this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
457 points (98.3% liked)
Open Source
44467 readers
265 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not open printer. Not open source. You will only be able to get replacements from them, worse than some other printer companies...
Creative Commons NonCommercial license (Wikipedia)
Not sure why you're spouting complete bullshit and where your basing those statements on.
It pretty clearly states you'll be able to 3D print parts yourself. It's also using a Raspberry Pi inside, which I'm fairly sure you can buy wherever you want, so saying you can only get parts from them is complete bullshit.
Are you a shill for printer companies or something?
NC - non commercial. Nobody is alowed to sell you the printer nor replacements. Yea you can print it yourself, for that 1% that has a printer.
Maybe actually learn to read what this applies too, the website is very clear on this.
Their own parts are open source, the rest are readily available components.
The BY-NC-SA 4.0 is not an open source license. This printer is not open source. Stop calling it. Even if they themselves call it that way, or "open".
I've met face to face with the person pushing this in Google Summer Of Code mentors meetup Munich. It's not open source.