this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

6249 readers
171 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Taliban has quietly enacted a new penal code that allows husbands to physically punish their wives and children as long as it doesn’t cause broken bones or open wounds.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.jurist.org/news/2026/02/taliban-new-penal-code-legalizes-domestic-violence-against-women/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

that allows husbands to physically punish their wives and children as long as it doesn’t cause broken bones or open wounds.

Sure, as if broken bones or open wounds would motivate an abused helpless victim to go against it or take legal actions. Which they aren't allowed either.

I so hope religions with their hells are right, so these dimwitted pathetic slavers will rot there in all eternity. But...

You know, I respect people who use their religion as an impetus to make the world a better place. The civil rights fighters and humanitarian groups that are like, "Hey, our religion tells us that suffering is something we can prevent and alleviate, so we do it." I like those religious people.

These are NOT those religious people. Therefore, fuck this interpretation of Islam a thousand ways, this is the 21st god damn century.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

America: heavy breathing

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I found it ironic when most screamed that "We shouldn't have been there in the first place!" and "Finally the injustice is ending!" when the US withdrew. It was very clear to me from the start that for a majority of the afghan people, life would get significantly worse under the Taliban. Was the invasion a sham? Yes. Did a lot of innocent people get killed? Also yes. But the invasion brought a significant liberation for women especially.

Disagreed. Modern talibans are a direct reaction to the invasion. Extremist ideologies tends to be more resilient against invasions, and after the invadors leave, that extremism turns inwards.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was very clear to me from the start that for a majority of the afghan people, life would get significantly worse under the Taliban.

Except one of the reasons the Taliban took over the country as fast as they did is that the US backed government didn't even nominally control the majority of Afghanistan. The US-backed government was a rotten corrupt cesspool that gave its subjects marginally more civil rights at the cost of plunging the country into decades of civil/"civil" war and destroying any chance at development and progress due to its rampant corruption and incompetence. They did a couple of things right (though very half assed), but it's downright comical to talk about "liberation" when two thirds of the population were illiterate. Not to say the Taliban are any better at these things, but at least the Taliban don't have the world's strongest military backing them.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They had education, sports and more rights for girls and now they don't.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 days ago

"Yeah we bombed the shit out of them for 50 years, but we gave them soccer!"

Your bombs will never be liberating.

[–] Farvana@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 days ago

They also enslaved and raped little boys.

In fact, part of the extreme fundamentalism is as a reaction to the US propping up people who were into bacha bazi.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hate the usa and their imperialism, but I do hate religions, and especially this "religion of peace" much more. So I'd agree. It was for the wrong reasons, but sure a dead Taliban is a good Taliban. These child fucking slavers need to be eradicated.

It's 2026 goddammit and those pathetic losers still see women as an absolute property. One chromosome decides your fate...incredible. Let's not even mention anything queer-ish.

[–] doleo@lemmy.one -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It’s 2026 goddammit and those pathetic losers still see women as an absolute property. One chromosome decides your fate…incredible. Let’s not even mention anything queer-ish.

And who is going to invade the USA for the same, above, reasons?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I hate the USA but last time I checked, women were not property by law and also are allowed to get educated. But if you see no difference, fine. You're surely free to have an opinion.

[–] doleo@lemmy.one -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No? How's it going over there regarding reproductive rights?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Dude. Just because they're also full of religious backwards numbnuts, who want to reign over women, doesn't mean they're even close to the Taliban level of degeneracy.

The USA might be going backwards in time to 1950 and before, but the pedoliban are still in the year 700.