this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
52 points (98.1% liked)

News

36000 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 18 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Absolute dumbass. Truly a self-own for the ages.

Play stupid games, ...

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 hour ago

Collect insurance?

[–] SourDrink@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I half thought this was archive.org they were blacklisting. Two whole different sites.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Dammit. Everyone's been using that site to get around paywalls because it works well. Now I have to go find another one that works as well. :|

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There are others that don't DDoS blogs.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Well, yes, I'll be off looking for them next time I need to use an archival site. I'm bummed to learn this crap about archive.ph.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It works well because they use paid accounts to scrape a bunch of paywalled sites, which is why publishers are trying to figure out who runs it.

It's completely untrustworthy now that they've shown that they can (and do) edit archived pages.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Here's the relevant archive.today guidance page on Wikipedia for anyone curious:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance

If you have a Wikipedia account, you can help replace these links!
Go to the How you can help section, then click on the search links for any of the given domains, and you can go and manually re-archive any links with Archive.org, Ghostarchive, or Megalodon.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Arguably the biggest problem with Wikipedia as it aged is the accumulation of dead links.

Brilliant move.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

I used to find dead links annoying until I realized that many dead links are also saved in the wayback machine. This comment isn't only about Wikipedia.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Why do you need an archive of Wikipedia though? Each page retains its entire history, so you can easily go back to old versions without using a third-party site (especially one that DDoSes people)

Wikimedia also provide downloads of the whole of Wikipedia, including page history. You can easily have your own copy of the entirety of Wikipedia if you want to, as long as you've got enough disk space and patience to download it.

Edit: I'm an idiot but I'm leaving this comment here. I didn't realise you meant dead links on Wikipedia, not to Wikipedia.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Wikipedia was using archive.today to link to off-wiki articles such as news articles, where the links had stopped working. Similar to how it also uses the archive.org Wayback machine for the same purpose.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 hour ago

I understand now. I completely missed the point.