this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
26 points (67.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

40656 readers
1034 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You know I really doubt this.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, i'd say it was only true "at one time, for some people." e.g the upper class in 1800s britain and america.


I think the historical norm can be derived as follows:

Long ago, say medieval times, people probably took off their clothes more often and nudity was more common. People bathed in rivers in public in those days, they needed to work in water sometimes (hence would show knees from hoisting up clothes) and probably chose to take their thick clothes off during sunny harvest days.

Historic accounts actually say that women would go shirtless, i.e boobs literally out, to relieve from heat during outdoor labour - this was the case in some parts of japan in the very early 1900s and some parts of Britain in 1800s. In Japan towns women went fishing together, in britain it would have been farming groups if i remember correctly.

The exception to this historical reality is localised to industrial-era elite, who preferred to button up tightly and show absolutely no skin (except for face). I suppose it might also be the case for men living in countries where burqas and headscarves are the norm for women, but those countries are still the same way today.

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

men and females

🙄🙄🙄

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

~~men & women~~
~~males & females~~
men & females

It does feel kinda weird, right?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk what this comment means but yeah, that’s the point of the original comment. Neckbeards who call women “females” are weird

[–] orphigle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's wrong with calling men males and women females?

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Literally nothing. If anyone thinks using the terms male and female together is wrong then they are an idiot.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Read this whole thread. No one in this thread is saying man and female is normal. They are saying male and female is.

Can you articulate what’s wrong with using the terms male and female? Or are you more of a braindead, one word comment kind of guy?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Really? You read the whole thread?

Talk about brain dead lol. Maybe you’re missing the tip level comment?

Excited to find out what super generic insult you have lined up as a comeback to this once you see that comment :)

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Please point out what comment contradicts what I said. I’ll wait.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

https://piefed.blahaj.zone/comment/3437757

I assume you’re trolling at this point if you’re pretending that you can’t scroll up in a thread lol.

Also, dude… “I’ll wait”?

Please try tactics that aren’t out of the Kindergarten version of “how to be an asshole online”

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It objectifies women

You could say men and women or you could say male and female. Just don't mix them together.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It objectifies women

By what logic?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

That's not a helpful answer.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago

At one time, a man seeing a female fully naked was the equivalent of a man seeing a female today too... because, you know, everyone was fully naked all the time, clothes hadn't been invented yet...

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 18 points 1 day ago
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The knees? Are you high? The ankles.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not even that. It's a myth. Most skirts were short enough to show the ankles because nobody wanted a muddy skirt.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 3 points 23 hours ago

I appreciate your well actually here. I would just like to point out for future reference that any comment containing the question "are you high?" like that is most likely tongue in cheek.

I was just about to say, lol
Them spicy ankle pics

[–] elvith@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

The ankles? Looks nervously in the rough direction of the middle east You mean her face?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Some countries still don't allow women to show their faces because its "indecent exposure" morality laws or whatever 🤦‍♂️

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, we all know that women are just...completely covered in skin, right? They've got it all over them.

[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got an even bigger secret: Men are too

In men it's the third layer down under hair and grease.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 3 points 23 hours ago

You know what's crazy? So are intersex people!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, because people are wired to like boobs.

Not just people, mammals in general

If you don't like boobs, you might starve to death as a baby. So loving boobs is probably one of the most selected for traits for any mammal.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I lived in Haiti for three years. Breasts weren't considered private. After 2 months, I didn't even notice them. Interestingly, once I came back to Canada, they reverted back to being sexualized.

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting !

Reminds me of the Islamic concept of the Aura, which basically denotes body parts that should be covered in public. There's the so-called greater and the so-called lesser Aura. The greater Aura (= the body parts for which you commit a greater sin should you uncover yours in public or look at someone else's), goes from the navel to the knees. Thus, for a Muslim woman, it is less of a sin to go topless (as long as her pants cover all the way up to the navel) as it is to run around in a miniskirt or shorts.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Interesting. It would sure attract the tourists.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Related: I wonder if "Daddy" is sexualized in places like say Singapore or Hong Kong...

I see "Daddy" used in TVB Shows... 👀

@NorthWestWind@lemmy.world So I hereby summon thee, our resident Hong Konger; is there like a sexualization of "Daddy" like there is in western countries?

Or do y'all just use the Cantonese word?

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Daddy is used normally here. I can't think of a Cantonese equivalent off my head right now, but we have plenty of phrases describing different relationships types.

For example, 食軟飯 (eat soft rice) means a man being financially dependent on a woman.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And seeing her breast was like seeing an MRI.