this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
223 points (99.1% liked)

politics

28607 readers
2250 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A November 2011 video has resurfaced of Donald Trump accusing then-President Barack Obama of wanting to start a war with Iran.

Trump stated in the video that Obama had "absolutely no ability to negotiate" and would initiate a war with Iran.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Trump believes in nothing but himself. There is no moral compass. There is only him. Nothing else matters.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 46 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Trump was a Democrat who golfed with Bill Clinton and endorsed Hillary for senator.

He was also a Republican who hated Obama and insisted, somehow, that Obama was not even American.

He's a very greedy chameleon, greed is his only constant; whatever he SAYS is shite, unless he's saying "give me money" of course.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump was a Democrat who golfed with Bill Clinton and endorsed Hillary for senator.

He was also a Republican who hated Obama and insisted, somehow, that Obama was not even American.

That difference is as stark as black and white....

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 9 points 6 hours ago

His racism is the one consistent thing

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

yeah. blows me away he once talked about wanting universal healthcare.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It shows that he has no ideals, no plans, no morals. He will give and say anything and everything to enrich himself.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It's all about the power, money is just power. He failed in business, couldn't hack it, so he ran for public office. Now, he's "the most powerful man in the world". That's why he did it. But, he still believes that money is the real power, and he still considers himself a failure, so he's wielding the power he has as hard as he can to compensate.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

This has been continuous policy over 40 years. The highest United States government policy is to maintain “full spectrum dominance” across the globe, militarily, financially, and socially (soft power). The latter two have waned to the extent that we are over dependent on the first.

This is a “Hail Mary”

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In the modern era, I don't understand how it's "resurfaced." No, it's not resurfaced, it was always there, it's just that for some reason people and the media finally took notice of it again. Plenty of "resurfaced" stuff matches this description: it never went anywhere, people just didn't pay attention until they suddenly do and then they'll stop paying attention again and even though it's still there people will consider it sunk.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Are you arguing about the use of “resurfaced” instead of the blatant hypocrisy?

It was buried under the tsunami of bullshit trump, the republicans, ICE, and all the rest have been generating.

Yes, “resurfaced” is correct terminology and usage in this case.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Are you arguing about the use of “resurfaced”

It's a popular media gimmick. Turn old news into a new headline because you've got nothing better to talk about.

The NYPost and WaTi play this game all the time

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The blatant hypocrisy speaks for itself. The fact that it's treated like it's some shiny new thing instead of like you said, one of many things discarded as the firehose of falsehoods kept squirting and distracting the media with shiny new things to get clicks instead of organizing it all into a well documented tapestry of hypocrisy is part of why we're here. The medias failure to contend with the nature of the beast is a problem. Treating every single incident as though it's a unique, stand-alone issue instead of weaving it together as part of a larger whole is a problem.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

resurfaced

shiny new thing

It's can't be new: the 're' is right in the name!

[–] doesit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

So?! Gonna fight this guy with statements they made in the past?! It's like arguing with IDF that what they're doing is unfair and immoral.
They and their voters don't care. It's the kind of people that simply wants to have the winning hand, whatever way. Integrity, honesty, fair play, ... are not in their dictionary. Power & money are their values. These guys are only busy with their own interests. And the goal justifies the means.
At first they'll try to get their way legally (eg. soft approach à la Cambridge Analytica and advantageous algorithms, FOX news, ...). If that doesn't work they'll adapt the law (ID & birth certificate, Roe vs Wade, Climate agreements, ...). If that doesn't work they'll go "slightly" outside the law but it's for the best (ICE razzia's, deporting illegal mexicans to maximum security prisons in Venezuela, shooting supposedly drug boats in the Caribbean, ...), If that doesn't work they'll go full Nazi (ICE are militia in the streets, kill political opponents like they tried on J6, track every not like-minded citizen with Palantir, DOGE data & whatever data they scraped, for instance, in this thread and put them in the concentration camps that are being built across America, ...)
My point is either way, power will not be given back.
EDIT : layout. Went a bit off topic perhaps.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Always projection with this slime.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Speaking of which, where is his birth certificate?

[–] YoiksAndAway@piefed.zip 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Makes me wonder how many Republicans are afraid of Russian kompromat. Or, they could just be complete hypocrites. Not really a middle ground, there.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

#agedLikeMilk