this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

838 readers
406 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

a jacobin glow up moment fedposting

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A Socialist who is more worried about keeping the borders of his nation sacrosanct than anything else

I wonder what you would call such a Nationalist Socialist soviet-hmm

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

European chauvinist Socdem (regardless of the reformist or classical sense) into European fascist is quite the pipeline.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering they blew up Nordstream, it may be the main pipeline now

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you, I'll be here forever

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hit the image posting limit

But yes

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There's a limit to how many images you're allowed to post?

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a certain time period, yes

I've hit it ~~so goddamn much, stop stifling me!~~ a couple of times

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Simpsons images cause the 502 bad gateways alex-oopsie

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

dprk-soldier, but it's Homer being attacked by cleaning product mascots

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if all images of simpsons are hosted on the same server, wouldn't it be possible to reconstruct the series and thus akin to piracy curious-sickle

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Only if we applied the original audio

But, if we were to have our own audio tracks...

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
"local_site_rate_limit": {
  "local_site_id": 1,
  "message": 180,
  "message_per_second": 60,
  "post": 6,
  "post_per_second": 600,
  "register": 4,
  "register_per_second": 3600,
  "image": 6,
  "image_per_second": 3600,
  "comment": 12,
  "comment_per_second": 300,
  "search": 60,
  "search_per_second": 600,
  "published": "2023-06-17T20:29:44.499734Z",
  "import_user_settings": 1,
  "import_user_settings_per_second": 86400
},

https://hexbear.net/api/v3/site

In plain english that is 6 images within an hour of the first


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

You gotta pump those numbers up

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Death to Jacobin, of course

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what's most astonishing (aside from the fact that this could be printed in new york crimes without any changes), what is exactly socialist about this guy, where is any evidence of socialism? cooperation with norwegian socdems? waow, thank jacobin.

its like breathless coverage of aocia talking to fucking spd, so socialist much worker foreign policy

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

he's european that's a kind of socialist

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ridiculous to still be pro european army intervention, pro regime change in russia, pro military spending. wtf

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There could be many conclusions. I’ll just say what concerns me most. Over the past year, the reactionary US president has done what the “antiwar” left has been calling for. What has this led to? Increased aggression, more civilian casualties, and more destruction. Things have only gotten worse. In this situation, I think the “antiwar” folks should have done some rethinking. But I still don’t see them doing that.

The logic of many “antiwar” leftists seems to be, “We provoked this war, so now let’s throw the victim of aggression under the bus.” In Trump’s version, it’s “Let’s throw the victims under the bus and rob them.” Despite the humanistic rhetoric, all proposals in practice boiled down to leaving Ukraine defenseless in the face of imperialist aggression. It should be obvious by now that this is the wrong approach. In the 1990s, the US forced Ukraine to give up its nuclear weapons to Russia, making us vulnerable. The US’s responsibility now is to help Ukraine, not to reward the aggressor.

this passes for leftist analysis in the jacobin btw.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

Hey, guys, seriously, seriously guys, this war is the one good war, hey, hey, guys, hey, hey, guys, guys, guys, hey, hey, seriously, guys, seriously, seriously, seriously guys, seriously this is the one, seriously , seriously, guys, hey.

Ukraine

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Over the past year, the reactionary US president has done what the “antiwar” left has been calling for.

This is such obvious bad faith horseshit that I'm surprised even Jacobin (where the bar is on the floor) allows it to pass. The idea that the Trump US position of a Ukraine & Russia shakedown while still treating Russia as an enemy state is remotely the same as any pronicpaled anti-war leftist would suggest is just absurd.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah that was a certified bruh moment if I've ever seen one

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Are they still platforming him? He fucking was doing the rounds like 2 years ago across all the Canadian "left" magazines too.

He's basically a part of some left-lib DSA-but-for-Ukraine and lied when he said Zelensky didn't ban all of the leftist parties from government because they didn't ban his even though it's just some small group that doesn't do anything election-wise.

edit: it was 4 years ago.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He was bragging about how international it was because it had a welder from Poland in it.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Fucking hell, that makes the queue in my local sandwich shop look like the International Socialist Congress even though I live in Gammon-on-River.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

they have like 3 rotating voices of the compatible left, one being "we are smollbean can't condemn entity behavior", one is this guy of "unlimited genocide on the russian orcs" and one "oh well, if nazis are fighting that's okay, russia is bigger nazi". nevermind worker rights or ownership stakes or oligarchs or technological dystopia, no, those are for russian trolls apparently. because talking to english speaking ngo worker in ukraine is self-evidential truth

[–] Lemmyglad@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

Jacoffbin strikes again.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

Let me guess, he's a "Socialist" of the "National" variety?

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Taras Bilous

Don't they have literally anyone else? Literally every time I see an article of the type "See, the Ukrainian Left supports the war" it is him.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i was slightly unfair in another comment, they did print that ishchenko (ishenko?) social science guy with much more nuanced take on the ukraine internal cleavages (re:russian/prole ukrainian/tech worker associations and older/younger people) and stuff, i dunno why they don't have a modicum of editorial tone, pick a lane

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Volodymyr Ishchenko? I remember him as generally having a pretty good take, but avoiding the most sensitive issues.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yes. why everyone is named volodymyr, smh. i think he has a fine depressive sociologist take. i legit can't parse leftist people not seeing giant nazi shaped hole around which ukrainian nationalism is rotating (the azov guy is polling at 40% approval ffs), it's fine to doubt russian motives around it, i doubt them too, it's not fine, however, to deny it or obfuscate it for nominal leftist publication, it's like taking mussolini at his words about smashing the capitalist state, supreme unseriousness

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Volodymyr/Vladimir is literally the same name in Ukrainian and Russian pronunciation. And it is one of the most popular names too.