this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28692 readers
2777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Troops have logged more than 110 complaints about such comments with the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.

Without any clear message coming from the White House with regard to the purpose of the Iran war, U.S. military commanders have turned to Jesus, apparently telling American troops that the war is “biblically sanctioned.”

The U.S. joined Israel in striking Iran early Saturday morning. By Monday evening, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, or MRFF, was “inundated” with complaints, receiving more than 110 grievances from U.S. military personnel stationed at dozens of sites across the Middle East, reported independent journalist Jonathan Larsen.

One such note included an anecdote from a noncommissioned officer, who reported that their commander had “urged us to tell our troops that this was ‘all part of God’s divine plan’ and he specifically referenced numerous citations out of the Book of Revelation referring to Armageddon and the imminent return of Jesus Christ.”

The NCO’s complaint was lodged on behalf of 15 troops, including 11 Christians, one Muslim, and one Jew, according to Larsen. The officer stated that such remarks “destroy morale and unit cohesion and are in violation of the oaths we swore to support the [C]onstitution.”

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago

I fucking hate organized religion. I've hated it since first reading the history of its atrocities . I hate it even more now.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Congress did not delacre war, making all orders to attack Iran, illegal. Soldiers are obligated to refuse illegal orders. Yet none are. Don't put your hope in soldiers to prevent Trump admin from committing horrific war crimes, or lightning the constitution on fire and seizing power.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 36 minutes ago

Yeah but the War Powers Act gives the president 60 days of war as a special treat.

[–] DABDA@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"[The] Republicans are selling their soul to win elections. Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. The government won't work without it. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them."
-Barry Goldwater (November 1994)

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Winning an election is a means to power. They aren't selling their soul to win elections but to seize power.

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So now it's a Christian holy war. Just perfect, this will not end well for anyone.

[–] atropa@piefed.social 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Praise Jeebus

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

One such note included an anecdote from a noncommissioned officer, who reported that their commander had “urged us to tell our troops that this was ‘all part of God’s divine plan’ and he specifically referenced numerous citations out of the Book of Revelation referring to Armageddon and the imminent return of Jesus Christ.”

Anything can be "part of God's divine plan" as long as some fundamentalist asshole wants to claim it is.

Was protecting pedophiles all part of God's divine plan too, or were y'all just improvising? Guess we'll all just have to wait and hear what God says. Probably sooner than any of us were expecting thanks to these ~~mentally I'll murderous cunts~~ "righteous angels" who walk among us.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nah fuck it let's say it is God's plan. Did they miss the part where, in the battle of Armageddon, the worldly armies all belong to the Antichrist? Unless these dipshits are literally descending glorified from heaven with actual physical Jesus leading them, they are on the Antichrist's side.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they all expect to get raptured and leave the rest of us to deal with the mess they leave behind.

May be, but that's as unbiblical a belief for them to have as the one mentioned above. What they believe in isn't the Bible or Christianity, it's a pack of malicious lies designed to make them think that not only is it okay for them to kill, steal, and destroy, but that God wants them to do it as his chosen people.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

I'm starting to think this God guy isn't a very good planner.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's like Trump has to convince everyone he is the antichrist without actually saying it.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

He's convinced people to blindly follow whatever he does. MAGA is a cult.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Anecdotally, conversations with the terminally online type of leftists shows many to be still quite self-satisfied about not voting for Kamala, though.

Because, bOtHsIdEs would have started a religious war on behalf of a secular country.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

You're not wrong, and to be clear I voted for Kamala just like I begrudgingly voted for Biden in 2020, and if somebody wants to argue things would be just as fucking horrible right now with Kamala as president, I would assume they're a troll or just a contrarian not worth arguing with.

But if we're looking at this as a continuum of who is to blame if the world were to end today, I do have to say I think there are plenty of more blameworthy people than just those on the left who either fell for propaganda or refused to compromise their values, and honestly (if not naively) believed they were making the right choice.

Regardless, we can't change that now, but if the world ends this way, as of this day I honestly would have to say the establishment Democrats are continuing to edge towards more complicit than blameless, even while knowing this is their chance to prove why they deserve any votes they don't receive.

If I could do 2024 again, I would still vote for Kamala, but I have to say, it makes me more than just a little angry to see so little effort by establishment Democrats to consider their constituents before their donors.

Why Can’t Top Democrats Just Say “No War With Iran”?

It's definitely not all Democrats, and there have been some (like Wyden) who have made their opinions very clear. Those democrats deserve every vote they can get. But shit like this from Schumer only helps to undermine democracy and public faith in the democratic party. It would be great to not have to constantly question who's interests he actually has in mind.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The dem party leaders have complained about how this war was started, haven't heard much actual opposition to the war itself from them

They probably wouldn't have been so sloppy, but the messaging I heard was they would have backed up Israel unconditionally

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 3 points 3 hours ago

Which is why we need anti-zionist liberals to run against them in the primaries. Find enough of those, I'll vote for the ones I can vote for...the rest is up to the peole

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, because the US wasn't sucking Israeli cock when Biden was president. It's not guaranteed this exact situation would've played out if Harris was president, but fundamentally it's Tel Aviv setting the schedule here, not DC. It's more than likely a Harris admin would've just taken more care to manufacture consent first (and not call the affair a religious war, but secular bombs aren't any better than religious bombs).

PS: Leftists unwilling to vote blue don't exist in large enough numbers to skew any US elections.

[–] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 2 points 43 minutes ago

Leftists too lazy to register to vote exist in large numbers.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Jesus about to go full Bobby Hill with how firmly he tells this administration he doesn't know them

[–] Major_Tsiom@fedia.io 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Who could have seen the United States becoming so fucked up evil? Unbelievable!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Everyone outside the USA.

[–] acantharea@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

🫠 ugggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

Don't want me for a Sunbeam.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago