this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
144 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6061 readers
2403 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

They will just do IPO and get trillion dollar valuation, and poof, they are profitable.

Ad-apalypse is coming, they will squeeze all the pennies from your data and prompts. Personalized ad response to prompt.

If you have no soul, get ready to buy malware ads to bad JS libraries suggested by AI, filled with crypto miners and crypto stealers

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 hours ago

Remember kids, this is capital being offered to create a monopoly (in the sense of creating a non-free market/environment with users mostly not having a choice/being forced to use AI), not for innovation or some intrinsic added value.

[–] dismay3915@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I dont understand anything from this. Can someone explain?

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cashburn is like projecting profit but instead of profit you are just going to burn the pool of money you have so much your profits won't mean anything. Anything black on this line is profit, red is cash burn. All companies start in a cash burn state, but if you look at the ones listed, the initial cash burn when they launched was relatively small.

OpenAI is planning to burn more money than most of them profited.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

9.3 billion isn't small. 218 billion is just stupid.

[–] dimjim@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago

I could be completely wrong here, but it looks like the chart is comparing companies that go into debt to get started, and then make back that profit once their service/product is out there. OpenAI presumably has made zero profit yet, so they've only accomplished going $218B in debt.

[–] Renat@szmer.info 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sam Altman will became the poorest man in the world with 218B debt.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh sweet summer child, he will have no personal debt on failure, only personal profit on success.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

🎵 It's the maaagic of capitalism! 🎶

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

"If we can just make an AI that can overthrow humanity it won't matter how much cash we burn!"

Anyone else have this unsettling feeling we are in the hibernation period of "If Anyone Builds it, Everyone Dies"? The post containment breach but pre openly operating phase. Is there some force pushing more resources towards AI than is rational? Is this bubble human greed and stupidity, or is there something else at play?

[–] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

I thought about it for a while and decided, nah. It's easy to dismiss offhand that these people are just stupid, but if you think about it a bit longer, these people aren't just stupid, they are really, really, really, stupid. The model architecture is bad, the data is poisoned, improvement is O(data^2), and performance gains stalled in 2024. No AGI in sight or even a viable method of getting there.

They looked at these charts and thought, the others spent a lot of money, then made a lot of money. If we spend a LOT of money, we'll make EVEN MORE!

Why don't we put up the WeWork or MoviePass charts hmmm?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago

But the bigger the burn the bigger the profits, right? RIGHT?

[–] braydan@sh.itjust.works 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago

It may be ugly but it isn't too confusing