theres at least 48 weeds species that are resistance to glyphosphate, only matter of time that becomes more species, grasses, horseweed, russian thistle are notable ones.
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
177 points (98.4% liked)
World News
53706 readers
1917 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The supposed HFF website does not state their exact findings, nor have a scientific paper regarding their findings, nor have any sort of transparency like who's even operating and funding the website.
There is a link to a form supposedly allowing anyone to report about "bad" food, but that's suspicious.
Domain name is about 34 days old. https://whois.domaintools.com/exposingfoodtoxins.com
Very sketchy.
As far as I am aware, this is a new initiative from Florida's government, see:
Governor Ron DeSantis, First Lady Casey DeSantis, and Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced new food safety findings under the Healthy Florida First initiative, with the release of bread product testing results conducted by the Florida Department of Health (DOH) to increase transparency for Florida families and reinforce accountability for everyday food products.
They spend lots of time and money on worrying about ingredients; they could as well sell bags of chia seeds or space protein goo in jars.
Unless they provide more information, it feels like there's a profit motive in what appears to be meaningful activism against supposedly "harmful" food. Knowing DeSantis being a clone copy of Mussolini, I'd consider following the money.
So this is based on numbers from the same site that was putting out the arsenic levels in candy that was like 100x higher than the WHO numbers? The ones that said you could only have like 240 tiny Nerds per year?
At this point I’m more skeptical of what agenda is trying to be pushed from these tbh, because I’m not seeing any methodology to support any of these findings.
because I’m not seeing any methodology to support any of these findings.
I agree, as another commenter mentioned, the information could have been better presented by the government of Florida, and more details provided to those that might want to dig in on the results from Florida Department of Health
It’s in literally all processed foods.
It's in the flour, its on the veggies too
Ya, it’s in basically everything. Anything with wheat, oats, beans, soy etc etc etc. If you don’t eat organic items, you are eating glyphosate.
Organic foods can still have synthetic pesticide used.
most of them are grown right beside non organic fields and winds blow.
And organics have residues of the "natural" pesticides they use, which are often just as bad if not worse.
What’s an example of worse?
Rotenone, nicotine, copper sulfate, and pyrethrin/pyrethrum (broad spectrum insecticide that harms beneficial insects) come immediately to mind. Copper sulfate's big issue is it breaks down quickly and needs to be frequently reapplied, leading to copper accumulation in the soil.
Presumably copper
Yes, plus, organic farms near non-organics can have the chemicals, too.
To be clear, different organic certification standards exist, and some, like oregon tilth, test soil for drift from the neighbouring fields. Part of why organic food is more expensive, it’s an externality from conventional agriculture.
The linked Healthy Florida First page gives measurements found but nowhere suggests what a reasonable limit is. The dose is the poison, people.
Imagine if they just published arsenic levels found in various fish but gave no context.
I wrote the above, and then I checked their site. They only have 3 categories, and arsenic is in the candy one. They give the safe consumption limit there. I guess they're implying no level of glyphosate is safe?
Prioritize Nutrition as the Root Cause of Chronic Diseases
That's a weird goal. Do you think they just didn't proof read it?
There are genuine research bodies, and then there are "research" bodies -- covertly funded by corporations -- that borderline scaring people into buying a specific product because it's "safer" or "recommended" by an equally sketchy group of supposed "professionals".
Arsenic occurs naturally in many plants. Glyphosate does not.
So no, no amount of it is safe to consume.
How does that follow?
It doesn't.
"Thing found" is very different from "dangerous levels of thing found".
Yeah - I know you think that "there is no safe level" but that's not true.
Also - "probably carcinogenic" is a pretty low bar for the WHO. See also "cooked meat" for things that are "probably carcinogenic".
What's the safe level?
We can't find any effects in farm animals.
The rest of this research is mostly lab-based garbage where they inject or feed ridiculous levels to rodents. This is a fucking industry of junk science.
I'll answer your question with a question as I suspect you're not being serious.
What's the "safe level" of exposure to radiation from the Sun? A well known carcinogen.
Can you avoid the sun the same as you can avoid glyphosate?
Ask your local goth community.
I'm dead serious, since you state that it's not true that there's no safe level, what is it?
My answer to your question is I don't know, but it's irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
First you need to define "safe". Nothing, and I mean nothing, is safe at any level. Water is a poison at high enough doses.
So the FDA generally looks to studies to find a "no observed adverse affect level" of exposure. Often from animal studies since you can't ethically do since research on humans.
They then set targets at 1/100th that amount to account for uncertainty.
This isn't a static assessment either, it's updated as new evidence arises.
I don't have to define anything, since you made the claim, unless you meant that it's important to first define what safe means. In that case please, again, provide some details for your claim that it's untrue that there is no safe level of Glyphosate consumption. What is safe?
Comparing Glyphosate to water is being disingenuous, would you agree?
This is a big contributor to why cancer rates are elevated in Iowa. Lots of farm land means lots of chemicals sprayed. Fortunately our fearless governor, Kim Reynolds, and her band of merry assholes are trying to protect Monsanto from legal liability by making it illegal to sue them. It passed in the Senate but failed to get back through the house... So far. Not for lack of trying from Beyer and the aformentioned conservative ill running the state.
This is a big contributor to why cancer rates are elevated in Iowa.
Map of US cancer rates: Iowa about average.
Map of US obesity rates:
Florida Man for the win?
I doubt it’s just Florida buddy
Oh for sure. I was just pleasantly surprised that the news was from there. Thanks Florida Man!
EU joins the chat. I wonder how spread it is over here.
Glyphosate has been assessed 3 times in the EU. The first assessment resulted in initial approval of glyphosate in the EU in July 2002. The second assessment, which was carried out between 2012 and 2017 , led to the first renewal of approval.
The most recent assessment was carried out between 2019 and 2023 by Member State Competent Authorities, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), and showed that there is currently no scientific or legal justification for a ban. This led to the renewal of approval of glyphosate in 2023.
Under the conditions of approval and by following good agricultural practices, glyphosate is considered not to pose any harmful effects on human health or unacceptable effects on the environment.
Yeah, I know lobbiest did good, I meant how spread in food it is