I don't get the hate in the comments. I would also remove Palestine from my house. I don't want to be bombed indiscriminately by Israel.
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
362 points (98.7% liked)
Archaeology
4750 readers
5 users here now
Welcome to c/Archaeology @ Mander.xyz!
Shovelbums welcome. 🗿
Notice Board
This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.
- 2023-06-15: We are collecting resources for the sidebar!
- 2023-06-13: We are looking for mods. Send a dm to @fossilesque@mander.xyz if interested!
About
Archaeology or archeology[a] is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.
Archaeology has various goals, which range from understanding culture history to reconstructing past lifeways to documenting and explaining changes in human societies through time.
The discipline involves surveying, excavation, and eventually analysis of data collected, to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. Read more...
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- No pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology.
Links
Archaeology 101:
Get Involved:
University and Field Work:
- Archaeological Fieldwork Opportunities Bulletin
- University Archaeology (UK)
- Black Trowel Collective Microgrants for Students
Jobs and Career:
Professional Organisations:
- Chartered Institute for Archaeologists (UK)
- BAJR (UK)
- Association for Environmental Archaeology
- Archaeology Scotland
- Historic England
FOSS Tools:
- Diamond Open Access in Archaeology
- Tools for Quantitative Archaeology – in R
- Open Archaeo: A list of open source archaeological tools and software.
- The Open Digital Archaeology Textbook
Datasets:
Fun:
Other Resources:
Similar Communities
Sister Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
Plants & Gardening
Physical Sciences
Humanities and Social Sciences
Memes
Find us on Reddit
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That’s pretty heartless and evil when you consider the fact that a powerful Israeli activist group is forcing the change while the people of Palestine are being systematically slaughtered and erased.
Britain: fast regressing to the XIX century white colonialist mindset which, lets be honest, the never quite fully left
Not that Europe's Posh Fascist nation was ever as culturally, socially and politically evolved as at least Western Europe, much less Northern Europe and Scandinavia.
Certainly, having lived for around a decade each, first in The Netherlands and after in Britain, I always felt Britain was decades behind The Netherlands in terms of how they looked at and treated people.
The most classist nation in Europe only every paid lip service to the idea that inherently all people are equal and equally deserving.
the group claimed: “Applying a single name – Palestine – retrospectively to the entire region, across thousands of years, erases historical changes and creates a false impression of continuity.
It is understood that the “Palestinian descent” has been changed to read “Canaanite descent” in the Hyksos panel.
What they did is technically correct, Canaanite is the correct term for the time period. The term Palestinian did not yet exist.
BUT it is certainly no coincidence that "UK Lawyers of Israel" did request that change now.
It's just Canaanites hating Canaanites hating Canaanites.
Thanks God! 😂
'Levantine' would have been a more accurate term. The 'Canaanite' term is specifically what's used to differentiate from 'Hebrews' in zionism, both before and after Israel was created. Biblically Canaanites are Phoenecians, which are one of many Levantine tribes and city states of the Bronze and Biblical eras.
AFAIK it is common practice to call them Canaanites:
Thus, while "Phoenician" and "Canaanite" refer to the same culture, archaeologists and historians commonly refer to the Bronce Age pre-1200 BC Levantine peoples as Canaanites, while their Iron Age descendants, particularly those living on the coast, are referred to as Phoenicians.
Not disputing that, but even in that section of explanatory text it uses 'Levantine peoples'.
Well Levantine is the broader term, so you need it to define the more specific term Canaanite.
It's a broader term that is no less accurate. But it is also one more removed from political connotations since this is not just about using the term 'Canaanite' as it is also changing it from 'Palestinian.'
Changing 'Palestinian' to 'Canaanite' in 2026 specifically means something more given the Israelite-Canaanite context.
It's either malicious or stupid, and evidence is tending to the former for the group that sought the change and the latter for the museum.
Didn't the Bible also say that they were literal giants?
Some say what they were so large you could crawl into their anuses and use them as a type of motorcade. Giddy up.
Also that people can be resurrected, that matter can be duplicated and all sorts of other bullshit
They had food replicators and teleporters back then? Things have really gone downhill.
Cultural descendants of Palestinians did exist in Canaan at the time around 1200BC. I doubt that anywhere in that museum you would be able to find information about this though. Because the whole point of this debacle is a childish claim of the form "Our descendants was there first!". If British Museum had any balls they would make this correction and add the history of Philistines next to it but we all know they wouldn't do it and why.
The text changed in the museum refers to the origins of a specific line of Egyptian kings around 1650 BC. I think neither the history of the Philistines nor the history of the kingdom of Israel is relevant to this.
As to the question if they have the history of Palestine/Israel/Canaan/Levant somewhere else in the museum? I don't know, but I would hope so. If not, they would have a serious knowledge gap there. That topic deserves its own space, not a footnote in the Egyptian section.
what time period exactly? because Palestine is mentioned during the bronze age collapse. it's pretty old.
although they refer to a specific group of people that settled a specific area.
Apparently the panel in the museum is about the Hyksos, so 1650 - 1550 BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyksos
The oldest mention of the predecessor term "Peleset" is from 1150 BC. And the actual term "Palestine" appeared around the 5th century BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_name_Palestine
that would make sense then, given that at the time the Palestinians (Peleset) weren't even in the area, as they likely came from Cyprus with the Sea people.
similarly, Jews weren't there either, as they come from Babilonia. so cnaan makes sense.
that being said, there's much Palestinian erasure it makes sense to be hyper vigilant
Well, ofcourse they would do that. A genocide is not complete if you also don't erase a culture from history and collective memory, just killing them and forced migration is not enough. And I assume British museum has a lot of Zionist sponsors which is why they were so quick to agree on this. This is also another proof as to why "billionaire charities" are just tax evading methods to use insane amounts of money for attaching strings and their philanthropy is just pure bullshit.
ethnic cleansing.
The changes have been made following audience research, and after concerns were raised by UK Lawyers for Israel, a voluntary association of lawyers.
It sounds like the exhibits' text was politicized by this group.
The name "Palestine" for the region has been in use for over 1000 years.
The historian Herodotus is believed to have made the first textual mention of Palestine in the fifth century BC.
If a group of lawyers told me I can't talk about people from a region they don't like I'd laugh and ask if they want to lose their licenses to practice law
The name “Palestine” for the region has been in use for over 1000 years.
But from this article this is relating to:
Information boards in the museum’s ancient Middle East galleries, covering the period from 1500BC to 1700BC.
The change doesn't seem unreasonable to me. It wouldn't make sense to refer to Ancient Rome as "Italy" or Ancient Persia as "Iran" either.
Not when you consider the fact stated above that an powerful Israeli activist group is forcing the change while the people of Palestine are being systematically slaughtered and erased
The "powerful Israeli group" made a complaint according to the article, they didn't "force" anything. And apparently it was a valid complaint.
It doesn't seem ethical for a museum to reject valid complaints from certain people because you don't like the government of the country they're from.
That does make the changes sound reasonable. Good point!
What about saying "present day Palestine" or "present day Iran"? That helps people understand relative to what locations are called today.
Was it because of some Israeli bullshit group?
It was because of some Israeli bullshit group.
The British Museum needs a proper relootig, honestly.
As if British archeology needed to be shittier.
Ahem Elgin Marbles.
Erasing an entire culture and people. Those who are responsible could give adolf hitler advice on genocide. I wonder who it could be? Surly someone whose people have never been subject to an attempt at the same.
Literally antisemitism if you're acknolwedging the major players of Semitic languages, culture, and history.
Kind of the purpose of a museum; no?