this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
87 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28174 readers
2528 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Congressional Democratic leaders are asking ICE to agree to reforms, promising to vote for $11 billion in funding for the agency if it does so. ICE has every reason to concede to the demands — then ignore them once the funding bill passes.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Dem leaders yet again drop the ball that was handed to them on a silver platter.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago

If not controlled opposition, why controlled opposition shaped?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

If there was an award for understatement, you’d deserve one.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 49 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats are fucking worthless

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Your entire fucking government is worthless; burn it all down and re-build.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Many of us are trying but so many are comfortable with the privileges they have by keeping the status quo. They'll talk one thing and support the opposite. The types that will support the oppressed in a movie then vote for the oppressor in real life.

[–] Auk@lemmy.world 26 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Perhaps NY’s 8th will vote this spineless, compromised shill out of office in November.

[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

Hakeem Jeffries is up for reelection this November. Currently, he has only one June 23 primary challenger, Vance Bostic. This honestly looks like Jeffries will win in a landslide.

Schumer will continue to mutter his goddam inanities for years, as he isn’t up for reelection until November 2028.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Here's what I want Republicans and Democrats to explain - make it make sense how ICE needs all this funding. How did they possibly get by before?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

They need funding to build more genocide sites

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 hours ago

Please primary these 2 clowns

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 5 hours ago

"Why is it always these 2?"

Yes, I know they are the party leadershit.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Neoliberals only have a problem with authoritarianism when they're not in control.

They don't want to destroy the ring like Gandalf, they want to hide in a hole like Smeagol until they learn to use it.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

These useless morons

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Honestly I’m on the fence about yanking the DHS funding. Trump is just going to fund ICE through other piles of money that he got in the BBB and that he’ll just start cutting other more critical services. Like FEMA, which is under the DHS.

If the Dems can effectively communicate that Trump is using FEMA, TSA, and coastguard money for ICE, then they should cut funding. But I’m not particularly confident about the Dems ability to communicate this. Hell, a lot of people don’t even realize that Trump can still fund ICE if Dems holdback DHS funding. They have not effectively communicated this.