this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
455 points (99.1% liked)

politics

28716 readers
2322 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 116 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"This is significant because Kash Patel testified to Congress that FBI had no evidence of other sex traffickers," Massie added. "This is FBI’s own 2019 document listing [Les] Wexner as coconspirator in child sex trafficking. It wasn’t unredacted until tonight."

Wait . . . So he was lying when he said that???

Well don’t that beat all.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 39 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

While we all knew he was lying. Now there's documented evidence proving that he did, and that's much more actionable.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump was a trafficker. Trump Model Management was started years before Epstein's MC2 modeling.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump probably taught Jeff everything he needed to know.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They both learned from John Casablancas.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

At age 42, Casablancas began dating 14 year old Stephanie Seymour while he was married to model Jeanette Christiansen. In 1993, the 50-year-old Casablancas married his third wife, 17-year-old Aline Mendonça de Carvalho Wermelinger, winner of Elite Model Look 1992 in Brazil, who he had met as a schoolgirl. He would also be friends with Donald Trump, Elite Model Management represented his daughter Ivankawhen she became a fashion model at age 15.

Jesus.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

This explains why his face looks like that all the time.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 83 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The Republican is Thomas Massie, as expected. It seems that he is one of a few Republicans who will act ethically as long as the topic is Epstein.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 51 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He also defended Alex Pretti carrying a gun, saying it’s not a death sentence but a right.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would he have said that if Alex was a legal US Citizen carrying a gun legally but instead he was a brown man? Probably not, just because Massie argues against his own team he's still a leopard with the same spots. GOP, always assume ulterior motives.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There used to be some Republicans that I respected to some degree, even if I disagreed with their policies. John McCain, Ron Paul, and Mitt Romney are examples.

Now the only hope I have for current Republican politicians is that some of them are secretly opposing Trump because of their own ambitions. I don't think a good person could have kept quiet about Trump.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The ones you respected have done some terrible shit in the name of status quo. Some of it has flown under the radar.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

The politicians I mentioned stood out because they didn't always toe the party line. They actually represented their constituents, and that's the bare minimum I think you need to be an elected representative. Whatever else they've done, the fact that they actually served as representatives makes them stand head and shoulders above the usual throngs of spineless losers who serve as our congresspersons.

When you give the party as much power as our politicians do, it violates the most basic principles that this country was founded upon.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The ones you mentioned are all despicable people, maybe do some research. They literally just acted somewhat reserved and dignified in public while performing their atrocities. I'd argue that's actually worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

Only because he's gone after November. After that, we won't have his help. There are a lot of other outgoing MAGAs that aren't speaking up, hoping to slip out of this with nobody remembering that they were part of it. That's why carving a Swastika into their foreheads is so important.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 63 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Make no mistake, these republicans seemingly coming forward having a conscience is not a come to Jesus moment. They're posturing because they are fucking scared of impending doom.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And they may have been 'given permission' because of the strategy regarding the upcoming election.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Please elaborate

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If that's what it takes for them to do their jobs, I'm fine with it.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Smoke and mirrors my friend. This will not lead to them doing a job, just them attempting to keep their job and their freedom.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fox news: "Who is this Patel anyway? He's just a low level coffee boy FBI Director. As usual the Democrats (shut up I know its a Republican) lie about who has what information! Coffee boy FBI Directors wouldn't have access to unredacted information! It was Joseph Stalin Hussien Biden who did it!"

[–] notabot@piefed.social 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The plausibility of your comment saddens me.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I had to look up to make sure this was indeed made up... thats how much stupid shit Faux news Infotainment says

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder if they would have instead called him a chaiwala just to add some racial undertones.

[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 52 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Here's a sobering thought: You think all these predators suddenly stopped trafficking and raping girls once Epstein was dead? This shit is still happening in other dark places more likely than not.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 7 points 2 weeks ago

The Franklin incident happened in the 80s and may be the precursor to Epstein. It's very similar, never resolved and the cover up ended with a dosen "suicides" and "found shot in the head"s, a plane crash that killed the lead investigator and his son, and victim Alisha Owens in prison for 15 years for perjury because she refused to recant.

Also Epstein's xbox account has been active since he died but before it leaked. Kids play xbox. I haven't seen login locations just times but certainly an interesting lead for someone

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some of the victims say they have been to at least 3 different islands. It is much bigger than Epstein.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago

And it wasn't just islands. He had the girls on palm beach in Florida, there's tons of evidence of that. Seems he used his NY home the same way. Probably why both were wired with cameras like the little saint james island.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

I've thought of this. Trump is in a perfect position to steal young girls from one of his Concentration Camps, and nobody knows more about Epstein's operation than him.

We can't count on him being too moral to operate such a business, and he finds any avarice too tempting to resist, and he doesn't have the impulse control to resist anyway.

And on top of it, he thinks he's immune from prosecution for it. He could literally run TV ads to fuck 12 year olds, and nothing would happen to him, or at least he thinks so.

I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is working on exploiting that business opportunity right now.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And surely they've learned to use more secure communication methods, so the likelihood of there ever being more files like this are slim.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That may be true, but governments' and agencies spying apparatus have become infinitely more advanced.

If we could elect people who actually care for the law, justice and children we could clean up the FBI / CIA and cripple the pedophile network.

But step one is literarily NOT electing fucking child rapists.... But apparently that's too hard for Americans

Fuck Trump, this entire pedophile administration and any piece of shit that voted for this pile of human garbage

[–] stressballs@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

All of our current forms of consumer encryption will be broken within 30 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Novis 23 points 3 weeks ago

Until something actually happens, this is nothing. We're very long past the point of words and outrage being effective. Until people GO TO JAIL, all of this is roleplay.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

But will it have consequences? The whole structure of the current US government is built on and around the notion that laws and consequences are not applicable to the "in-people".

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bro lookin like he took a fat dookie again

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is “fat dookie” what we’re calling an eight ball these days?

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sometimes gotta work hard at that dookie.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

Also famously cut with baby laxative.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it abnormal for Thomas Massie to speak up? If so that's significant. If he's retiring, not so much. They always attempt to grow a spine when they know they will be away from danger.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Massie teamed up with Dem Khanna(sp?) to get the Epstein file bill snuck into a House vote. Whatever else he's done wrong, he's been solidly focused on getting this shit public for a while.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

While it is absolutely true what you're saying about the miraculous post-retirement regenerative power of vestigial Republican spines, strangely enough Massie's on the right side of Epstein and has been all along.

Is it abnormal for Thomas Massie to speak up?

Not on Epstein. I don't know anything about Massie's other voting history, but on Epstein the orange chancre has threatened him directly more than once, and he has never backed down. Without Massie and the other Rs who crossed the aisle, EFTA would not have passed.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Torture porn? Fuuuuck. This keeps getting worse and worse. All of these sick fucks need to hang in the streets. Both, the ones that committed the crimes and the ones that helped cover them up.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

If it’s significant, do something about it.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 weeks ago

bug eyed fascist geek

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I was this Patel guy I'd be looking out for bus wheels...

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

He's got his eyes wide open watching for those wheels.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Bet on it: for the FBI under Trump it is more important to protect the guilty wealthy and influential criminals than protecting and providing justice to the victims.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

What would really be significant is some consequences.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But he seems so trustworthy and doesn't look at all like he needs to end a press conference immediately to scuttle off with the boss's diaper bag (a.k.a. "Football #2").

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

When the Dems take back the House in November, they should bring up Kameleon Kash on perjury charges.

load more comments
view more: next ›