just complete garbage. And then you see what people are learning in other countries and you have to wonder why we act like 10-12 years isn’t enough time to fit in any reasonable amount of our, honestly, very short history.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Things are looking pretty fucking bleak, but not in a "Spanish flu in the trenches" kind of way.

The US is turning into fucked up Gilead.

Water shortages are about to be a thing.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Drove past Glen Canyon dam the other day. Everything in the area has high water due to early snow melt, and yet powell lake and glen canyon are noticeably low. Gonna be bad year for anyone downstream.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It's gonna be a bad entire foreseeable future. The laws governing how much water can be used from the Colorado River were all made during an unusual wet spell that they mistook for normal; it can't actually supply that much. Unless the politicians manage to get their shit together and reduce the allocations, levels are just going to get worse and worse and worse until there's nothing left, even if the weather isn't bad.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago

No.

IMO 2026 is the turn around year for europe/russia already and europe will slowly provide enough stability to the world to prevent WW3.

Lots of stupid wars and conflicts lay ahead though.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

Maybe. We won't really know its WW3 until we are very much in it. Terms like first world war and WW2 were used within months of each war starting, but until you know the scale it becomes you can't really be certain where it will escalate to.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think by "WW3" you are really asking, will countries start lobbing nukes at each other? Unlikely, although I wouldn't put it past Trump to try one at least once. Rumors are that he has asked the military to use nukes more than once already and they refused or talked him out of it.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just gotta convince that FEMA tRump appointee that hurricanes exist. Then tRump will try to direct its path with a Sharpee marker. When that fails, he'll suggest we nuke the hurricane. That's when we dance!

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No. This is one demented pedophile and a criminally indicted zionist radical doing pirouettes and backflips while lining their coffers.

It will further radicalise the Middle East to be sure, but everything they can do from the air is already done.

There is no plan, and bibi probably never thought he would get this far.

Trump can’t afford to keep this going whilst maintaining the rest of global security and keep persuading his other hobbies in Greenland, Venezuela, Mexico and Canada.

Also, the domestic situation inside USA and the Epstein files not going away may soon divert his attention away again. As you’ve probably seen, the dude and his circle is all about market pump and dump for all the insider trading and hit and run military operations so to make his weak ass look big bold and strong. If they were serious about Iran they wouldn’t be doing it like this.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Short of China invading Taiwan, this is probably the closest we will get. Multiple world powers fighting each other, proxy wars, etc.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

China invading Taiwan

which won't happen for so many reasons. honestly, china seems to be the thing holding the global economy together

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

No, Russia and China don't give a shit. Russia is too busy with losing to Ukraine, and China isnt happy with Iran bombing places that actually give China more oil than they do.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Iran has been stirring shit for too long for anyone with military credibility to step in on its behalf. It’ll be a regional conflict at most.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago
[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

No, this is just Iraq again, but with the victim throwing bombs at everyone close this time

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

We're already at a two front war.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No.

While the Trump admin is idiotic, the Iran conflict is just a repeat of the events in the later half of the 20th century.

Russia has exhausted itself trying to obtain some paltry mineral resources.

China is highly aggressive and will continue to expand into neighboring countries like they have already been doing, they're the most likely cause of a widespread global conflict, but judging by their incompetent handling of Venezuela, Cuba, and Iran as well as their rapidly declining population due to irresponsible governing (they executed or exiled most of the social policy experts a century ago and put a missile defense scientist in charge of the bureau that tracks population trends resulting in the One Child Policy) I doubt they will be confident about any longterm wars. Still, they constructed a mostly underground military city near beijing 10x the size of the pentagon, so they're definitely planning something.

Fact of the matter is, for all competent leadership, war is less efficient means to obtain things you want than trade. War has become too expensive in the 21st century. Only idiots wage war.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Xi understood that 10 years ago, but he's purged or fired everyone near him that would tell him that now.

The US understood that 4 years ago. But then we elected Taco for a second go round.

I'm not saying they will, I'm saying that dictators and fascist assholes don't always do that makes sense.

I forsee America entering a debt crisis and China might see that as an opportunity.

[–] DoomGuy_e66@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

From what I've gathered from the comments, I think we're safe so far

Depends. Can the galling regime in Iran motivate a Shiite revolution across the world and can they do gorilla warfare from tunnels in Iran's mountainous regions for a long time. And distrupt the flow of oil sufficiently thus causing the us dollar to collapse and thus the global markets along with it (Rothschild banks USD as international reserve currency etc etc).

The us is distracted so China might take the opportunity to take Taiwan. That will herold in the end of the consumer driven economy enjoyed by the western world cos trade with china drives everything.

When markets and quality of life collapse this bad u either get a populist revolution (eg Hitler, Stalin, etc) or the government starts an economic rejuvenation project (war driven economy).

The economy is essentially just a function of how effective a population is at turning resources into product. Wealth concentration has got so heigh we are approaching the point that people can no longer consume the GDP. Thus u need a product sink else the economy stops. Thankfully the war driven economy already proves an excellent resources sink (war itself). Orwell predicted this yet nobody listened.

We might get to be the ones to witness the death of liberty, but then again the pots boiling so slowly their is little chance we will know when that happens. Who's to say the final blow to liberty hasn't already been dealt and we just can't see it yet.

If China and Russia had come to Iran’s aid then it would be WW3.

But they didn’t so it’s just going to be dusty Vietnam. Again.

[–] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

No, WW3 won't happen until China goes for Taiwan, and even then that's just another step, dunno if that would explode into a bonafide world war.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The odds just got higher. If China goes for Taiwan, and the US goes all out to defend them, I'm willing to say thats it, WW 3.

It won't be as cinematic as the second, but that's my line.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

US would help Taiwan just as much as Russia is helping Iran.

They are tied to elswhere atm.

We all know what happens to countries trying several fronts at once.

War is about logistics, logistics and logistics. Remote wars bring more logistics in play. And they are burning munitions fast in Iran.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China doesn't need to do anything, the US could just do what they just did and attack first.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Correct, if the US goes after China, that would also be ww3.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Holy ai map, batman. What the shit is that?

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

At least New Zealand is on it I guess?

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey, maybe whoever created this map just has a really thick London accent. Although that wouldn't explain all the other mistakes.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's cheap-ass AI. Just to put a visual onto the current status. Not meant to be quality.