Who is "we"? I certainly won't regret the release.
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
783 readers
514 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
WHO'S "WE," MOTHERFUCKER? 
That very school of Criticism has proclaimed itself the pure, resolute, absolute Criticism which has achieved self-clarity, and in its spiritual pride has reduced the whole process of history to the relation between, on the one hand, the rest of the world, which comes into the category of the “masses,” and itself. It has assimilated all dogmatic antitheses into one dogmatic antithesis between its own sagacity and the stupidity of the world .It has daily and hourly demonstrated its own excellence against the mindlessness of the masses . The school of Criticism has made known in print its superiority to human feelings and to the world, above which it sits enthroned in sublime solitude, with nothing but an occasional roar of sarcastic laughter from its Olympian lips.
I regret the amount of reactions in them. Of course that's not at all what they're saying
Me? No. The kind of person who would write an article like this? Probably.
Ctrl + "F"
"Robby Soave"
We'll regret that releasing them didn't accomplish much because there will be minimal consequences at best
This. Just like the release of the Panama Papers didn't really lead to much. The rich hold power and they wont be using that power to hold themselves accountable.
Yep, it’s just another pile of evidence that will be ignored. New evidence of new crimes. Old evidence of old crimes. New evidence of old crimes. It won’t matter until we address the system that empowered them in the first place and empowers them still.
That said, from a purely emotional standpoint, it is psychologically soothing to find out that they are all a bunch of loser dorks with delusions of grandeur. The well festooned foppish buffoons of the modern Versaillles
What about old evidence of new crimes?
John Titor has entered the chat
The West in absolute shambles.
apparently the bad redaction job doxxed some victims and that's shitty. i can't think of other downsides that aren't contrived bullshit.
Betteridge's Law strikes again
I guess I can see an argument that this will be the thing that convinces them just how completely above the law/accountability they are and they just start openly hunting people for sport from their helicopters or somesuch.
But otherwise, no. No I will not.