this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
455 points (98.3% liked)

Open Source

44431 readers
286 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I stumbled across this link in the comment of another post, and thought it was super promising!

Someone mentioned something about in the US, this would be illegal due to DRM laws - not sure about the specifics of this, but regardless an open source printer seems like something we've needed for ages, as printers are something that always seem like way more of a headache then they need to be. It seems like such a simple technology that has existed for quite some time, but they are always such a pain to deal with. (Maybe it's just my bad luck with printers?)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing we are missing is a scanner. Now if only we had a FOSH-Scanner (FOSH = Free & Open-Source Hardware)

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 18 hours ago

Just what I was going to say. Yup.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago

pretty stupid that we need shit like this in the first place, but thank foss this exists.

[–] GaumBeist@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

>inkjet

LED printers have been around for fucking ever, and the average person doesn't need the graphic fidelity that only an overpriced pigment soup, which goes bad in a month, can supply.

Oh, and literally every part of a toner-based printer is easier to replace/repair... so why would a printer designed around repairability and upgradability use ink???

Edit' And I almost forgot: toner is cheaper per page than ink! Whyyy???????

[–] einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

because it makes it way more easy to build such a "open source" printer, the print head with all its mems chips structures is already on the ink cardrige, meaning hardware wise this thing is just a 2 stepper motors, one for x and y axis.

laser/led printers would be in fact the superior printer, but it would also be way more complex hardware wise.

[–] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

This. Based on my (elementary) understanding of laser printers, you have to have a laser zap a transfer belt to charge it so that it will elecromagnetically attract the toner, then precisely lay down a fine layer of toner onto the belt, then lay the microplastics + iron filings from the belt onto the page, repeat this four times, then roll the page through a tiny oven to bake on the thin, shiny layer of plastic. It's very complicated, and have you seen the price of new fuser units or transfer belts?

I had a brother laser printer with a pre-heating roll that went bad. Sourcing a replacement for that was pretty annoying. But I get your point.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

They're taking an HP printer head and customizing only the motors and controls. This is a lot easier but also a lot more reliant on HP

[–] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

I mean, toner is also made out of microplastic and iron filings.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Coming soon" for months now, I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You don't use "soon" in geologic time?

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's actually a measure of distance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

CC BY-NC-SA

Not open printer. Not open source. You will only be able to get replacements from them, worse than some other printer companies...

[–] Feddinat0r@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wont work worse as any other printer

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It’s not like the bar is anywhere but on the floor though

[–] GotExx@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not use USB-C for power?

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

USB C is awesome for the electrics but mechanically mid range

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I've been seeing this thing for months and there's been no updates. Is there any word on release date/price, I really how this isn't vaporware.

[–] The_Grinch@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

#Your printer includes tracking codes on every page you print

Including the serial number and where the printer was sold. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Ah you beat me to it!

Yep.

This is the real reason that an open source printer would get a ton of pushback... it would make it so that law enforcement agencies can't use the detailed, near invisible, functional serial numbers that snitch on all their users.

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

HP Inkjet cartridges though cringe

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Printhead compatibility: HP 63 (US), HP 302 (Europe)

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago

Sounds like it comes with a refillable cartridge, but you can also use off the shelf HP cartridges.

And since there's no DRM, 3rd party cartridges will work too.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why oh why did they place the power barrel connector on the side like that?

[–] crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looking at one of the images, probably so you can wall-mount the printer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Bring back the Scrolls!

load more comments
view more: next ›