this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
326 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29221 readers
1963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

His Bored of Peace that he's asking $5 billion for a seat that goes straight to his Qatari bank account.

Ya'll Americans getting fucked and no one has the guns to do anything about it.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good thing he doesn't have a peanut farm.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Could you imagime the scandal?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is one other source of money Trump could potentially dip into. The president previously sold permanent seats on his board for $1 billion a head, but refused to say where that money was going.

WTF. This almost seems more important.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It would be if he wasn't taking $10B of US tax payer money for his secret Qatari slush account.

If ya'll ever get out from under this fascist government, you should demand all the money hidden away in Qatar and if it's not, well that's what aircraft carriers are for.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Was that money appropriated by Congress?

If not, he has no authority to take it.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Like Congress cares. They'll do fuck all about it.

I'm hungry. When do we eat?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

I'm sure there's a judge somewhere who said the same thing, and trump continues to not give a fuck.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

The real question is there a mechanism to access funds not appropriated?

[–] elvith@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Was it an official act, though?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is what I was wondering myself. The EU sent a representative, much to the dismay of Macron. Does that mean they paid billions for the privilege of being there? That'd be a scandal in my eyes.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, the payment was to get permanent seat. Otherwise they have membership for 3 years.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Ah ok, thank you.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sooo, anyone else not feel like paying taxes this year?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a lot of talk around this on a few different platforms, if enough people actually do so there’s potential for real and significant effect. I honestly don’t even know what the reaction from the admin would be. There simply are not enough IRS agents to police an and process a tax protest. I guess they could throw everyone that doesnt pay in the death camps they are building but that seems shortsighted

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Project 2025 was bandying about something about a "sustainable population" of the US being 150 million people max, so it sounds like they want an excuse to kill about 250 million of us.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or is it going straight to Trump’s pocket via some offshore bank account based in Qatar? We may never know.

I was looking for evidence of this, but can't find it yet so I can't argue with magas that it's what is happening.

For the seized Venezuelan oil assets though, that apparently is going directly to his account in Qatar so it really isn't a stretch to believe this board of ~~scam~~ peace money is too... I just wish we had proof so I could use it in an argument.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I just wish we had proof so I could use it in an argument.

Stop trying to take the moral high ground and just argue in their style, without facts and pure accusations.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Don't know why the down votes, that's exactly what trumpers do

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because of they go and "verify" what I say and it's found to be wrong that just cements in their mind that "we" just lie and have no idea what we're talking about. It makes any future arguments even harder because it reinforces the idea in their minds that "we're" always wrong.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many of us have the guns to do something about it (please don't change your post text, lol) but do not want to unlawfully use those guns as we may be incarcerated for making that choice.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have my guns to protect against tyranny, but it's illegal to stand against tyranny. Maybe we should petition the courts for a revolution.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So what's the point of 2A if you won't use your guns against tyranny cause it's illegal?

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

"Trump reveals he can do whatever he wants and 45% of americans will think he's super smart while the other 55% wont care."

[–] desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So there was this book that was published a few years ago and the first 3 pages were devoted to the life of a squirrel...I had to trip acid to realize the book was intended to start like that. Before you can comment on today's sociey, you must read 'The Illumantis Trilogy'. If you don't, it isn't funny...

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Illuminatus. You mean the Illuminatus Trilogy, by Shea and Wilson, and by "a few years", you mean 51.

This is Illumantis:

I sometimes think about how the attacks on the WTC were a distraction from those on the Pentagon and what they were trying to free and how today's world seems to have started that day.

Thank you for the correction, it has been 27 years, the memory has swiss-cheesed.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

First order of business should be dismantling bullshit like this.

[–] 3jane@piefed.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Did none of these members pay for a permanent membership so far?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

But we saved G.. Oh never mind. Proud now, sitouts?