61

On Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that its experts had found no mines or explosives on the rooftops of two reactor units and turbine halls at the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said in a statement that "following repeated requests," the agency's expert team was given "unimpeded access" on Thursday afternoon to the rooftops of Unit 3 and Unit 4 reactor buildings at the Zaporizhia plant and "could also clearly view the rooftops of the turbine halls."

Grossi said the expert team would continue its requests to visit the roofs of the other four reactor units at the facility.

On July 23, the IAEA experts stationed at the Zaporizhia plant spotted "directional anti-personnel mines on the periphery of the site."

On Friday, the IAEA chief said that experts confirmed "the mines first observed on July 23 were still in place" during an inspection on Aug. 1, but "no new mines or explosives were observed during any walkdowns over the past week."

Grossi stressed the importance of the IAEA experts being granted timely access to all areas of the Zaporizhia plant, saying that "timely, independent and objective reporting of facts on the ground is crucial to continue the IAEA's efforts to support nuclear safety and security."

"Previously, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky accused Russia of planning a terrorist attack against the core of the nuclear plant.. but provided no evidence to support his accusation," TASS recalled.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nabs@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I feel like the headline is super misleading: On Friday, the IAEA chief said that experts confirmed “the mines first observed on July 23 were still in place” during an inspection on Aug. 1, but “no new mines or explosives were observed during any walkdowns over the past week.”

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah there's a huge difference between, "No new explosives," and, "No explosives."

The headline is so misleading it's straight up misinformation IMO

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Mines around the periphery of the site. That’s different than in the plant itself.

Why would they be on a 5 meter thick, Reinforced Concrete Roof and not inside?

Its already enough to even have military near a nuclear power plant in general.

[-] Pogogunner@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The theory I heard was to make the impression of artillery strikes, so that Russia could claim that Ukraine is doing military strikes on the power plant

I think even the most ignorant Russian Commander got the memo that regardless who shells the fucking nuclear power plant, it will lead to a nato intervention to prevent Chernobyl 2

Also they could just artillery the thing themselves...

[-] Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Datlyof: You didnt see bombs on the roof.... YOU DIDNT!

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
61 points (82.1% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2678 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS