this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
161 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

14391 readers
640 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Honestly I never even heard of this game.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

amazon marketing basically put all their advertising budget by making mr beast create an event themed around it, and most people didnt get the memo that it was an actual game.

if you dont watch him, or know someone who watches him, you basically would have never known. similar to how most pc players werent aware of concord at launch because its only advertisment was if you happen to watch state of play, a sony event.

[–] doug@lemmy.today 48 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I’m a millennial and had never heard of or seen Mr. Beast until he had that controversy around the same time he started launching shitty foods, which was enough for me to be like “don’t care for anything this guy’s involved with moving forward.” and have since then not even seen ads for anything he does except maybe once? before a Fallout episode.

They must have their targeted advertising on lock ‘cause I guess they got the message from my lack of interest that I’m not in his demographic and aren’t advertising to me.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Millennial also, very glad not to have Mr. Beast advertised to me. I had one glance at that mf and I knew he's just doing it for the money. Phony ahh bish.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't that what all YouTube sponsorships are? Doing it for the money.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Well yeah, sponsorships. But all his videos are for the money. Only. And all the controversy around him doesn't sit well with me. I watched his former employees say some pretty damning things. And showed some pretty damning footage.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Claims to be a millennial then uses "ahh" like a 14 year old girl on ticktock. Something here is fishy.

I denounce your claim of millennial status. No self respecting depressed millennial would be caught dead using Gen z brain rot algospeak

[–] yamper@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

no depressed millennial has any self respect to begin with

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

Can't afford to rent any self respect

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

But our irony is on fleek

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We millennials have been relegated to the kids table so long we're fluent in Gen z slang

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I use it ironically.

I assure you I was blowing into my NES and N64 cartridges like every other millennial.

I'm not depressed though. Doing very well. I'm not American, so maybe that helps my chances in life.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The first and last video of his I saw was this one: “You’ve seen the dystopian horror Squid Games where a crazy rich man uses his money to put a bunch of poor rubes through a series of deadly games for the amusement of spectators? Well now I, a crazy rich man, have used my money to put a bunch of poor rubes through a series of ~~deadly~~ games for the amusement of spectators! I couldn’t do the deadly bit because the laws don’t let me yet. No, I couldn’t say what the lesson from the show was. Probably ‘wouldn’t it be cool’.”

He’s got those dead eyes.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

mr beast was so cringey when he did that cringey "al qaeda in a cave like skit commercial" with him and other influencers being forced to eat his poisonous food.

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

That makes a lot of sense.

I don't watch mr beast or know anyone who does and I've never heard of this game until now.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Wait you are telling me that the very generation of kiddos who find Mr Beast amusing and enjoy spending their free time watching others play video games didnt end up playing the video game that was heavily marketed towards them?

I'm sure Amazon will be giving the pink slip to a few people and they've really earned it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

plus people are getting turned off by mr beast and his content/ behaviour too. and the cringey DIY commercial he did with lunchly.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I've seen double digit posts about it closing, which is super weird on Lemmy.

Before that is never heard of it either

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, not until today did I hear about this thing.

Not that it would have mattered really.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Comments on youtube trailer for this game show that 2 months ago people knew it flopped. Also, apparently they had MrBeast help promote this game.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem with capitalism is that rich morons can dictate all the resources onto a game with completely unreasonable expectations, and when it inevitably blows up in their face they'll ruin the lives of the hundreds of people who worked on the game by firing them. And these people's families will fall into chaos through no fault of their own.

[–] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

To be fair, they lay everyone off even when the teams make a good game too.

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stalin would like to disagree, you don't need capitalism for that.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 14 points 1 month ago

What video games did Stalin lead development on?

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Making a game and projecting monthly users like that seems rooted in something other than passion for creating good games anyway. Glad to never know you.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Projecting the number of users is a big part of planning for online games to ensure they have infrastructure. Helldivers 2 for example ended up with a playerbase about 4x their expectations when they initially released which is why they ran into server load issues.

A concurrent player count high of only 320 for an estimated 100k active users per month is absolutely hilarious though.

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 4 points 1 month ago

Fair point. It just comes off as greed-driven imo

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

'Member when online games let people host their own servers?

I 'member.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Right? I think this is the answer to why people don't get invested in a game like this. The publisher asks customers for money upfront, then continues to ask through in game purchases, forcing a connection to them whenever you use it all the while holding a button that can cut off access to everything you paid them for. The rational response is to refuse this skewed bargain, and play something better.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 31 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't really trust Amazon to run anything on my PC with internet access, let alone pay them for a game.

[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago

King of Meat is the game.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 21 points 1 month ago

"this co-op party game": King of Meat

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not that I would outright refuse a live service game, yet, but this sort of thing being a possibility is why I would see it as quite a large red flag when thinking of getting a game.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

"We've made a bang-average live service game that both costs money upfront and has 'monetisation' features built in. In addition, it's in a somewhat niche hard-to-describe genre, has a nondescript name, and we pissed our advertising budget up the wall."

Nice one, AWS. 100K players, easily.

Like you say, if you're paying money upfront, you want it forever. From the initial "four player dungeon crawler" description, I thought they'd remade Gauntlet or something - I might be up for that, if it was made with love. Instead, they appear to have made an online collection of bonus levels from Spyro, with corporate-approved zaniness and 'tude that's always asking you for your credit card details, and that they can shut down whenever they like. How about no?

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Looks like gaming is dead. /s